PreprintCited by 5Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsNuclear Structure and FunctionDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nucleosome structural variations in interphase and metaphase chromosomes

Open access
Arimura, Yasuhiro, Shih, Rochelle M., Froom, Ruby, Funabiki, Hironori·2020·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.08.010 · Paper page

Abstract

Summary: Structural heterogeneity of nucleosomes in functional chromosomes is unknown. Here we report cryo-EM structures of nucleosomes isolated from interphase and metaphase chromosomes at up to 3.4 Å resolution. Averaged chromosomal nucleosome structures are highly similar to canonical left-handed recombinant nucleosome crystal structures, with DNA being selectively stabilized at two defined locations. Compared to free mono-nucleosomes, which exhibit diverse linker DNA angles and large structural variations in H3 and H4, chromosomal nucleosome structures are much more uniform, characterized by a closed linker DNA angle with interactions between the H2A C-terminal tail and DNA. Exclusively for metaphase nucleosomes, structures of the linker histone H1.8 at the on-dyad position of nucleosomes can be reconstituted at 4.4 Å resolution. We also report diverse minor nucleosome structural variants with rearranged core histone configurations, which are more prevalent in metaphase than in interphase chromosomes. This study presents structural characteristics of nucleosomes in interphase and mitotic chromosomes. Highlights: 3.4~ Å resolution nucleosome structures from interphase and metaphase chromosomes Nucleosome structures in chromosomes are more uniform than in free mono-nucleosomes Histone H1.8 binds to the nucleosome dyad axis in metaphase chromosomes Nucleosome structural variants are more prevalent in metaphase than in interphase NOTES TO READERS: We would like to emphasize the importance of supplemental movies S1-S3, which should greatly help readers to understand characteristics of the nucleosome structural variants that we report in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.11.12.380386

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 124

  1. 10.1128/MCB.15.3.1405 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41467-019-13889-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2019, CENP -C unwraps the human CENP -A nucleosome through the H2A C-terminal tail, EMBO Rep., 20, 1
  4. 10.1073/pnas.1413990112 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3396 · DOI
  6. Arimura, Y. , Tachiwana, H. , Oda, T. , Sato, M. , and Kurumizaka, H. (2012). Structural analysis of the hexasome, lacking one histone H2A/H2B dimer from the conventional nucleosome. Biochemistry 51. · DOI
  7. Arimura, Y. , Ikura, M. , Fujita, R. , Noda, M. , Kobayashi, W. , Horikoshi, N. , Sun, J. , Shi, L. , Kusakabe, M. , Harata, M. , et al. (2018). Cancer-associated mutations of histones H2B, H3.1 and H2A.Z.1 affect the structure and stability of the nucleosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 46. · DOI
  8. Arimura, Y. , Tachiwana, H. , Takagi, H. , Hori, T. , Kimura, H. , Fukagawa, T. , and Kurumizaka, H. (2019). The CENP-A centromere targeting domain facilitates H4K20 monomethylation in the nucleosome by structural polymorphism. Nat. Commun. 10. · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41586-018-0021-6 · DOI
  10. 2001, Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 98, 10037 LP, 10.1073/pnas.181342398 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.037 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.012 · DOI
  13. 2019, Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs, Nat. Methods, 16, 1153, 10.1038/s41592-019-0575-8 · DOI
  14. 2018, Histone octamer rearranges to adapt to DNA unwrapping, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 25, 101, 10.1038/s41594-017-0005-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-018-02974-x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2018, The in situ structures of mono-, di-, and trinucleosomes in human heterochromatin, Mol. Biol. Cell, 29, 2450, 10.1091/mbc.E18-05-0331 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1720476115 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.08.002 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.aat4346 · DOI
  20. 10.15252/embj.201899894 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/nar/gks261 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkw708 · DOI
  23. 2018, Post-translational modifications of H2A histone variants and their role in cancer, Cancers (Basel)., 10, 1
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkh381 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.1103124 · DOI
  26. 10.1006/dbio.1994.1042 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.09.002 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0810057105 · DOI
  29. 2018, Nucleosome conformational variability in solution and in interphase nuclei evidenced by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, 9189, 10.1093/nar/gky670 · DOI
  30. 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Eustermann, S. , Schall, K. , Kostrewa, D. , Lakomek, K. , Strauss, M. , Moldt, M. , and Hopfner, K. (2018). remodelling by the INO80 complex. Nature 1–6. · DOI
  32. 2015, CENP-C reshapes and stabilizes CENP-A nucleosomes at the centromere, Science, 348, 699 LP, 10.1126/science.1259308 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.028 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nature24046 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1370 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature09372 · DOI
  37. 10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034512 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/nar/gkt314 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1816936115 · DOI
  40. Gibcus, J.H. , Samejima, K. , Goloborodko, A. , Samejima, I. , Naumova, N. , Nuebler, J. , Kanemaki, M.T. , Xie, L. , Paulson, J.R. , Earnshaw, W.C. , et al. (2018). A pathway for mitotic chromosome formation. Science 359. · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.037 · DOI
  42. 10.7554/eLife.12248 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.022 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.009 · DOI
  45. 2020, Cryo-EM structure of SWI/SNF complex bound to a nucleosome, Nature, 579, 452, 10.1038/s41586-020-2087-1 · DOI
  46. 2015, Distribution of histone H4 modifications as revealed by a panel of specific monoclonal antibodies, Chromosom. Res., 23, 753, 10.1007/s10577-015-9486-4 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.aaz9761 · DOI
  48. 10.15252/embr.201540749 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90254-2 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.030 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.1717509115 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nmeth1139 · DOI
  53. 10.15252/msb.20167412 · DOI
  54. Kato, D. , Osakabe, A. , Arimura, Y. , Mizukami, Y. , Horikoshi, N. , Saikusa, K. , Akashi, S. , Nishimura, Y. , Park, S.-Y. , Nogami, J. , et al. (2017). Crystal structure of the overlapping dinucleosome composed of hexasome and octasome. Science 356. · DOI
  55. 10.1126/science.1189505 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/287509a0 · DOI
  57. 2020, Human Condensin I and II Drive Extensive ATP-Dependent Compaction of Nucleosome-Bound DNA, Mol. Cell, 79, 99, 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.026 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.gde.2020.02.022 · DOI
  59. 10.7554/eLife.06633 · DOI
  60. 10.1126/science.aau9904 · DOI
  61. 2019, Integrative biology of native cell extracts: A new era for structural characterization of life processes, Biol. Chem., 400, 831, 10.1515/hsz-2018-0445 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI
  63. 10.4161/cc.6.17.4631 · DOI
  64. 2019, Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: Recent developments in Phenix, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol., 75, 861, 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1038/nature22036 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/s41586-019-1820-0 · DOI
  67. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1494 · DOI
  68. 10.1101/gad.1749309 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/38444 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1038/nrm3382 · DOI
  71. 10.1093/jb/mvm214 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.03.001 · DOI
  73. 10.1083/jcb.200503031 · DOI
  74. 2012, The crystal structure of human α2-macroglobulin reveals a unique molecular cage, Angew. Chemie-Int. Ed., 51, 3340, 10.1002/anie.201108015 · DOI
  75. 10.1021/cr500373h · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)60298-8 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/s41594-019-0330-y · DOI
  79. 10.1038/nature14548 · DOI
  80. 10.1038/emboj.2012.35 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.014 · DOI
  82. Ou, H.D. , Phan, S. , Deerinck, T.J. , Thor, A. , Ellisman, M.H. , and O’Shea, C.C. (2017). ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells. Science 357. · DOI
  83. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  84. 10.1101/2020.04.08.032466 · DOI
  85. 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1073/pnas.74.5.1879 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.054 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1038/nature20781 · DOI
  89. 10.1073/pnas.0601212103 · DOI
  90. Samejima, K. , Booth, D.G. , Ogawa, H. , Paulson, J.R. , Xie, L. , Watson, C.A. , Platani, M. , Kanemaki, M.T. , and Earnshaw, W.C. (2018). Functional analysis after rapid degradation of condensins and 3D-EM reveals chromatin volume is uncoupled from chromosome architecture in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 131. · DOI
  91. 10.1038/s41586-019-1669-2 · DOI
  92. 10.1038/nature03686 · DOI
  93. 10.1073/pnas.1108268108 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1083/jcb.117.5.921 · DOI
  96. 10.1073/pnas.0812207106 · DOI
  97. 10.1038/nprot.2006.468 · DOI
  98. Skrajna, A. , Goldfarb, D. , Kedziora, K.M. , Cousins, E.M. , Grant, G.D. , Spangler, C.J. , Barbour, E.H. , Yan, X. , Hathaway, N.A. , Brown, N.G. , et al. (2020). Comprehensive nucleosome interactome screen establishes fundamental principles of nucleosome binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 1–18. · DOI
  99. 10.1126/science.1251413 · DOI
  100. 10.1038/302548a0 · DOI
  101. 10.1073/pnas.1805943115 · DOI
  102. 10.1101/gad.1412706 · DOI
  103. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.022 · DOI
  104. 2020, Separating distinct structures of multiple macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM projections, J. Struct. Biol., 209, 107416, 10.1016/j.jsb.2019.107416 · DOI
  105. Wal, M. , and Pugh, B.F. (2012). Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positions in yeast using high-resolution MNase ChIP-Seq (Elsevier Inc.). · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.11.005 · DOI
  107. 10.1074/jbc.M115.709212 · DOI
  108. 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.014 · DOI
  110. 10.1126/science.1244508 · DOI
  111. Willhoft, O. , Ghoneim, M. , Lin, C.L. , Chua, E.Y.D. , Wilkinson, M. , Chaban, Y. , Ayala, R. , McCormack, E.A. , Ocloo, L. , Rueda, D.S. , et al. (2018). Structure and dynamics of the yeast SWR1-nucleosome complex. Science 362. · DOI
  112. 2020, Elucidating the influence of linker histone variants on chromatosome dynamics and energetics, Nucleic Acids Res., 48, 3591, 10.1093/nar/gkaa121 · DOI
  113. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.044 · DOI
  114. 10.1038/s41594-019-0199 · DOI
  115. 10.1093/nar/gkr005 · DOI
  116. 10.1126/science.aay0033 · DOI
  117. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006686 · DOI
  118. Zhiteneva, A. , Bonfiglio, J.J. , Makarov, A. , Colby, T. , Vagnarelli, P. , Schirmer, E.C. , Matic, I. , and Earnshaw, W.C. (2017). Mitotic post-translational modifications of histones promote chromatin compaction in vitro. Open Biol. 7. · DOI
  119. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.025 · DOI
  120. 10.1038/s41467-019-09078-0 · DOI
  121. Zhou, M. , Dai, L. , Li, C. , Shi, L. , Huang, Y. , Guo, Z. , Wu, F. , Zhu, P. , and Zhou, Z. (2020). Structural basis of nucleosome dynamics modulation by histone variants H2A.B and H2A.Z.2.2. EMBO J. 1–16. · DOI
  122. 10.1038/nsmb.2845 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.str.2008.12.016 · DOI
  124. 2018, Direct Observation of H3–H4 Octasome by High-Speed AFM, Chem. - A Eur. J., 24, 15998, 10.1002/chem.201804010 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Arimura, Y., Shih, R. M., Froom, R., & Funabiki, H.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Arimura, Yasuhiro
  • Funabiki, Hironori
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-11-12
OpenAlex
W3100212633
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM132111)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
nucleosome structure, chromatin, interphase chromosomes, metaphase chromosomes, cryo-electron microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review