PreprintCited by 1SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections Studiesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Encoding Secreted Non-Stabilized Spike Protein in Mice

Open access
Prompetchara, Eakachai, Ketloy, Chutitorn, Alameh, Mohamad-Gabriel, Tarakhet, Kittipan, Kaewpang, Papatsara, Yostrerat, Nongnaphat, Pitakpolrat, Patrawadee, Buranapraditkun, Supranee +13 more·2022·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Establishment of an mRNA vaccine platform in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is important to enhance vaccine accessibility and ensure future pandemic preparedness. Here, we describe the preclinical studies of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA encoding prefusion-unstabilized ectodomain spike protein encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNP) “ChulaCov19”. In BALB/c mice, ChulaCov19 at 0.2, 1, 10, and 30 μg given 2 doses, 21 days apart, elicited robust neutralizing antibody (NAb) and T cells responses in a dose-dependent relationship. The geometric mean titer (GMT) of micro-virus neutralizing (micro-VNT) antibody against wild-type virus was 1,280, 11,762, 54,047, and 62,084, respectively. Higher doses induced better cross-neutralizing antibody against Delta and Omicron variants. This elicited specific immunogenicity was significantly higher than those induced by homologous prime-boost with inactivated (CoronaVac) or viral vector (AZD1222) vaccine. In heterologous prime-boost study, mice primed with either CoronaVac or AZD1222 vaccine and boosted with 5 μg ChulaCov19 generated NAb 7-fold higher against wild-type virus (WT) and was also significantly higher against Omicron (BA.1 and BA.4/5) than homologous CoronaVac or AZD1222 vaccination. AZD1222-prime/mRNA-boost had mean spike-specific IFNγ positive T cells of 3,725 SFC/10 6 splenocytes, which was significantly higher than all groups except homologous ChulaCov19. Challenge study in human-ACE-2-expressing transgenic mice showed that ChulaCov19 at 1 μg or 10 μg protected mice from COVID-19 symptoms, prevented SARS-CoV-2 viremia, significantly reduced tissue viral load in nasal turbinate, brain, and lung tissues 99.9-100%, and without anamnestic of Ab response which indicated its protective efficacy. ChulaCov19 is therefore a promising mRNA vaccine candidate either as a primary or a boost vaccination and has entered clinical development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.09.07.506878

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodent and macaques, ChulaCov19 elicited strong B- and T-cell responses.

    “In rodent and macaques, ChulaCov19 elicited strong B-and T-cell responses 3 .”

    From Safety and immunogenicity of a prefusion non-stabilized spike protein mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a phase I trial (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports robust neutralizing-antibody and T-cell responses to ChulaCov19 in BALB/c mice, supporting the rodent portion of the claim. The cited paper does not report ChulaCov19 B- or T-cell responses in macaques; a search for macaques returned only mouse experiments and unrelated references to monkey-derived cells. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Walsh EE, Frenck RW, Jr., Falsey AR, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2439-50.
  2. Cohen J. New crop of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could be easier to store, cheaper to use: Science 2022 [updated 5 April 2022; cited 2022 30 August]. Available from: https://www.science.org/content/article/new-crop-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-could-be- easier-store-cheaper-use.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prompetchara, E., Ketloy, C., Alameh, M.-G., Tarakhet, K., Kaewpang, P., Yostrerat, N., Pitakpolrat, P., Buranapraditkun, S., Manopwisedcharoen, S., Thitithanyanont, A., Jongkaewwattana, A., Hunsawong, T., Im-Erbsin, R., Reed, M., Wijagkanalan, W., Patarakul, K., Palaga, T., Lam, K., Heyes, J., Weissman, D., & Ruxrungtham, K.
Affiliations
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Mahidol University (TH)
  • National Science and Technology Development Agency (TH)
  • Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (TH)
  • Biotronik (Singapore) (SG)
Corresponding author
Ketloy, Chutitorn
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-09-07
OpenAlex
W4295012182
Cited by
1
References
41
Citations by year
2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Chulalongkorn University (764002-HE04)
  • National Research Council of Thailand
  • Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticles, neutralizing antibodies, T cell response, Omicron variant, Delta variant, heterologous prime-boost, inactivated vaccine, AZD1222, vaccine access, low- and middle-income countries, challenge protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review