Cited by 405Evolution and Genetic DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsPhilosophy and History of Science

Ohno's dilemma: Evolution of new genes under continuous selection

Open access
Bergthorsson, Ulfar, Andersson, Dan I., Roth, John R.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

New genes with novel functions arise by duplication and divergence, but the process poses a problem. After duplication, an extra gene copy must rise to sufficiently high frequency in the population and remain free of common inactivating lesions long enough to acquire the rare mutations that provide a new selectable function. Maintaining a duplicated gene by selection for the original function would restrict the freedom to diverge. (We refer to this problem as Ohno's dilemma). A model is described by which selection continuously favors both maintenance of the duplicate copy and divergence of that copy from the parent gene. Before duplication, the original gene has a trace side activity (the innovation) in addition to its original function. When an altered ecological niche makes the minor innovation valuable, selection favors increases in its level (the amplification), which is most frequently conferred by increased dosage of the parent gene. Selection for the amplified minor function maintains the extra copies and raises the frequency of the amplification in the population. The same selection favors mutational improvement of any of the extra copies, which are not constrained to maintain their original function (the divergence). The rate of mutations (per genome) that improve the new function is increased by the multiplicity of target copies within a genome. Improvement of some copies relaxes selection on others and allows their loss by mutation (becoming pseudogenes). Ultimately one of the extra copies is able to provide all of the new activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0707158104

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Duplications and large scale genomic variations, although they can lead to significant issues such as genomic instability, play a major role in yeast evolution.

    “As such, ALE studies highlight that duplications and large scale genomic variations, although they can lead to significant issues such as genomic instability [152], play a major role in e.g. yeast evolution; this is also indicated by data on wine yeasts, galactose utilization, comparative genomics and drug resistance [115,153-156].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schimke RT (1982) Gene Amplification (Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY).
  2. Patrick WM, Quandt EM, Swartzlander DB, Matsumura I (September 19, 2007) Mol Biol Evol, 10.1093/molbev/mxm204. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergthorsson, U., Andersson, D. I., & Roth, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-10-23
Volume
104
Issue
43
Pages
17004-17009
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2051768616
Cited by
405
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM27068, R01GM027068)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20-RR18754, P20RR018754)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
gene duplication, gene divergence, continuous selections, pseudogenes, gene copy number
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Gene Amplification, Gene Frequency, Models, Genetic, Recombination, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Point Mutation, Gene Duplication, Gene Transfer, Horizontal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review