The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Capsule polysaccharide is a bacterial decoy for antimicrobial peptides
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (APs) are important host weapons against infections. Nearly all APs are cationic and their microbicidal action is initiated through interactions with the anionic bacterial surface. It is known that pathogens have developed countermeasures to resist these agents by reducing the negative charge of membranes, by active efflux and by proteolytic degradation. Here we uncover a new strategy of resistance based on the neutralization of the bactericidal activity of APs by anionic bacterial capsule polysaccharide (CPS). Purified CPSs from Klebsiella pneumoniae K2, Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 3 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa increased the resistance to polymyxin B of an unencapsulated K. pneumoniae mutant. Furthermore, these CPSs increased the MICs of polymyxin B and human neutrophil alpha-defensin 1 (HNP-1) for unencapsulated K. pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa PAO1. Polymyxin B or HNP-1 released CPS from capsulated K. pneumoniae, S. pneumoniae serotype 3 and P. aeruginosa overexpressing CPS. Moreover, this material also reduced the bactericidal activity of APs. We postulate that APs may trigger in vivo the release of CPS, which in turn will protect bacteria against APs. We found that anionic CPSs, but not cationic or uncharged ones, blocked the bactericidal activity of APs by binding them, thereby reducing the amount of peptides reaching the bacterial surface. Supporting this, polycations inhibited such interaction and the bactericidal activity was restored. We postulate that trapping of APs by anionic CPSs is an additional selective virulence trait of these molecules, which could be considered as bacterial decoys for APs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane
Vaara, M. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.56.3.395-411.1992 · Cited by 1,879
Tuning inflammation and immunity by chemokine sequestration: decoys and more
Mantovani, A., Bonecchi, R., & Locati, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1964 · Cited by 481
Cited by
Poirel, L., Jayol, A., & Nordmann, P. (2017) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00064-16 · Cited by 1,447
Beceiro, A., Tomás, M., & Bou, G. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00059-12 · Cited by 1,070
Interactions of commensal and pathogenic microorganisms with the intestinal mucosal barrier
Martens, E. C., Neumann, M., & Desai, M. S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0036-x · Cited by 711
Antibiotic Modulation of Capsular Exopolysaccharide and Virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii
Geisinger, E., & Isberg, R. R. (2015) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004691 · Cited by 548
Gan, B. H., Gaynord, J., Rowe, S. M., Deingruber, T., & Spring, D. R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00729c · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Llobet, E., Tomás, J. M., & Bengoechea, J. A.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3877-3886
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2171857175
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capsule polysaccharide is a bacterial decoy for antimicrobial peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.2008/022301-0
- The paper
- Llobet, E., Tomás, J. M., & Bengoechea, J. A. (2008). Capsule polysaccharide is a bacterial decoy for antimicrobial peptides. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2008/022301-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.