The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Associative learning and animal cognition
Open accessAbstract
Associative learning plays a variety of roles in the study of animal cognition from a core theoretical component to a null hypothesis against which the contribution of cognitive processes is assessed. Two developments in contemporary associative learning have enhanced its relevance to animal cognition. The first concerns the role of associatively activated representations, whereas the second is the development of hybrid theories in which learning is determined by prediction errors, both directly and indirectly through associability processes. However, it remains unclear whether these developments allow associative theory to capture the psychological rationality of cognition. I argue that embodying associative processes within specific processing architectures provides mechanisms that can mediate psychological rationality and illustrate such embodiment by discussing the relationship between practical reasoning and the associative-cybernetic model of goal-directed action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It should be noted that the dual-process or “associative-cybernetic” approaches of Dickinson and Balleine and colleagues (e.g., Balleine & Ostlund, 2007; de Wit & Dickinson, 2009; Dickinson, 2012) do posit separate and co-existing action and habit memories.”
From Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Dickinson, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind
Searle, J. R. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173452 · Cited by 4,575
Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
Black, A. H., & Prokasy, W. F. (1972) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · Cited by 4,449
An Integrated Theory of the Mind.
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. J., & Qin, Y. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1036 · Cited by 3,153
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076778 · Cited by 2,733
Searle, J. R. (1983) · Cited by 2,418
Searle, J. R. (1983) · Cited by 2,418
Anderson, J. R., Bower, G. H., & Bower, G. H. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203780831 · Cited by 2,031
Cognition, evolution, and behavior
Shettleworth, S. J. (2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5652 · Cited by 1,455
Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior
Shettleworth, S. J. (2009) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195319842.001.0001 · Cited by 1,453
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pearce J. M., 2010, Attention and associative learning, 11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Friston, K. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.001 · Cited by 650
“This is the main focus of associative learning theories in psychology and biology.”
Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Progress and challenges
Sulzer, J., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Weiskopf, N., Birbaumer, N., Blefari, M. L., Bruehl, A. B., Cohen, L. G., deCharms, R. C., Gassert, R., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.033 · Cited by 453
“In recent review papers on learning and memory (Dickinson, 2012; Gallistel and Matzel, 2013), prominent neuroscientists in the field discussed two major extant theoretical frameworks, namely, associative learning and information representation.”
BackgroundLeDoux, J. E., & Daw, N. D. (2018) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.22 · Cited by 405
Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives
Thornton, A., & Lukas, D. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0214 · Cited by 387
Model-based and model-free Pavlovian reward learning: Revaluation, revision, and revelation
Dayan, P., & Berridge, K. C. (2014) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0277-8 · Cited by 357
“Stimulus substitution might be seen as one of the simplest steps away from a pure valence expectation, involving a very simple associative (or mediating; Dwyer, Mackintosh, & Boakes, 1998) prediction (Dickinson, 2012).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickinson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dickinson, Anthony
- ORCID
- Dickinson, Anthony
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2012-10-05
- Volume
- 367
- Issue
- 1603
- Pages
- 2733-2742
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC3427555
- OpenAlex
- W2096798307
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- associative learning, animal cognition, associative representations, prediction error, embodiment, practical reasoning, goal-directed action, cybernetic model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Association Learning, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Conditioning, Psychological, Cybernetics, Habits, Memory, Rationalization, Reinforcement, Psychology, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
