PreprintCited by 35Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-023-04773-7 · Paper page

Abstract

A major goal in structural biology is to understand protein assemblies in their biologically relevant states. Here, we investigate whether AlphaFold2 structure predictions match native protein conformations. We chemically cross-linked proteins in situ within intact Tetrahymena thermophila cilia and native ciliary extracts and identified 1,225 intramolecular cross-links within the 100 best-sampled proteins to provide a benchmark of distance restraints obeyed by proteins in their native assemblies. The corresponding AlphaFold2 structure predictions were highly concordant, positioning 86.2% of cross-linked residues within Cα-to-Cα distances of 30 Å, consistent with the known cross-linker length. 43% of the proteins showed no violations. Most inconsistencies occurred in low-confidence regions or between domains of the structure prediction. For basal body protein BBC118, cross-links combined with the predicted structure revealed domain packing satisfying both data. Overall, AlphaFold2 predicted biological structures with low predicted aligned error corresponded to more correct native structures. However, we observe cases where rigid body domains are oriented incorrectly, suggesting that combining structure prediction with experimental information will better reveal biologically relevant conformations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.25.505345

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 2021, High-accuracy protein structure prediction in CASP14, Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma, 89, 1687, 10.1002/prot.26171 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Terwilliger TC , Poon BK , Afonine PV , Schlicksup CJ , Croll TI , Millán C , et al. Improved AlphaFold modeling with implicit experimental information [Internet]. Biochemistry; 2022 Jan [cited 2022 May 6]. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.01.07.475350 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2022, The impact of AlphaFold2 one year on, Nat Methods, 19, 15, 10.1038/s41592-021-01365-3 · DOI
  4. 2022, Cryo-EM and artificial intelligence visualize endogenous protein community members, Structure, 30, 575, 10.1016/j.str.2022.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2022, 8 Å structure of the outer rings of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex obtained by cryo-EM and AI, Protein Cell, 13, 760, 10.1007/s13238-021-00895-y · DOI
  6. Chang L , Wang F , Connolly K , Meng H , Su Z , Cvirkaite-Krupovic V , et al. DeepTracer ID: De Novo Protein Identification from Cryo-EM Maps [Internet]. Biophysics; 2022 Jun [cited 2022 Jul 12]. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.06.03.494766 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Akdel M , Pires DEV , Porta Pardo E , Jänes J , Zalevsky AO , Mészáros B , et al. A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold 2 applications [Internet]. Biophysics; 2021 Sep [cited 2022 May 6]. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.09.26.461876 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bordin N , Sillitoe I , Nallapareddy V , Rauer C , Lam SD , Waman VP , et al. AlphaFold2 reveals commonalities and novelties in protein structure space for 21 model organisms [Internet]. Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun [cited 2022 Aug 1]. Available from:http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.06.02.494367 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/nar/gkw1099 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1508380112 · DOI
  12. 2022, The structural coverage of the human proteome before and after AlphaFold, PLoS Comput Biol, 18, e1009818, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009818 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/nar/gkz972 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , Antropova N , Senior A , Green T , et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer [Internet]. Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct [cited 2022 May 6].Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2022, AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning, Nat Commun, 13, 1744, 10.1038/s41467-022-29394-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2022, Author Correction: Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2, Nat Commun, 13, 1694, 10.1038/s41467-022-29480-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ko J , Lee J. Can AlphaFold2 predict protein-peptide complex structures accurately? [Internet]. Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul [cited 2022 Jul 12]. Available from:http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.07.27.453972 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nrd892 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2021, AlphaFold heralds a data-driven revolution in biology and medicine, Nat Med, 27, 1666, 10.1038/s41591-021-01533-0 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Fowler NJ , Williamson MP. The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR [Internet]. Biophysics; 2022 Jan [cited 2022 May 6]. Available from:http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.01.18.476751 · DOI
  23. McCafferty CL , Papoulas O , Jordan MA , Hoogerbrugge G , Nichols C , Pigino G , et al. Integrative modeling reveals the molecular architecture of the Intraflagellar Transport A (IFT-A) complex [Internet]. Biochemistry; 2022 Jul [cited 2022 Jul 9]. Available from:http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.07.05.498886 · DOI
  24. O’Reilly FJ , Graziadei A , Forbrig C , Bremenkamp R , Charles K , Lenz S , et al. Protein complexes in Bacillus subtilis by AI-assisted structural proteomics [Internet]. Molecular Biology; 2022 Jul [cited 2022 Aug 1]. Available from:http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.07.26.501605 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2021, AlphaFold Protein Structure Database for Sequence-Independent Molecular Replacement, Crystals, 11, 1227, 10.3390/cryst11101227 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Wang Y , Sušac L , Feigon J. Structural Biology of Telomerase. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019 Dec 2;11(12):a032383. · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nrm.2017.60 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028290 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90657-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/nbt.2419 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Gaertig J , Wloga D , Vasudevan KK , Guha M , Dentler W. Discovery and Functional Evaluation of Ciliary Proteins in Tetrahymena thermophila. In: Methods in Enzymology [Internet]. Elsevier; 2013 [cited 2022 Jan 10]. p. 265–84. Available from:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780123979445000134 · DOI
  34. 10.15252/embr.202152911 · DOI
  35. 2020, In situ structure determination at nanometer resolution using TYGRESS, Nat Methods, 17, 201, 10.1038/s41592-019-0651-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167336 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2018, Integrative structure modeling with the integrative modeling platform, Protein Sci, 27, 245, 10.1002/pro.3311 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nature03871 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nsb923 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601677 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2013, Development and evaluation of an entirely solution-based combinative sample preparation method for membrane proteomics, Anal Biochem, 432, 41, 10.1016/j.ab.2012.09.023 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.011 · DOI
  44. 2020, A Pan-plant Protein Complex Map Reveals Deep Conservation and Novel Assemblies, Cell, 181, 460, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.049 · DOI
  45. Graham M , Combe C , Kolbowski L , Rappsilber J. xiView: A common platform for the downstream analysis of Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry data [Internet]. Molecular Biology; 2019 Feb [cited 2022 Jan 10]. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/561829 · DOI
  46. Stanzione D , West J , Evans RT , Minyard T , Ghattas O , Panda DK. Frontera: The Evolution of Leadership Computing at the National Science Foundation. In: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing [Internet]. Portland OR USA: ACM; 2020 [cited 2022 Jun 7]. p. 106–11. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3311790.3396656 · DOI
  47. 10.7717/peerj.453 · DOI
  48. 2017, Using the PRIDE Database and ProteomeXchange for Submitting and Accessing Public Proteomics Datasets, Curr Protoc Bioinforma, 59, 13.31.1

Metadata

Authors
McCafferty, C. L., Pennington, E. L., Papoulas, O., Taylor, D. W., & Marcotte, E. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
McCafferty, Caitlyn L.
Venue
Communications Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-26
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
421-421
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365816022
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2019238253, F-1515, RR160088, F-1938)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R35GM122480, R35GM138348, HD085901)
  • Welch Foundation (F-1515, F-1938)
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (F-1938, F-1515, RR160088)
  • University of Texas at Austin (RR160088, 2019238253, R35GM138348, HD085901)
  • DeepMind
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM138348, R35GM122480)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD085901)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD085901, R01HD085901)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, ciliary proteins, Tetrahymena thermophila, cilia, crosslinking, cross-linking mass spectrometry, distance restraints
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review