Cited by 117Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionGut microbiota and health

Distribution of anaerobic fungi in the digestive tract of cattle and their survival in faeces

Davies, D. R., Theodorou, M. K., Lawrence, M. I. G., Trinci, A. P. J.·1993·Journal of General Microbiology

Abstract

A most probable numbers procedure was used to enumerate populations of anaerobic fungi in the digesta and faeces of cattle. Anaerobic fungi were isolated from the rumen, omasum, abomasum, small intestine, caecum, large intestine and faeces. By determining the amount of digesta in each organ of the digestive tract, it was possible to estimate the total population of anaerobic fungi in cattle and make comparisons between populations in different organs. In addition to enumerating anaerobic fungi in freshly collected samples, they were quantified in digesta and faeces which had been dried at ambient temperature and stored in air for up to 9 months. These experiments showed that a higher proportion of the anaerobic fungi present in the hindgut and faeces were able to withstand desiccation than those present within the gastric and pre-gastric organs. Our results support the hypothesis that the life cycle of anaerobic fungi consists of three stages; the motile zoospore, the vegetative thallus and an aero-tolerant survival stage (cyst or resistant zoosporangium).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00221287-139-6-1395

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The post-ruminal microbial community is composed predominantly of bacteria, but methanogenic archaea and anaerobic fungi have been described.

    “The post-ruminal microbial community is composed predominantly of bacteria, but methanogenic archaea and anaerobic fungi have been described (Davies et al., 1993), although the later phylogentic group has not been targeted intensively with high-throughput sequencing techniques.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, D. R., Theodorou, M. K., Lawrence, M. I. G., & Trinci, A. P. J.
Affiliations
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Journal of General Microbiology
Published
1993-06-01
Volume
139
Issue
6
Pages
1395-1400
ISSN
0022-1287 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976943954
Cited by
117
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of General Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
anaerobic fungi, rumen, feces, fungal survival, desiccation tolerance, fungal life cycle, zoospores, cysts, fungal enumeration, hindgut
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Animals, Cattle, Digestive System, Feces, Female, Fungi, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Organ Specificity, Colony Count, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review