The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benchmarking imputation methods for network inference using a novel method of synthetic scRNA-seq data generation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1186/s12859-022-04778-9 · Paper page
Abstract
Single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has very rapidly become the new workhorse of modern biology providing an unprecedented global view on cellular diversity and heterogeneity. In particular, the structure of gene-gene expression correlation contains information on the underlying gene regulatory networks. However, interpretation of scRNA-seq data is challenging due to specific experimental error and biases that are unique to this kind of data including drop-out (or technical zeros). To deal with this problem several methods for imputation of zeros for scRNA-seq have been developed. However, it is not clear how these processing steps affect inference of genetic networks from single cell data. Here, we introduce Biomodelling.jl, a tool for generation of synthetic scRNA-seq data using multiscale modelling of stochastic gene regulatory networks in growing and dividing cells. Our tool produces realistic transcription data with a known ground truth network topology that can be used to benchmark different approaches for gene regulatory network inference. Using this tool we investigate the impact of different imputation methods on the performance of several network inference algorithms. Biomodelling.jl provides a versatile and useful tool for future development and benchmarking of network inference approaches using scRNA-seq data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566
Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges
Saliba, A.-E., Westermann, A. J., Gorski, S. A., & Vogel, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku555 · Cited by 847
A systematic evaluation of single cell RNA-seq analysis pipelines
Vieth, B., Parekh, S., Ziegenhain, C., Enard, W., & Hellmann, I. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12266-7 · Cited by 265
Chen, S., & Mar, J. C. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2217-z · Cited by 235
Jackson, C. A., Castro, D. M., Saldi, G.-A., Bonneau, R., & Gresham, D. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.51254 · Cited by 174
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 79
- 10.1073/pnas.0502024102 · DOI
- 2018, Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 50, 1
- 10.1038/s41591-018-0096-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0414-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Nature Microbiology, 4, 480
- 2020, eLife, 9, e51254
- 2017, SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering, Nature Methods, 14, 1083, 10.1038/nmeth.4463 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, Gene Regulatory Network Inference from Single-Cell Data Using Multivariate Information Measures, Cell Systems, 5, 251, 10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, A comprehensive survey of regulatory network inference methods using single cell rna sequencing data, Briefings in bioinformatics, 22, bbaa190, 10.1093/bib/bbaa190 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-13301-3 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Nature Methods, 15, 539
- 2018, Nature Communications, 9, 997
- 10.1186/s12859-018-2226-y · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-018-1575-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.061 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, bayNorm: Bayesian gene expression recovery, imputation and normalization for single-cell RNA-sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 36, 1174, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz726 · DOI
- 2020, Comparison of Computational Methods for Imputing Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data, IEEE/ACM transactions on com-putational biology and bioinformatics, 17, 376, 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2848633 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-020-02132-x · DOI
- 2018, Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics, Nature Methods, 15, 1053, 10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Nature Communications, 10, 390
- 10.1099/mic.0.042937-0 · DOI
- Lam-Ha Ly and Martin Vingron . Effect of imputation on gene network reconstruction from single-cell rna-seq data. bioRxiv, 2021.
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.032 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.055 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1016 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-7-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.08.009 · DOI
- 2009, Reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks: a comparative study, EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, 2009, 1
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn126 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp115 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp068 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr373 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-014-0430-y · DOI
- 2012, Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference, Nature methods, 9, 796, 10.1038/nmeth.2016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0013397 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13059-016-1145-3 · DOI
- Viktor Milkevych , Emre Karaman , Goutam Sahana , Luc Janss , Zexi Cai , and Mogens Sandø Lund . Mescot: The tool for quantitative trait simulation through the mechanistic modelling of genes’ regulatory interactions. G3 Genes— Genomes— Genetics, 2021. · DOI
- 10.1137/141000671. arXiv:1411.1607v4 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Current Biology, 30, 1217
- 2019, Nature Com-munications, 10, 1017
- 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.810 · DOI
- Wilberforce Zachary Ouma , Katja Pogacar , and Erich Grotewold . Topological and statistical analyses of gene regulatory networks reveal unifying yet quantitatively different emergent properties. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(4), April 2018. · DOI
- 2018, PLOS Computational Biology, 14, e1006172
- 2010, Sparse Regulatory Networks, The annals of applied statistics, 4, 663
- 2013, PLOS Computational Biology, 9, e1003068
- 10.1021/j100540a008 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.481811 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1378322 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E14-08-1296 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-18952-1 · DOI
- 2018, Exponential scaling of single-cell rna-seq in the past decade, Nature protocols, 13, 599, 10.1038/nprot.2017.149 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science (New York, N.Y.), 286, 509, 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature14562 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsos.172234 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04058-2 · DOI
- 2019, In Silico Biology, 13, 21
- 2013, Effect of phenotypic selection on stochastic gene expression, The Journal of Physical chemistry B, 117, 13194, 10.1021/jp403231f · DOI
- 2000, Simultaneous coagulation and break-up using constant-n monte carlo, Powder Technology, 110, 82
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.005 · DOI
- 2019, Intrinsic and extrinsic noise of gene expression in lineage trees, Scientific Reports, 9, 474, 10.1038/s41598-018-35927-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Systematic comparison of high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq methods for immune cell profiling, BMC Genomics, 22, 66, 10.1186/s12864-020-07358-4 · DOI
- 2017, Nature Methods, 14, 565
- 2021, A review of computational strategies for denoising and imputation of single-cell transcriptomic data, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, bbaa222
- Thalia E Chan , Ananth V Pallaseni , Ann C Babtie , Kirsten R McEwen , and Michael PH Stumpf . Empirical bayes meets information theoretical network reconstruction from single cell data. BioRxiv, page 264853, 2018. · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0012776 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · DOI · Paper page
- Kendrick Boyd , Kevin H. Eng , and C. David Page . Area under the Precision-Recall Curve: Point Estimates and Confidence Intervals. In Hendrik Blockeel , Kristian Kersting , Siegfried Nijssen , and Filip Železný , editors, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 451–466, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. Springer. · DOI
- He Haibo . Imbalanced Learning: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications | Wiley.
- 2017, Gene regulatory network inference from single-cell data using multivariate information measures, Cell systems, 5, 251, 10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12864-021-07502-8 · DOI
- 2016, Identifying and removing the cell-cycle effect from single-cell rna-sequencing data, Scientific reports, 6, 1
- Jiajia Liu , Mengyuan Yang , Weiling Zhao , and Xiaobo Zhou . Ccpe: Cell cycle pseudotime estimation for single cell rna-seq data. bioRxiv, 2021.
- 10.1101/gr.247759.118 · DOI
- Lam-Ha Ly and Martin Vingron . Effect of imputation on gene network reconstruction from single-cell RNA-seq data. bioRxiv, page 2021.04.13.439623, April 2021. Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Section: New Results.
- Lisa Maria Steinheuer , Sebastian Canzler , and Jörg Hackermüller . Bench marking scRNA-seq imputation tools with respect to network inference highlights deficits in performance at high levels of sparsity. bioRxiv, page 2021.04.02.438193, April 2021. Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Section: New Results. · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-18952-1 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasri, A., Shahrezaei, V., & Sturrock, M.
- Affiliations
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sturrock, Marc
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-10-14
- OpenAlex
- W3205540525
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (766069, HORIZON2020)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- single-cell RNA sequencing, gene regulatory network inference, zero imputation, dropout, synthetic data generation, benchmarking, multiscale modeling, gene expression correlation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review