The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Newly Born Orphan Proteins Resemble Never Born Proteins? A Study Using Three Deep Learning Algorithms
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26496 · Paper page
Abstract
‘Newly Born’ proteins, devoid of detectable homology to any other proteins, known as orphan proteins, occur in a single species or within a taxonomically restricted gene family. They are generated by expression of novel Open Reading Frames, and appear throughout evolution. We were curious if the three recently developed programs for predicting protein structures, viz., AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, and ESMFold, might be of value for comparison of such ‘ Newly Born’ proteins to random polypeptides with amino acid content similar to that of native proteins, which have been called ‘ Never Born ’ proteins. The programs were used to compare the structures of two sets of ‘ Never Born’ proteins that had been expressed – Group 1, which had been shown experimentally to possess substantial secondary structure, and Group 3, which had been shown to be intrinsically disordered. Overall, the models generated were scored as being of low quality but revealed some general principles. Specifically, all four members of Group 1 were predicted to be compact by all three algorithms. The members of Group 3 were predicted to be very extended, as would be expected for intrinsically disordered proteins. The three programs were then used to predict the structures of three orphan proteins whose crystal structures had been solved, two of which display novel folds. Finally, they were used to predict the structures of seven orphan proteins with well-identified biological functions, whose 3D structures are not known. Two proteins, which were predicted to be disordered based on their sequences, are predicted by all three structure algorithms to be extended structures. The other five were predicted to be compact structures with two exceptions in the case of AlphaFold2. All three prediction algorithms make remarkably similar and high-quality predictions for one large protein, HCO_11565, from a nematode. It is conjectured that this is due to many homologs in the taxonomically restricted family of which it is a member and to the fact that the Dali server revealed several non-related proteins with similar folds. Overall, orphan and taxonomically restricted proteins are often predicted to have compact 3D structures, sometimes with a novel fold that is a consequence of their novel sequences, which are associated with the appearance of new biological functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- 10.1002/prot.10559 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp660 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0036634 · DOI
- 2022, DistilProtBert: a distilled protein language model used to distinguish between real proteins and their randomly shuffled counterparts, Bioinformatics, 38, ii95, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac474 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, Investigation of de novo totally random biosequences, Part I: A general method for in vitro selection of folded domains from a random polypeptide library displayed on phage, Chem Biodivers, 3, 827
- 2006, Investigation of de novo totally random biosequences, Part II: On the folding frequency in a totally random library of de novo proteins obtained by phage display, Chem Biodivers, 3, 840, 10.1002/cbdv.200690088 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-15635-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb1095-856 · DOI
- 10.1038/35070613 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.04690804 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, De novo protein design by deep network hallucination, Nature, 600, 547, 10.1038/s41586-021-04184-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrg3053 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature11184 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003860 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2014.0332 · DOI
- 2017, Fact or fiction: updates on how protein-coding genes might emerge de novo from previously non-coding DNA, F1000Res, 6, 57, 10.12688/f1000research.10079.1 · DOI
- Vakirlis N , Carvunis AR , McLysaght A. Synteny-based analyses indicate that sequence divergence is not the main source of orphan genes. eLife. 2020;9. · DOI
- 2022, Foster thy young: enhanced prediction of orphan genes in assembled genomes, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, e37, 10.1093/nar/gkab1238 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.860134 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biochi.2011.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2009.07.006 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.095026.109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.098376.109 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msn281 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002379 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002942 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evaa194 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.03523 · DOI
- Lin Z , Akin H , Rao R , et al. Language models of protein sequences at the scale of evolution enable accurate structure prediction. bioRxiv. 2022:2022.2007.2020.500902.
- 10.1107/S0907444998009378 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV, Proteins, 89, 1607, 10.1002/prot.26237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Structure and mechanism of copper-carbonic anhydrase II: a nitrite reductase, IUCrJ, 7, 287
- 10.1002/prot.10471 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.10018 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi400502c · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.20138 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20148 · DOI
- 2012, Structural View of a Non Pfam Singleton and Crystal Packing Analysis, PLoS One, 7, e31673, 10.1371/journal.pone.0031673 · DOI
- 2022, Thermal proteome profiling reveals Haemonchus orphan protein HCO_011565 as a target of the nematocidal small molecule UMW-868, Front Pharmacol, 13, 1014804, 10.3389/fphar.2022.1014804 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0056162 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000734 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003996 · DOI
- Xie C , Bekpen C , Kunzel S , et al. A de novo evolved gene in the house mouse regulates female pregnancy cycles. eLife. 2019;8. · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.15.01056 · DOI
- 2018, Novel erythrocyte clumps revealed by an orphan gene Newtic1 in circulating blood and regenerating limbs of the adult newt, Sci Rep, 8, 7455, 10.1038/s41598-018-25867-x · DOI
- 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Improved protein structure refinement guided by deep learning based accuracy estimation, Nat Commun, 12, 1340, 10.1038/s41467-021-21511-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/26.1.316 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3749 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti537 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-24773-7 · DOI
- Uversky VN. Intrinsically disordered proteins and their “mysterious” (meta)physics. Frontiers Phys. 2019;7. · DOI
- 2000, Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes, Genome Informatics, 11, 161
- 10.1021/bi047993o · DOI
- 2022, Prediction of intrinsic disorder using Rosetta ResidueDisorder and AlphaFold2, J Chem Phys B, 126, 8439, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05508 · DOI
- Alderson T , Pritisanac I , Moses A , Forman-Kay J. Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2. bioRxiv. 2022:2022.2002.2018.481080. · DOI
- 2022, De novo birth of functional microproteins in the human lineage, Cell Rep, 41, 111808, 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111808 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
- 2021, Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction, Nat Methods, 18, 472, 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Folding the unfoldable: using AlphaFold to explore spurious proteins, Bioinformatics Advances, 2, vbab043, 10.1093/bioadv/vbab043 · DOI
- 10.1093/database/bas003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00337-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.10011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0134(20001115)41:3<415::AID-PROT130>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb0696-488 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-3233(00)53005-8 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00163a039 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01362-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2419 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Single-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning, Nat Biotechnol, 40, 1617, 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Yuan, R., Shao, W., Wang, J., Silman, I., & Sussman, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Silman, Israel
- Sussman, Joel L.
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-08-02
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1097-1115
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4366819635
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- orphan proteins, protein structure prediction, AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, ESMFold, intrinsically disordered proteins, novel protein fold, solvent accessible surface area, protein compactness
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review