Cited by 8Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionAlgal biology and biofuel productionPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Improving productivity of citramalate from CO2 by Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 through design of experiment

Open access
Faulkner, Matthew, Andrews, Fraser, Scrutton, Nigel·2024·Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

Abstract

Background: Cyanobacteria have long been suggested as an industrial chassis for the conversion of carbon dioxide to products as part of a circular bioeconomy. The slow growth, carbon fixation rates, and limits of carbon partitioning between biomass and product in cyanobacteria must be overcome to fully realise this industrial potential. Typically, flux towards heterologous pathways is limited by the availability of core metabolites. Citramalate is produced in a single enzymatic step through the condensation of the central metabolites pyruvate and acetyl-CoA; improvements in citramalate productivity can, therefore, be used as a measure of overcoming this limitation. Furthermore, citramalate is a useful biomaterial precursor and provides a route to renewable methyl methacrylate and poly(methyl methacrylate), which is often traded as Perspex or Plexiglas. Results: Here, we describe a phenomenon where the concerted optimisation of process parameters significantly increased citramalate production in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Design of experiment principles were used to determine the optima for each parameter and the interplay between multiple parameters. This approach facilitated a ~ 23-fold increase in citramalate titre from initial unoptimised experiments. The process of scale-up from batch cultures to 0.5, 2, and 5 L photobioreactors is described. At the 2-L scale, citramalate titres from carbon dioxide reached 6.35 g/L with space–time yields of 1.59 g/L/day whilst 5-L PBRs yielded 3.96 ± 0.23 g/L with a productivity of 0.99 ± 0.06 g/L/day. We believe the decrease in productivity from 2-L to 5-L scale was likely due to the increased pathlength and shading for light delivery reducing incident light per cell. However, changes in productivity and growth characteristics are not uncommon when scaling up biotechnology processes and have numerous potential causes. Conclusions: This work demonstrates that the use of a process parameter control regime can ameliorate precursor limitation and enhance citramalate production. Since pyruvate and/or acetyl-CoA give rise to numerous products of biotechnological interest, the workflow presented here could be employed to optimise flux towards other heterologous pathways. Understanding the factors controlling and thus increasing carbon partitioning to product will help progress cyanobacteria as part of a carbon–neutral circular bioeconomy. This is the first study using design of experiment to optimise overall carbon fixation rate and carbon partitioning to product, with the goal of improving the performance of a cyanobacterium as a host for biological carbon capture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13068-024-02589-z

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Phyco-Flow system integrates optical and spectroscopic sensors that allow biomass concentration to be assessed based on light transmission and absorption in the visible and near-infrared range.

    “This system integrates optical and spectroscopic sensors that allow the biomass concentration to be assessed based on light transmission and absorption in the visible and near-infrared range.”

    From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [256]

    The Results and discussion section names Phyco-Flow only as an example of a serpentine reactor; it does not describe its sensors. The Materials and methods section uses optical density at 720 nm to assess biomass in different reactors. Searches for Phyco-Flow, spectroscopic sensors, and visible/near-infrared transmission found no passage supporting the claimed features of Phyco-Flow. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Phyco-Flow uses AI algorithms to predict crop growth and automatically regulate CO2 supply, which improves photosynthetic efficiency and biomass accumulation.

    “In addition, Phyco-Flow uses AI algorithms to predict crop growth and automatically regulate CO2 supply, which improves photosynthetic efficiency and biomass accumulation [256].”

    From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [256]

    The Results and discussion section names Phyco-Flow only as an example of a serpentine reactor and says the study’s workflow has not been tested in such reactors. The Methods describe predictive modelling of experimental conditions, but our copy does not say that Phyco-Flow uses AI to predict growth or automatically regulate CO2, or that it improves photosynthetic efficiency and biomass accumulation. No page numbers were provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Faulkner, M., Andrews, F., & Scrutton, N.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Faulkner, Matthew
  • Scrutton, Nigel
Venue
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
Published
2024-12-05
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
143-143
ISSN
2731-3654 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405059060
Cited by
8
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S01778X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, cyanobacteria, CO2 fixation, process parameter optimization, experimental design, scale-up, photobioreactors, pyruvate, acetyl-CoA, carbon allocation, methyl methacrylate, circular bioeconomy, bioprocess productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review