Cited by 64Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Conscious access in the near absence of attention: critical extensions on the dual-task paradigm

Open access
Matthews, Julian, Schröder, Pia, Kaunitz, Lisandro, van Boxtel, Jeroen J. A., Tsuchiya, Naotsugu·2018·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Whether conscious perception requires attention remains a topic of intense debate. While certain complex stimuli such as faces and animals can be discriminated outside the focus of spatial attention, many simpler stimuli cannot. Because such evidence was obtained in dual-task paradigms involving no measure of subjective insight, it remains unclear whether accurate discrimination of unattended complex stimuli is the product of automatic, unconscious processing, as in blindsight, or is accessible to consciousness. Furthermore, these paradigms typically require extensive training over many hours, bringing into question whether this phenomenon can be achieved in naive subjects. We developed a novel dual-task paradigm incorporating confidence ratings to calculate metacognition and adaptive staircase procedures to reduce training. With minimal training, subjects were able to discriminate face-gender in the near absence of top–down attentional amplification, while also displaying above-chance metacognitive accuracy. By contrast, the discrimination of simple coloured discs was significantly impaired and metacognitive accuracy dropped to chance-level, even in a partial-report condition. In a final experiment, we used blended face/disc stimuli and confirmed that face-gender but not colour orientation can be discriminated in the dual task. Our results show direct evidence for metacognitive conscious access in the near absence of attention for complex, but not simple, stimuli. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2017.0352

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information is encoded automatically whether or not the details are attended to.

    “and thus information is encoded automatically whether or not the details are attended to [154].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [154]

  • Recent evidence demonstrates that humans have conscious access to incidentally encoded information within memories and can target this information in order to solve memory tasks.

    “recent evidence demonstrates that humans have conscious access to incidentally encoded information within memories and can target this information in order to solve memory tasks [154,177–179].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [154]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthews, J., Schröder, P., Kaunitz, L., van Boxtel, J. J. A., & Tsuchiya, N.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Corresponding author
  • Matthews, Julian
  • Tsuchiya, Naotsugu
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2018-07-30
Volume
373
Issue
1755
Pages
20170352
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2750169413
Cited by
64
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (3630)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (P15048)
  • Australian Research Council (DP130100194, FT120100619)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
conscious perception, attention, dual-task paradigm, metacognition, metacognitive accuracy, top-down attention, blindsight, unconscious processes, confidence ratings, perceptual consciousness
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Attention, Consciousness, Female, Humans, Male, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review