Cited by 3,694COVID-19 epidemiological studiesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsTravel-related health issues

The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak

Open access
Chinazzi, Matteo, Davis, Jessica T., Ajelli, Marco, Gioannini, Corrado, Litvinova, Maria, Merler, Stefano, Pastore y Piontti, Ana, Mu, Kunpeng +8 more·2020·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivated by the rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in mainland China, we use a global metapopulation disease transmission model to project the impact of travel limitations on the national and international spread of the epidemic. The model is calibrated on the basis of internationally reported cases and shows that, at the start of the travel ban from Wuhan on 23 January 2020, most Chinese cities had already received many infected travelers. The travel quarantine of Wuhan delayed the overall epidemic progression by only 3 to 5 days in mainland China but had a more marked effect on the international scale, where case importations were reduced by nearly 80% until mid-February. Modeling results also indicate that sustained 90% travel restrictions to and from mainland China only modestly affect the epidemic trajectory unless combined with a 50% or higher reduction of transmission in the community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aba9757

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most reviewed studies acknowledged that quarantine is one of the first public health measures to control and prevent further spread of respiratory infections caused by coronavirus.

    “Most of the studies reviewed acknowledged that quarantine is one of the first public health measures to control and prevent further spread of respirational infections caused by the coronavirus (3, 11, 14, 22).”

    From Definitions and psychological impacts of quarantine and strategies to reduce it: A review paper (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that the Wuhan travel quarantine modestly delayed COVID-19’s spread, supporting the narrower point that quarantine can help limit spread. It does not characterize quarantine as one of the first public-health measures or establish that claim for coronavirus respiratory infections generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The reviewed studies referred to travel restrictions as travel quarantine, which included restriction or cancellation of overland air travel and public and private vehicles to areas of high outbreak risk.

    “These studies referred to travel restrictions as travel quarantine, which included the restriction or cancellation of overland air travel and public and private vehicles to areas of a high risk of the outbreak (14).”

    From Definitions and psychological impacts of quarantine and strategies to reduce it: A review paper (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Abstract calls the Wuhan travel ban a “travel quarantine,” and the International travel restrictions and transmissibility reduction section reports suspended or limited flights. The paper does not define travel quarantine as including restrictions on overland travel or public and private vehicles. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using disease simulation on aggregated inter-province movement counts in China as derived from Baidu location based services, travel restrictions in Wuhan introduced on 23 January 2020 reduced the number of cases exported internationally by 70-80% until mid February 2020.

    “Using disease simulation on aggregated inter-province movement counts in China as derived from Baidu location based services [101] has shown that the travel restrictions in Wuhan introduced on 23 January 2020 had reduced the number of cases exported internationally by 70–80% until mid February 2020.”
  • Several studies across different countries have shown lockdowns' effectiveness.

    “Several studies across different countries have shown their effectiveness [101,102].”
  • South Korea's Trace strategy required affected travelers to undergo compulsory self-quarantine for 14 days before any swab test was issued.

    “Affected travelers are required to undergo compulsory self-quarantine for 14 days (Chinazzi et al., 2020) before any test of swab is issued.”

    From IoMT amid COVID-19 pandemic: Application, architecture, technology, and security (2021) · cites this paper as Chinazzi et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]J. A. Backer, D. Klinkenberg, J. Wallinga, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/01/28/2020.01.27.20018986 (2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chinazzi, M., Davis, J. T., Ajelli, M., Gioannini, C., Litvinova, M., Merler, S., Pastore y Piontti, A., Mu, K., Rossi, L., Sun, K., Viboud, C., Xiong, X., Yu, H., Halloran, M. E., Longini, I. M., & Vespignani, A.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
  • Institute for Scientific Interchange (IT)
  • Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Fogarty International Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Longini, Ira M.
  • Vespignani, Alessandro
Venue
Science
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
368
Issue
6489
Pages
395-400
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3010131837
Cited by
3,694
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 244 · 2023: 405 · 2022: 644 · 2021: 1101 · 2020: 1036 · 2019: 1
FWCI
127.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (H2020, MIDAS-U54-GM111274)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU‐H2020)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM111274)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, travel restrictions, metapopulation model, epidemic projection, international spread, quarantine, epidemic control
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Communicable Diseases, Imported, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, China, Computer Simulation, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Quarantine, Travel, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Coronavirus Infections, Internationality, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review