PreprintCited by 78Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MOGSA: integrative single sample gene-set analysis of multiple omics data

Open access
Meng, Chen, Basunia, Azfar, Peters, Bjoern, Gholami, Amin Moghaddas, Kuster, Bernhard, Culhane, Aedín C·2016·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Preprint — published as 10.1074/mcp.tir118.001251

Abstract

Gene set analysis (GSA) summarizes individual molecular measurements to more interpretable pathways or gene sets and has become an indispensable step in the interpretation of large scale omics data. However, GSA methods are limited to the analysis of single omics data. Here, we introduce a new computation method termed multi-omics gene set analysis (MOGSA), a multivariate single sample gene-set analysis method that integrates multiple experimental and molecular data types measured over the same set of samples. The method learns a low dimensional representation of most variant correlated features (genes, proteins, etc.) across multiple omics data sets, transforms the features onto the same scale and calculates an integrated gene set score from the most informative features in each data type. MOGSA does not require filtering data to the intersection of features (gene IDs), therefore, all molecular features, including those that lack annotation may be included in the analysis. We demonstrate that integrating multiple diverse sources of molecular data increases the power to discover subtle changes in gene-sets and may reduce the impact of unreliable information in any single data type. Using simulated data, we show that integrative analysis with MOGSA outperforms other single sample GSA methods. We applied MOGSA to three studies with experimental data. First, we used NCI60 transcriptome and proteome data to demonstrate the benefit of removing a source of noise in the omics data. Second, we discovered similarities and differences in mRNA, protein and phosphorylation profiles of induced pluripotent and embryonic stem cell lines. We demonstrate how to assess the influence of each data type or feature to a MOGSA gene set score. Finally, we report that three molecular subtypes are robustly discovered when copy number variation and mRNA profiling data of 308 bladder cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas are integrated using MOGSA. MOGSA is available in the Bioconductor R package “mogsa”.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/046904

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1038/nrg2934 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nrg2626 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nature13319 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2017, Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells, Nature Methods, 14, 865, 10.1038/nmeth.4380 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nbt.3973 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ng.2764 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0219 · DOI
  9. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nature08460 · DOI
  11. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-225 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000217 · DOI
  13. 2018, Enter the Matrix: Factorization Uncovers Knowledge from Omics, Trends in Genetics, 34, 790, 10.1016/j.tig.2018.07.003 · DOI
  14. 2007, Capturing Heterogeneity in Gene Expression Studies by Surrogate Variable Analysis, PLOS Genetics, 3, e161, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030161 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1186/1471-2105-15-162 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-32 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/pmic.200600898 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-34 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/1471-2105-4-59 · DOI
  20. 2013, Multiple factor analysis: principal component analysis for multitable and multiblock data sets, WIREs Comp Stat, 5, 149, 10.1002/wics.1246 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/bib/bbv108 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.01.008 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-277 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.018 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2011, Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells, Nature Methods, 8, 821, 10.1038/nmeth.1699 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/pmic.201000616 · DOI
  27. 2014, TCGA-Assembler: open-source software for retrieving and processing TCGA data, Nature Methods, 11, 599, 10.1038/nmeth.2956 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkq622 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp692 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-r41 · DOI
  31. 10.1023/A:1023949509487 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq170 · DOI
  33. Şenbabaoğlu, Y. , Michailidis, G. , and Li, J. Z. (2014) Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery. Sci. Rep. 4, · DOI
  34. 10.1198/106186005X59243 · DOI
  35. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0077-T · DOI
  36. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.15252/msb.20178124 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti367 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nrg2825 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2015, Systematic pan-cancer analysis of tumour purity, Nature Communications, 6, 8971, 10.1038/ncomms9971 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nbt.3498 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/nrc3817 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.007 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.1318376111 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.009 · DOI
  47. 2016, moCluster: Identifying Joint Patterns Across Multiple Omics Data Sets, J. Proteome Res, 15, 755, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00824 · DOI
  48. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4213 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.035 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/2347949 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.0530258100 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Hastie, T. , Tibshirani, R. , Eisen, M. B. , Alizadeh, A. , Levy, R. , Staudt, L. , Chan, W. C. , Botstein, D. , and Brown, P. (2000) “Gene shaving” as a method for identifying distinct sets of genes with similar expression patterns. Genome Biol. 1, RESEARCH0003 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1073/pnas.150242097 · DOI
  54. Brazma, A. , and Culhane, A. C. (2005) Algorithms for gene expression analysis. Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics, · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Meng, C., Basunia, A., Peters, B., Gholami, A. M., Kuster, B., & Culhane, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gholami, Amin Moghaddas
  • Culhane, Aedín C
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2016-04-03
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
S153-S168
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954876467
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-15–1-, W81XWH, W81XWH1510013)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (CA101942)
  • National Institutes of Health (W81XWH, AI111224)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA101942, CA101942, U01CA214846)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI111224, U19AI109755)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
multi-omics integration, pathway enrichment, low-dimensional feature representation, transcriptome-proteome integration, noise reduction, stem cell lines, copy number variation, mRNA expression
MeSH terms
RNA-Seq, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Humans, RNA, Messenger, Mass Spectrometry, Cluster Analysis, Genomics, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review