PreprintCited by 3Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of residue inversions in large phylogenies of duplicated proteins

Open access
Pascarelli, Stefano, Laurino, Paola·2021·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010016

Abstract

Connecting protein sequence to function is becoming increasingly relevant since high-throughput sequencing studies accumulate large amounts of genomic data. In order to go beyond the existing database annotation, it is fundamental to understand the mechanisms underlying functional inheritance and divergence. If the homology relationship between proteins is known, can we determine whether the function diverged? In this work, we analyze different possibilities of protein sequence evolution after gene duplication and identify “residue inversions”, i.e., sites where the relationship between the ancestry and the functional signal is decoupled. Residues in these sites are masked from being recognized by other prediction tools. Still, they play a role in functional divergence and could indicate a shift in protein function. We develop a method to specifically recognize residue inversions in a phylogeny and test it on real and simulated datasets. In a dataset built from the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) sequences found in 88 fish species, we identify 19 positions that went through inversion after gene duplication, mostly located at the ligand-binding extracellular domain. Our work uncovers a rare event of protein divergence that has direct implications in protein functional annotation and sequence evolution as a whole. The developed method is optimized to work with large protein datasets and can be readily included in a targeted protein analysis pipeline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.04.467263

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/nar/gkp339 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.05.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1266/jjg.66.367 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004421 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nrm2281 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.41.4.215 · DOI
  8. 2020, Determining the interaction status and evolutionary fate of duplicated homomeric proteins, PLoS Comput Biol, 16, e1008145, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008145 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/molbev/msv095 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/bib/bbr022 · DOI
  11. 2003, Evolution by gene duplication: an update, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 292, 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00033-8 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nrg2689 · DOI
  13. 2002, Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate gene retention, Development, 129, 2339, 10.1242/dev.129.10.2339 · DOI
  14. 2014, A survey on prediction of specificity-determining sites in proteins, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 16, 71
  15. 10.1038/nsb0295-171 · DOI
  16. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0167 · DOI
  17. 10.1110/ps.03465504 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00587-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm626 · DOI
  20. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4036 · DOI
  21. 10.1110/ps.03191704 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r232 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq552 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/prot.20550 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/molbev/mst069 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn214 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.055 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003929 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.92 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/1471-2105-3-14 · DOI
  31. 10.1101/gr.1224503 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1093/nar/gks559 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.278.5338.631 · DOI
  34. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090439 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/msb4100025 · DOI
  36. 2003, Distribution and function of EGFR in human tissue and the effect of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition, Anticancer Res, 23, 3639
  37. 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.010 · DOI
  38. 10.1101/gr.1717804 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/bies.20293 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1534/g3.118.200201 · DOI
  41. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-16 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0707158104 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/nar/gkq967 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1098/rspb.2013.2881 · DOI
  45. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-96 · DOI
  46. 1993, The functional importance of hydrophobicity of the tyrosine at position 13 of human epidermal growth factor in receptor binding, The Journal of biological chemistry, 268, 10114, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82179-2 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/molbev/msh017 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00963-7 · DOI
  49. 2020, Logomaker: beautiful sequence logos in Python, Bioinformatics, 36, 2272, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz921 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti720 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003824 · DOI
  52. 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12091 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/molbev/msn067 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/nar/gkx1098 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1093/nar/gkl200 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
  64. 10.1371/journal.pone.0139047 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · DOI
  66. 1995, A space-time process model for the evolution of DNA sequences, Genetics, 139, 993, 10.1093/genetics/139.2.993 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/molbev/mss140 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · DOI
  69. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Pascarelli, S., & Laurino, P.
Affiliations
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
Corresponding author
Laurino, Paola
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-04
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
e1010016-e1010016
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223924163
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
gene duplication, functional divergence, protein sequence evolution, protein annotation, phylogenetic analysis, epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, fish, protein function prediction
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Animals, Chromosome Inversion, Phylogeny, Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review