The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Microbial Ecology of the Large Bowel of Breastfed and Formula-fed Infants During the First Year of Life
Abstract
The succession of bacterial populations in the large bowel of seven breast-fed and seven formula-fed infants was examined during the first year of life. The composition of the intestinal microflora varied according to the infant's diet. During the first week of life breast-fed and formula-fed infants were colonised by enterobacteria and enterococci followed by bifidobacteria, Bacteroides spp., clostridia and anaerobic streptococci. From week 4 until solid foods were given, breast-fed babies had a simple flora consisting of bifidobacteria and relatively few enterobacteria and enterococci. Formula-fed babies during the corresponding period were more often colonised by other anaerobes in addition to bifidobacteria and had higher counts of facultatively anaerobic bacteria. The introduction of solid food to the breast-fed infants caused a major disturbance in the microbial ecology of the large bowel as counts of enterobacteria and enterococci rose sharply and colonisation by Bacteroides spp., clostridia and anaerobic streptococci occurred. This was not observed when formula-fed infants began to take solids; instead, counts of facultative anaerobes remained high while colonisation by anaerobes other than bifidobacteria continued. At 12 months, the anaerobic bacterial populations of the large bowel of breast-fed and formula-fed infants were beginning to resemble those of adults in number and composition and there was a corresponding decrease in the number of facultative anaerobes. These changes are discussed in relation to changes in susceptibility to gastro-intestinal infection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Multiple studies have established differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiota based on whether infants are breast- or formula-fed5-7.”
From Diet and the Intestinal Microbiome: Associations, Functions, and Implications for Health and Disease (2014) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Some of the differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiota in breast-fed vs formula-fed infants are thought to be secondary to the effects of MOS on these bacteria—many studies have shown an increased proportion of Bifidobacteria in breast-fed infants 6, 7, 11 compared to formula-fed infants.”
From Diet and the Intestinal Microbiome: Associations, Functions, and Implications for Health and Disease (2014) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“aerobic organisms seem to be more prevalent in the feces of breast-fed infants, whereas anaerobic and facultatively anaerobic organisms, which preferentially use anerobic glycolysis, are more commonly found in the feces of formula-fed infants6.”
From Diet and the Intestinal Microbiome: Associations, Functions, and Implications for Health and Disease (2014) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood
Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S., & Irwin, J. O. (1938) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s002217240001158x · Cited by 3,619
Iron-binding Proteins in Milk and Resistance to Escherichia coli Infection in Infants
Bullen, J. J., Rogers, H. J., & Leigh, L. C. (1972) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5792.69 · Cited by 651
Some current concepts in intestinal bacteriology
Moore, W., Cato, E., & Holdeman, L. V. (1978) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/31.10.s33 · Cited by 256
INTESTINAL COLONIZATION OF BREAST‐FED CHILDREN IN A RURAL AREA OF LOW SOCIOECONOMIC LEVEL*
Mata, L. J., & Urrutia, J. J. (1971) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb34996.x · Cited by 251
MITSUOKA, T., & Kaneuchi, C. (1977) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/30.11.1799 · Cited by 213
Bifidobacteria in the intestinal tract of infants: an in-vivo study
Bullen, C. L., TEARLE, P. V., & Willis, A. T. (1976) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-9-3-325 · Cited by 164
The Effect of "Humanised" Milks and Supplemented Breast Feeding on The Faecal Flora of Infants
Bullen, C. L., TEARLE, P. V., & STEWART, M. G. (1977) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-10-4-403 · Cited by 155
The normal colonic bacterial flora.
Hill, M. J., & Drašar, B. S. (1975) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.16.4.318 · Cited by 139
Infant feeding and infant mortality in rural Chile.
Plank, S. J., & Ml, M. (1973) · PubMed · Cited by 134
Longitudinal study of the morbidity of diarrheal and respiratory infections in malnourished children
James, J. (1972) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/25.7.690 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K., & Knight, R. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11550 · Cited by 5,533
Development of the Human Infant Intestinal Microbiota
Palmer, C., Bik, E. M., DiGiulio, D. B., Relman, D. A., & Brown, P. O. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050177 · Cited by 2,877
Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy
Penders, J., Thijs, C., Vink, C., Stelma, F. F., Snijders, B., Kummeling, I., van den Brandt, P. A., & Stobberingh, E. E. (2006) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2824 · Cited by 2,232
The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity
Wu, H.-J., & Wu, E. (2012) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.19320 · Cited by 1,426
Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract
Mackie, R. I., Sghir, A., & Gaskins, H. R. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1035s · Cited by 1,360
Metadata
- Authors
- Stark, P. L., & Lee, A.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1982-05-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-203
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2131291912
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Keywords
- infant gut microbiota, breastfeeding, infant formula, large bowel, bacterial community succession, Bifidobacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Bacteroides, Clostridia, anaerobic streptococci, facultative anaerobes, solid food introduction, infant nutrition
- MeSH terms
- Actinomycetaceae, Aerobiosis, Aging, Anaerobiosis, Bacteroides, Bottle Feeding, Breast Feeding, Clostridium, Enterobacteriaceae, Feces, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intestine, Large, Prospective Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review