Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Downtown Diet: a global meta-analysis of urbanization on consumption patterns of vertebrate predators

Gámez, Siria, Potts, Abigail, Mills, Kirby L., Allen, Aurelia A., Holman, Allyson, Randon, Peggy, Linson, Olivia, Harris, Nyeema C.·2020

Abstract

Predation is a fundamental ecological process that shapes communities and drives long-term evolutionary dynamics. As the world rapidly urbanizes, it is critical to understand how the built environment and other human perturbations alter predation across taxa. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the effects of urban environments on three components of trophic ecology in predators: dietary species richness (DSR), dietary evenness (DEV), and stable isotopic ratios (δ 13 C and δ 15 N IR). We then evaluated whether intensity of anthropogenic pressure, using the human footprint index (HFI), explained variation in the effect sizes of dietary attributes using a meta-regression. We calculated Hedges’ g effect sizes from 44 studies including 11,986 samples across 40 predatory species in 39 cities globally. The direction and magnitude of effect sizes varied between predator taxonomic groups with reptile diets exhibiting the most sensitivity to urbanization. Effect sizes revealed that predators in cities had comparable DSR, DEV, and nitrogen ratios, though carbon consumption was significantly higher. We found that HFI did not explain variation in effect sizes, a result consistent between the 1993 and 2009 editions of this metric. Our study provides the first assessment of how urbanization has perturbed predator-prey interactions for multiple taxa at a global scale, revealing that the functional role of predators is conserved in cities and urbanization does not inherently relax predation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.12.19.423628

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1073/pnas.1606034114 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/biosci/biaa079 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1073/pnas.1508681112 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/fee.1480 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/ecy.1535 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00887.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1644/11-MAMM-S-166.1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2002, Taxonomic chauvinism, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 1, 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02381-3 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1606036114 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/s10682-019-10008-1 · doi:10.1007/s10682-019-10008-1
  11. 10.1111/1365-2656.13266 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/eva.13081 · DOI
  13. Denno, R. F. , et al. (2007). Plant-mediated interactions in herbivorous insects: mechanisms, symmetry, and challenging the paradigms of competition past. In P. W. Price , T. Ohgushi , & T. P. Craig (Eds.), Ecological Communities: Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs (pp. 19–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542701.003
  14. 10.1111/jzo.12443 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/1365-2435.13114 · DOI
  16. 2018, A meta-analysis indicates reduced predation pressure with increasing urbanization, Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 54, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05925.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/geb.12130 · DOI
  19. Fidino, M. , et al. (2020). Landscape-scale differences among cities alter common species’ responses to urbanization. Ecological Applications, n/a(n/a), e2253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2253 · DOI
  20. 10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/096228029300200202 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.02.011 · DOI
  23. 2012, Food Habits of the Magellanic Horned Owl (B ubo virginianus magellanicus) at Southernmost Patagonia, Argentina, Journal of Raptor Research, 46, 401, 10.3356/JRR-12-22.1 · doi:10.3356/jrr-12-22.1
  24. 10.1111/mec.14375 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10980-019-00824-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/icb/icy052 · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152494 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/1365-2656.12967 · DOI
  29. 2019, Landscapes of Fear: Spatial Patterns of Risk Perception and Response, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34, 355, 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.aar7121 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/15693430412331291698 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1017/S1751731118001349 · DOI
  33. 10.3389/fevo.2018.00136 · DOI
  34. 2012, Trends in conservation biology: Progress or procrastination in a new millennium?, Biological Conservation, 153, 153, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.011 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1007/s11252-020-00977-5 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.aam8327 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1007/s11252-020-01061-8 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/s41467-020-18045-z · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01087.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/biosci/bix079 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations (Vol. 2): Princeton University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/brv.12012 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1073/pnas.2012774117 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1111/ele.13374 · doi:10.1111/ele.13374
  46. 10.1098/rspb.2018.2120 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41893-019-0436-6 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1111/1365-2664.13358 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/ecog.01128 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/fee.2126 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1002/ece3.4576 · doi:10.1002/ece3.4576
  52. 10.1007/s00442-014-3205-2 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-362.1 · DOI
  54. 2009, Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition, Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 189
  55. 10.1007/s11252-017-0727-5 · DOI
  56. 10.1890/10-0863.1 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1038/ncomms9877 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1177/0962280217718867 · DOI
  59. 10.1126/science.aay4497 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1098/rspb.2019.2497 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01511.x · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1002/ece3.6584 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1038/s41598-017-13277-4 · DOI
  64. 10.1073/pnas.1211658109 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1086/323589 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 1997, Earthworm abundance and nitrogen mineralization rates along an urban-rural land use gradient, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29, 427
  67. 10.1038/ncomms10698 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Terborgh, J. E. , J. A. (Ed.) (2010). Trophic Cascades: Predators, Prey, and the Changing Dynamics of Nature: Island Press.
  69. 10.1098/rspb.2019.2182 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1126/science.aam9712 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1007/s11252-010-0136-5 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/sdata.2016.67 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1002/ecs2.1239 · DOI
  75. 2006, Stable isotopes as one of nature’s ecological recorders, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 408, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.mambio.2017.02.004 · DOI
  77. 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00152 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Gámez, S., Potts, A., Mills, K. L., Allen, A. A., Holman, A., Randon, P., Linson, O., & Harris, N. C.
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-12-21
Cited by
1
References
1
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Downtown Diet: a global meta-analysis of urbanization on consumption patterns of vertebrate predators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2020.12.19.423628
The paper
Gámez, S., Potts, A., Mills, K. L., Allen, A. A., Holman, A., Randon, P., Linson, O., & Harris, N. C. (2020). Downtown Diet: a global meta-analysis of urbanization on consumption patterns of vertebrate predators. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.19.423628

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.