PreprintCited by 126SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmune responses and vaccinationsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccination in Immunocompromised Patients: An Observational, Prospective Cohort Study Interim Analysis

Open access
Haidar, Ghady, Agha, Mounzer, Lukanski, Amy, Linstrum, Kelsey, Troyan, Rachel, Bilderback, Andrew, Rothenberger, Scott, McMahon, Deborah K. +24 more·2021·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Preprint — published as 10.1093/cid/ciac103

Abstract

Objectives: Immunocompromised patients were excluded from COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. The objectives of the study were to measure antibody responses, levels, and neutralization capability after COVID-19 vaccination among immunocompromised patients and compare these variables to those of immunocompetent healthcare workers. Methods: This is an interim analysis of an ongoing observational, prospective cohort study which launched on April 14, 2021 across Western Pennsylvania. Participants were healthy healthcare workers (HCW) and immunocompromised patients who had completed their COVID-19 vaccination series. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 were not eligible. Serum was collected to measure for the presence of IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein using a semi-quantitative assay; antibody levels were available for comparisons. A quasi-random subset of patients was selected for pseudovirus neutralization assays. Seropositivity with 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals and distribution of antibody levels were measured. To identify risk factors for seronegativity, clinical characteristics were univariately compared between antibody reactive and non-reactive individuals within the immunocompromised group. Results: 107 HCW and 489 immunocompromised patients were enrolled. Compared to HCWs, seropositivity was significantly lower (p<.001) among immunocompromised patients with Solid organ transplant (SOT), autoimmune, hematological malignancies, and solid tumors (HCW=98.1%; SOT=37.2%; autoimmune=83.8%; hematological malignancies=54.7%; and solid tumor=82.4%, p < 0.05). Over 94% of patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus were seropositive. Among seropositive patients, antibody levels were much lower among SOT (4.5 [2.1,13.1], p=.020). Neutralization titers tightly correlated with antibody levels (Spearman r = 0.91, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the heterogeneity of the humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccines based on underlying immunosuppressive condition and highlight an urgent need to optimize and individualize COVID-19 prevention in these patients. These findings also have implications on public health guidance, particularly given revised Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations permitting vaccinated individuals to abandon masking and social distancing in most settings. Future studies are warranted to determine assessment of cellular immunity, longitudinal measurement of immune responses, and the safety and efficacy of revaccination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.06.28.21259576

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regardless of the vaccine received, reductions in vaccine-elicited humoral immunity is likely to be clinically significant for persons with impaired immunity as a result of underlying disease, immunosuppressive drugs or older age.

    “Moreover, regardless of the vaccine received, reductions in vaccine-elicited humoral immunity is likely to be clinically significant for persons with impaired immunity as a result of underlying disease, immunosuppressive drugs or older age [241][242][243][244] .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr, Falsey AR, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2439-2450.
  2. Zilla M, Wheeler BJ, Keetch C, et al. Variable performance of commercially available EUA SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in critically ill and mildly symptomatic patients assessed at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 March; 155(3): 343-353.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haidar, G., Agha, M., Lukanski, A., Linstrum, K., Troyan, R., Bilderback, A., Rothenberger, S., McMahon, D. K., Crandall, M., Enick, P. N., Sobolewksi, M., Collins, K., Schwartz, M. B., Dueker, J. M., Silveira, F. P., Keebler, M. E., Humar, A., Luketich, J. D., Morrell, M. R., Pilewski, J. M., McDyer, J. F., Pappu, B., Ferris, R. L., Marks, S. M., Klamar-Blain, C., Parikh, U. M., Heaps, A., Kip, P. L., Wells, A., Minnier, T., Angus, D., & Mellors, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Haidar, Ghady
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-06-30
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
e630-e644
ISSN
1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210317504
Cited by
126
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 13
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • DSF Charitable Foundation
  • Gilead Sciences (COVID-19)
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health (COVID-19)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA047904)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (COVID-19, K23AI154546)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccines, immunocompromised patients, humoral immune response, seropositivity, antibody levels, neutralizing antibodies, solid organ transplant recipients, hematologic malignancies, autoimmune disease, solid tumors, HIV, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, adenovirus vector vaccine
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Humans, Prospective Studies, Vaccination, HIV Infections, Immunocompromised Host

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review