Cited by 82Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyInfectious Diseases and MycologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Distribution and estimation of anaerobic zoosporic fungi along the digestive tracts of sheep

Open access
Rezaeian, Mohammad, Beakes, Gordon W., Parker, David S.·2004·Mycological Research

Abstract

The status of anaerobic zoosporic (Chytridiomycota) fungi along the entire digestive tract of sheep was assessed both analytically and microscopically. Digest samples were taken from different segments of the digestive tracts of three newly killed sheep that previously had been used in experimental dietary studies. These digest samples were tested for the presence of rumen fungi by assessing the recovery of live fungi from the samples, direct observation of digested plant remains under the scanning electron microscope (SEM), and using a chitin assay as an estimation of fungal biomass. Live anaerobic fungi were recovered from the abomasum, small and large intestine, caecum and faeces of sheep, but not from the digest samples of rumen and omasum. However, SEM examination of the samples confirmed the presence of fungal structures from all of these organs. In the large intestine and caecum samples the observed sporangial structures were rounded and showed conspicuous surface pitting. Results of the chitin assay indicated that the anaerobic fungi might account for up to 20% of the total microbial biomass in the rumen of sheep. The results of this study support the view that anaerobic fungi may be present as a resistant stage in the lower reaches of the digestive tract.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0953756204000929

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rezaeian, M., Beakes, G. W., & Parker, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Rezaeian, Mohammad
Venue
Mycological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
108
Issue
10
Pages
1227-1233
ISSN
0953-7562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046551603
Cited by
82
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mycological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Infectious Diseases and Mycology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
Chytridiomycota, rumen fungi, fungal distribution, fungal biomass estimation, sporangia, cecum, abomasum, intestinal fungi, ruminant gut microbiota
MeSH terms
Animals, Chitin, Gastrointestinal Contents, Male, Chytridiomycota, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Sheep, Biomass, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review