Cited by 453EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Progress and challenges

Open access
Sulzer, J., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Weiskopf, N., Birbaumer, N., Blefari, M.L., Bruehl, A.B., Cohen, L.G. +9 more·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

In February of 2012, the first international conference on real time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI) neurofeedback was held at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), Switzerland. This review summarizes progress in the field, introduces current debates, elucidates open questions, and offers viewpoints derived from the conference. The review offers perspectives on study design, scientific and clinical applications, rtfMRI learning mechanisms and future outlook.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.033

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No explicit strategies or instructions were given because implicit strategies have been shown to produce better outcomes.

    “Notably, no explicit strategies or instructions were given as, with few exceptions [204], implicit strategies have been shown to produce better outcomes [205–210].”

    From Infraslow closed-loop brain training for anxiety and depression (ISAD): a protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial in adult females with internalizing disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [210]

    In “Neurofeedback of physiological target response” (page unavailable), the paper calls the implicit-versus-explicit comparison an unresolved debate, not an established advantage for implicit strategies. It reports that one direct comparison found no learning with implicit strategies, while participants learned after receiving explicit strategies; other studies showed that implicit learning was possible, not that it produced better outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kasper L Marti S Vannesjö SJ Hutton C Dolan R Weiskopf N Stephan KE Prüssmann KP 2009 Cardiac Artefact Correction for Human Brainstem fMRI at 7 Tesla Proc. Organization of Human Brain Mapping San Francisco, CA
  2. Schenck JF 2000 Safety of strong, staticmagnetic fields J Magn Reson Imaging 12 1 2 19 10931560

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sulzer, J., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Weiskopf, N., Birbaumer, N., Blefari, M. L., Bruehl, A. B., Cohen, L. G., deCharms, R. C., Gassert, R., Goebel, R., Herwig, U., LaConte, S., Linden, D., Luft, A., Seifritz, E., & Sitaram, R.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Omneuron (United States) (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Sulzer, J.
  • Haller, S.
  • Scharnowski, F.
  • Weiskopf, N.
  • Sitaram, R.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
76
Pages
386-399
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990400194
Cited by
453
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 13
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31CO30_139955)
  • European Commission
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • European Research Council
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • Universität Zürich
  • Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
real-time fMRI, neurofeedback, functional MRI, research design, clinical application, scientific applications
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurofeedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review