PreprintCited by 0Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benchmarking imputation methods for network inference using a novel method of synthetic scRNA-seq data generation

Open access
Lasri, Ayoub, Shahrezaei, Vahid, Sturrock, Marc·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s12859-022-04778-9 · Paper page

Abstract

Single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has very rapidly become the new workhorse of modern biology providing an unprecedented global view on cellular diversity and heterogeneity. In particular, the structure of gene-gene expression correlation contains information on the underlying gene regulatory networks. However, interpretation of scRNA-seq data is challenging due to specific experimental error and biases that are unique to this kind of data including drop-out (or technical zeros). To deal with this problem several methods for imputation of zeros for scRNA-seq have been developed. However, it is not clear how these processing steps affect inference of genetic networks from single cell data. Here, we introduce Biomodelling.jl, a tool for generation of synthetic scRNA-seq data using multiscale modelling of stochastic gene regulatory networks in growing and dividing cells. Our tool produces realistic transcription data with a known ground truth network topology that can be used to benchmark different approaches for gene regulatory network inference. Using this tool we investigate the impact of different imputation methods on the performance of several network inference algorithms. Biomodelling.jl provides a versatile and useful tool for future development and benchmarking of network inference approaches using scRNA-seq data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.10.13.464275

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. 10.1073/pnas.0502024102 · DOI
  2. 2018, Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 50, 1
  3. 10.1038/s41591-018-0096-5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41586-018-0414-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2019, Nature Microbiology, 4, 480
  6. 2020, eLife, 9, e51254
  7. 2017, SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering, Nature Methods, 14, 1083, 10.1038/nmeth.4463 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2017, Gene Regulatory Network Inference from Single-Cell Data Using Multivariate Information Measures, Cell Systems, 5, 251, 10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2021, A comprehensive survey of regulatory network inference methods using single cell rna sequencing data, Briefings in bioinformatics, 22, bbaa190, 10.1093/bib/bbaa190 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41467-019-13301-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2018, Nature Methods, 15, 539
  13. 2018, Nature Communications, 9, 997
  14. 10.1186/s12859-018-2226-y · DOI
  15. 10.1186/s13059-018-1575-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.061 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2020, bayNorm: Bayesian gene expression recovery, imputation and normalization for single-cell RNA-sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 36, 1174, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz726 · DOI
  18. 2020, Comparison of Computational Methods for Imputing Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data, IEEE/ACM transactions on com-putational biology and bioinformatics, 17, 376, 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2848633 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/s13059-020-02132-x · DOI
  20. 2018, Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics, Nature Methods, 15, 1053, 10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2019, Nature Communications, 10, 390
  22. 10.1099/mic.0.042937-0 · DOI
  23. Lam-Ha Ly and Martin Vingron . Effect of imputation on gene network reconstruction from single-cell rna-seq data. bioRxiv, 2021.
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.032 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.055 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1016 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-1 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.08.009 · DOI
  29. 2009, Reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks: a comparative study, EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, 2009, 1
  30. 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.010 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn126 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp115 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp068 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr373 · DOI
  35. 10.1186/s12859-014-0430-y · DOI
  36. 2012, Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference, Nature methods, 9, 796, 10.1038/nmeth.2016 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013397 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1186/s13059-016-1145-3 · DOI
  39. Viktor Milkevych , Emre Karaman , Goutam Sahana , Luc Janss , Zexi Cai , and Mogens Sandø Lund . Mescot: The tool for quantitative trait simulation through the mechanistic modelling of genes’ regulatory interactions. G3 Genes— Genomes— Genetics, 2021. · DOI
  40. 10.1137/141000671. arXiv:1411.1607v4 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2020, Current Biology, 30, 1217
  42. 2019, Nature Com-munications, 10, 1017
  43. 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.810 · DOI
  44. Wilberforce Zachary Ouma , Katja Pogacar , and Erich Grotewold . Topological and statistical analyses of gene regulatory networks reveal unifying yet quantitatively different emergent properties. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(4), April 2018. · DOI
  45. 2018, PLOS Computational Biology, 14, e1006172
  46. 2010, Sparse Regulatory Networks, The annals of applied statistics, 4, 663
  47. 2013, PLOS Computational Biology, 9, e1003068
  48. 10.1021/j100540a008 · DOI
  49. 10.1063/1.481811 · DOI
  50. 10.1063/1.1378322 · DOI
  51. 10.1091/mbc.E14-08-1296 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41467-020-18952-1 · DOI
  53. 2018, Exponential scaling of single-cell rna-seq in the past decade, Nature protocols, 13, 599, 10.1038/nprot.2017.149 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 1999, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science (New York, N.Y.), 286, 509, 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/nature14562 · DOI
  56. 10.1098/rsos.172234 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/s41467-018-04058-2 · DOI
  58. 2019, In Silico Biology, 13, 21
  59. 2013, Effect of phenotypic selection on stochastic gene expression, The Journal of Physical chemistry B, 117, 13194, 10.1021/jp403231f · DOI
  60. 2000, Simultaneous coagulation and break-up using constant-n monte carlo, Powder Technology, 110, 82
  61. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.005 · DOI
  62. 2019, Intrinsic and extrinsic noise of gene expression in lineage trees, Scientific Reports, 9, 474, 10.1038/s41598-018-35927-x · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 2021, Systematic comparison of high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq methods for immune cell profiling, BMC Genomics, 22, 66, 10.1186/s12864-020-07358-4 · DOI
  65. 2017, Nature Methods, 14, 565
  66. 2021, A review of computational strategies for denoising and imputation of single-cell transcriptomic data, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, bbaa222
  67. Thalia E Chan , Ananth V Pallaseni , Ann C Babtie , Kirsten R McEwen , and Michael PH Stumpf . Empirical bayes meets information theoretical network reconstruction from single cell data. BioRxiv, page 264853, 2018. · DOI
  68. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012776 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Kendrick Boyd , Kevin H. Eng , and C. David Page . Area under the Precision-Recall Curve: Point Estimates and Confidence Intervals. In Hendrik Blockeel , Kristian Kersting , Siegfried Nijssen , and Filip Železný , editors, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 451–466, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. Springer. · DOI
  71. He Haibo . Imbalanced Learning: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications | Wiley.
  72. 2017, Gene regulatory network inference from single-cell data using multivariate information measures, Cell systems, 5, 251, 10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1186/s12864-021-07502-8 · DOI
  74. 2016, Identifying and removing the cell-cycle effect from single-cell rna-sequencing data, Scientific reports, 6, 1
  75. Jiajia Liu , Mengyuan Yang , Weiling Zhao , and Xiaobo Zhou . Ccpe: Cell cycle pseudotime estimation for single cell rna-seq data. bioRxiv, 2021.
  76. 10.1101/gr.247759.118 · DOI
  77. Lam-Ha Ly and Martin Vingron . Effect of imputation on gene network reconstruction from single-cell RNA-seq data. bioRxiv, page 2021.04.13.439623, April 2021. Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Section: New Results.
  78. Lisa Maria Steinheuer , Sebastian Canzler , and Jörg Hackermüller . Bench marking scRNA-seq imputation tools with respect to network inference highlights deficits in performance at high levels of sparsity. bioRxiv, page 2021.04.02.438193, April 2021. Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Section: New Results. · DOI
  79. 10.1038/s41467-020-18952-1 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lasri, A., Shahrezaei, V., & Sturrock, M.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sturrock, Marc
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-10-14
OpenAlex
W3205540525
Cited by
0
References
5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (766069, HORIZON2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, gene regulatory network inference, zero imputation, dropout, synthetic data generation, benchmarking, multiscale modeling, gene expression correlation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review