PreprintCited by 87COVID-19 epidemiological studiesData-Driven Disease SurveillanceSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Estimating the Cumulative Incidence of COVID-19 in the United States Using Four Complementary Approaches

Open access
Lu, Fred S., Nguyen, Andre T., Link, Nicholas B., Davis, Jessica T., Chinazzi, Matteo, Xiong, Xinyue, Vespignani, Alessandro, Lipsitch, Marc +1 more·2020·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008994

Abstract

Effectively designing and evaluating public health responses to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic requires accurate estimation of the prevalence of COVID-19 across the United States (US). Equipment shortages and varying testing capabilities have however hindered the usefulness of the official reported positive COVID-19 case counts. We introduce four complementary approaches to estimate the cumulative incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 in each state in the US as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, using a combination of excess influenza-like illness reports, COVID-19 test statistics, COVID-19 mortality reports, and a spatially structured epidemic model. Instead of relying on the estimate from a single data source or method that may be biased, we provide multiple estimates, each relying on different assumptions and data sources. Across our four approaches emerges the consistent conclusion that on April 4, 2020, the estimated case count was 5 to 50 times higher than the official positive test counts across the different states. Nationally, our estimates of COVID-19 symptomatic cases as of April 4 have a likely range of 2.2 to 4.9 million, with possibly as many as 8.1 million cases, up to 26 times greater than the cumulative confirmed cases of about 311,000. Extending our method to May 16, 2020, we estimate that cumulative symptomatic incidence ranges from 6.0 to 10.3 million, as opposed to 1.5 million positive test counts. The proposed combination of approaches may prove useful in assessing the burden of COVID-19 during resurgences in the US and other countries with comparable surveillance systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.04.18.20070821

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

23 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, F. S., Nguyen, A. T., Link, N. B., Davis, J. T., Chinazzi, M., Xiong, X., Vespignani, A., Lipsitch, M., & Santillana, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Santillana, Mauricio
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-04-23
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
e1008994-e1008994
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3168278554
Cited by
87
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 14
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) (public-domain)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Sanofi
  • National Institutes of Health (COVID-19)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM130668)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T32LM012411)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cumulative incidence, underreporting of cases, influenza-like illness surveillance, COVID-19 mortality, United States, Puerto Rico, Washington, D.C., public health response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review