The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of residue inversions in large phylogenies of duplicated proteins
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010016
Abstract
Connecting protein sequence to function is becoming increasingly relevant since high-throughput sequencing studies accumulate large amounts of genomic data. In order to go beyond the existing database annotation, it is fundamental to understand the mechanisms underlying functional inheritance and divergence. If the homology relationship between proteins is known, can we determine whether the function diverged? In this work, we analyze different possibilities of protein sequence evolution after gene duplication and identify “residue inversions”, i.e., sites where the relationship between the ancestry and the functional signal is decoupled. Residues in these sites are masked from being recognized by other prediction tools. Still, they play a role in functional divergence and could indicate a shift in protein function. We develop a method to specifically recognize residue inversions in a phylogeny and test it on real and simulated datasets. In a dataset built from the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) sequences found in 88 fish species, we identify 19 positions that went through inversion after gene duplication, mostly located at the ligand-binding extracellular domain. Our work uncovers a rare event of protein divergence that has direct implications in protein functional annotation and sequence evolution as a whole. The developed method is optimized to work with large protein datasets and can be readily included in a targeted protein analysis pipeline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkp339 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1266/jjg.66.367 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004421 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm2281 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.41.4.215 · DOI
- 2020, Determining the interaction status and evolutionary fate of duplicated homomeric proteins, PLoS Comput Biol, 16, e1008145, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008145 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msv095 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbr022 · DOI
- 2003, Evolution by gene duplication: an update, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 292, 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00033-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrg2689 · DOI
- 2002, Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate gene retention, Development, 129, 2339, 10.1242/dev.129.10.2339 · DOI
- 2014, A survey on prediction of specificity-determining sites in proteins, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 16, 71
- 10.1038/nsb0295-171 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0167 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.03465504 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00587-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm626 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4036 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.03191704 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r232 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq552 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20550 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/mst069 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn214 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.055 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003929 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.92 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-3-14 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.1224503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gks559 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.278.5338.631 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090439 · DOI
- 10.1038/msb4100025 · DOI
- 2003, Distribution and function of EGFR in human tissue and the effect of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition, Anticancer Res, 23, 3639
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.010 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.1717804 · DOI
- 10.1002/bies.20293 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/g3.118.200201 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2148-10-16 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0707158104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkq967 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2013.2881 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-13-96 · DOI
- 1993, The functional importance of hydrophobicity of the tyrosine at position 13 of human epidermal growth factor in receptor binding, The Journal of biological chemistry, 268, 10114, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82179-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msh017 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00963-7 · DOI
- 2020, Logomaker: beautiful sequence logos in Python, Bioinformatics, 36, 2272, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz921 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti720 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003824 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12091 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msn067 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkl200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0139047 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · DOI
- 1995, A space-time process model for the evolution of DNA sequences, Genetics, 139, 993, 10.1093/genetics/139.2.993 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/mss140 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Pascarelli, S., & Laurino, P.
- Affiliations
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Laurino, Paola
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-11-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1010016-e1010016
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9009777
- OpenAlex
- W4223924163
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- gene duplication, functional divergence, protein sequence evolution, protein annotation, phylogenetic analysis, epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, fish, protein function prediction
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Animals, Chromosome Inversion, Phylogeny, Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review