The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes
Open accessAbstract
Land plants underpin a multitude of ecosystem functions, support human livelihoods and represent a critically important component of terrestrial biodiversity—yet many tens of thousands of species await discovery, and plant identification remains a substantial challenge, especially where material is juvenile, fragmented or processed. In this opinion article, we tackle two main topics. Firstly, we provide a short summary of the strengths and limitations of plant DNA barcoding for addressing these issues. Secondly, we discuss options for enhancing current plant barcodes, focusing on increasing discriminatory power via either gene capture of nuclear markers or genome skimming. The former has the advantage of establishing a defined set of target loci maximizing efficiency of sequencing effort, data storage and analysis. The challenge is developing a probe set for large numbers of nuclear markers that works over sufficient phylogenetic breadth. Genome skimming has the advantage of using existing protocols and being backward compatible with existing barcodes; and the depth of sequence coverage can be increased as sequencing costs fall. Its non-targeted nature does, however, present a major informatics challenge for upscaling to large sample sets. This article is part of the themed issue ‘From DNA barcodes to biomes’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A DNA-Based Registry for All Animal Species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) System
Ratnasingham, S., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066213 · Cited by 2,301
The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome
Li, R., Fan, W., Tian, G., Zhu, H., He, L., Cai, J., Huang, Q., Cai, Q., Li, B., Bai, Y., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08696 · Cited by 1,180
Self-citation
Cited by
A DNA barcoding framework for taxonomic verification in the Darwin Tree of Life Project
Twyford, A. D., Beasley, J., Barnes, I., Allen, H., Azzopardi, F., Bell, D., Blaxter, M. L., Broad, G., Campos-Dominguez, L., Choonea, D., et al. (2024) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21143.1 · Cited by 801
Self-citationJohnson, M. G., Pokorny, L., Dodsworth, S., Botigué, L. R., Cowan, R. S., Devault, A., Eiserhardt, W. L., Epitawalage, N., Forest, F., Kim, J. T., et al. (2019) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy086 · Cited by 593
A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation
Hinsley, A., de Boer, H. J., Fay, M. F., Gale, S. W., Gardiner, L. M., Gunasekara, R. S., Kumar, P., Masters, S., Metusala, D., Roberts, D. L., et al. (2018) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/botlinnean/box083 · Cited by 355
Scaling up: A guide to high‐throughput genomic approaches for biodiversity analysis
Porter, T. M., & Hajibabaei, M. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14478 · Cited by 305
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollingsworth, P. M., Li, D.-Z., van der Bank, M., & Twyford, A. D.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2016-09-05
- Volume
- 371
- Issue
- 1702
- Pages
- 20150338
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2499213204
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2015.0338
- The paper
- Hollingsworth, P. M., Li, D.-Z., van der Bank, M., & Twyford, A. D. (2016). Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.