PreprintCited by 2SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

RASCL: Rapid Assessment Of SARS-CoV-2 Clades Through Molecular Sequence Analysis

Open access
Lucaci, Alexander G, Zehr, Jordan D, Shank, Stephen D, Bouvier, Dave, Mei, Han, Nekrutenko, Anton, Martin, Darren P, Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L·2022·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

An important component of efforts to manage the ongoing COVID19 pandemic is the R apid A ssessment of how natural selection contributes to the emergence and proliferation of potentially dangerous S ARS-CoV-2 lineages and CL ades (RASCL). The RASCL pipeline enables continuous comparative phylogenetics-based selection analyses of rapidly growing clade-focused genome surveillance datasets, such as those produced following the initial detection of potentially dangerous variants. From such datasets RASCL automatically generates down-sampled codon alignments of individual genes/ORFs containing contextualizing background reference sequences, analyzes these with a battery of selection tests, and outputs results as both machine readable JSON files, and interactive notebook-based visualizations. Availability: RASCL is available from a dedicated repository at https://github.com/veg/RASCL and as a Galaxy workflow https://usegalaxy.eu/u/hyphy/w/rascl . Existing clade/variant analysis results are available here: https://observablehq.com/@aglucaci/rascl . Contact: Dr. Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond ( spond@temple.edu ). Supplementary information: N/A

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.01.15.476448

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the RASCL pipeline, no compelling evidence was found of imbalances between ratios of synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions indicative of positive or negative selection acting on any of the genes of viruses in either the BA.4 or BA.5 lineages.

    “Using the RASCL pipeline7 (which employs a battery of tests that analyze ratios of synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions both at individual codon sites and entire protein-coding regions), we found no compelling evidence of imbalances between ratios of synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions such as would be indicative of positive”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Tegally H, Wilkinson E, Giovanetti M, Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa. Nature. 2021 Apr; 592(7854): 438– 443. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9. 33690265 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [31]Faria Nuno R., Mellan Thomas A., Whittaker Charles, Claro Ingra M., da S. Candido Darlan, Mishra Swapnil, Crispim Myuki A. E., “ Genomics and Epidemiology of the P.1 SARS-CoV-2 Lineage in Manaus, Brazil.” Science 372, no. 6544 (May 21, 2021): 815– 21. 10.1126/science.abh2644. 33853970 PMC8139423 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucaci, A. G., Zehr, J. D., Shank, S. D., Bouvier, D., Mei, H., Nekrutenko, A., Martin, D. P., & Kosakovsky Pond, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-01-18
OpenAlex
W4205672035
Cited by
2
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2027196)
  • Wellcome Trust (222574, 222574/Z/21/Z)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI134384, R01AI134384)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, viral clades, natural selection, phylogenetic comparative analysis, genomic surveillance, variant emergence, codon alignment, selection tests, Galaxy workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review