The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Placebo studies and ritual theory: a comparative analysis of Navajo, acupuncture and biomedical healing
Open accessAbstract
Using a comparative analysis of Navajo healing ceremonials, acupuncture and biomedical treatment, this essay examines placebo studies and ritual theory as mutually interpenetrating disciplines. Healing rituals create a receptive person susceptible to the influences of authoritative culturally sanctioned ‘powers’. The healer provides the sufferer with imaginative, emotional, sensory, moral and aesthetic input derived from the palpable symbols and procedures of the ritual process—in the process fusing the sufferer's idiosyncratic narrative unto a universal cultural mythos. Healing rituals involve a drama of evocation, enactment, embodiment and evaluation in a charged atmosphere of hope and uncertainty. Experimental research into placebo effects demonstrates that routine biomedical pharmacological and procedural interventions contain significant ritual dimensions. This research also suggests that ritual healing not only represents changes in affect, self-awareness and self-appraisal of behavioural capacities, but involves modulations of symptoms through neurobiological mechanisms. Recent scientific investigations into placebo acupuncture suggest several ways that observations from ritual studies can be verified experimentally. Placebo effects are often described as ‘non-specific’; the analysis presented here suggests that placebo effects are the ‘specific’ effects of healing rituals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity
Rappaport, R. A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814686 · Cited by 2,295
Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions
Bell, C. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195110517.001.0001 · Cited by 1,247
Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Kaptchuk, T. J., Kelley, J. M., Conboy, L. A., Davis, R. B., Kerr, C. E., Jacobson, E. E., Kirsch, I., Schyner, R. N., Nam, B. H., Nguyen, L. T., et al. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39524.439618.25 · Cited by 1,196
Self-citationThe double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Kaptchuk, T. J. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00347-4 · Cited by 595
Self-citationBeyond attentional strategies: a cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation
Cioffi, D. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.1.25 · Cited by 426
Meaning Medicine and the “Placebo Effect”
Moerman, D. E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810855 · Cited by 401
Kong, J., Gollub, R. L., Rosman, I. S., Webb, J. M., Vangel, M. G., Kirsch, I., & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3556-05.2006 · Cited by 395
Self-citation‘Powerful Placebo: The Dark Side of the Randomised Controlled Trial’
Kaptchuk, T. J. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10111-8 · Cited by 339
Self-citationTAYLOR, C. (2007) · doi:10.4159/9780674044289 · Cited by 302
Harris, R. E., Zubieta, J.-K., Scott, D. J., Napadow, V., Gracely, R. H., & Clauw, D. J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.083 · Cited by 296
Cited by
Altered Placebo and Drug Labeling Changes the Outcome of Episodic Migraine Attacks
Kam-Hansen, S., Jakubowski, M., Kelley, J. M., Kirsch, I., Hoaglin, D. C., Kaptchuk, T. J., & Burstein, R. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006175 · Cited by 399
Self-citationSchedlowski, M., Enck, P., Rief, W., & Bingel, U. (2015) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.114.009423 · Cited by 323
Nonconscious activation of placebo and nocebo pain responses
Jensen, K. B., Kaptchuk, T. J., Kirsch, I., Raicek, J., Lindstrom, K. M., Berna, C., Gollub, R. L., Ingvar, M., & Kong, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1202056109 · Cited by 305
Self-citationConsiderations and methods for placebo controls in surgical trials (ASPIRE guidelines)
Beard, D. J., Campbell, M. K., Blazeby, J. M., Carr, A. J., Weijer, C., Cuthbertson, B. H., Buchbinder, R., Pinkney, T., Bishop, F. L., Pugh, J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)33137-x · Cited by 96
Darragh, M., Yow, B., Kieser, A., Booth, R. J., Kydd, R. R., & Consedine, N. S. (2016) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415621390 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaptchuk, T. J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2011-06-27
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 1572
- Pages
- 1849-1858
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2108002918
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placebo studies and ritual theory: a comparative analysis of Navajo, acupuncture and biomedical healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2010.0385
- The paper
- Kaptchuk, T. J. (2011). Placebo studies and ritual theory: a comparative analysis of Navajo, acupuncture and biomedical healing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
