Cited by 569RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

A facile method for the removal of dsRNA contaminant from in vitro-transcribed mRNA

Open access
Baiersdörfer, Markus, Boros, Gábor, Muramatsu, Hiromi, Mahiny, Azita, Vlatkovic, Irena, Sahin, Ugur, Karikó, Katalin·2019·Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids

Abstract

The increasing importance of in vitro-transcribed (IVT) mRNA for synthesizing the encoded therapeutic protein in vivo demands the manufacturing of pure mRNA products. The major contaminant in the IVT mRNA is double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), a transcriptional by-product that can be removed only by burdensome procedure requiring special instrumentation and generating hazardous waste. Here we present an alternative simple, fast, and cost-effective method involving only standard laboratory techniques. The purification of IVT mRNA is based on the selective binding of dsRNA to cellulose in an ethanol-containing buffer. We demonstrate that at least 90% of the dsRNA contaminants can be removed with a good, >65% recovery rate, regardless of the length, coding sequence, and nucleoside composition of the IVT mRNA. The procedure is scalable; purification of microgram or milligram amounts of IVT mRNA is achievable. Evaluating the impact of the mRNA purification in vivo in mice, increased translation could be measured for the administered transcripts, including the 1-methylpseudouridine-containing IVT mRNA, which no longer induced interferon (IFN)-α. The cellulose-based removal of dsRNA contaminants is an effective, reliable, and safe method to obtain highly pure IVT mRNA suitable for in vivo applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.02.018

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • dsRNA removal through HPLC or cellulose methods drastically enhances the translational efficiency of IVT mRNAs.

    “It has been shown that dsRNA removal through HPLC or cellulose methods drastically enhances the translational efficiency of IVT mRNAs.13,14”

    From Combining an optimized mRNA template with a double purification process allows strong expression of in vitro transcribed mRNA (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results section (“Cellulose-Purified IVT mRNA Translates Better In Vivo”; page unavailable) reports substantially higher protein levels after purification of U-containing mRNA and says cellulose and HPLC similarly increase its translational capacity. But for m1Ψ-containing mRNA, the increase after either method was minor and not statistically significant. The unqualified claim that purification drastically enhances translation of IVT mRNAs overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • dsRNA depletion leads to a decrease of type I IFN and a translational enhancement of the mRNA into transfected DC cells.

    “This dsRNA depletion leads to a decrease of type I IFN and a translational enhancement of the mRNA into transfected DC cells.”

    From Combining an optimized mRNA template with a double purification process allows strong expression of in vitro transcribed mRNA (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results section reports that removing dsRNA by HPLC had been shown to eliminate IFN-α secretion by transfected dendritic cells. It also reports enhanced translation after purification, but that experiment measured protein production in mice, not in transfected dendritic cells. The paper further limits the IFN finding: cellulose-purified m1Ψ-containing mRNA no longer induced IFN-α, whereas U-containing mRNA still did. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • dsRNA contaminants can be purified by high-performance liquid chromatography or cellulose chromatography.

    “dsRNA contaminants can be purified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or cellulose chromatography13,14”
  • Purification of IVT mRNA using cellulose, HPLC, FPLC, oligo(dT) purification, or TFF can further improve mRNA quality.

    “Further improvement of mRNA quality can be made with purification of IVT mRNA using cellulose,39 high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC),40 fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC),41 oligo(dT) purification,3 or tangential flow filtration (TFF).42,43”

    From COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments (2022) · cites this paper as [39]

  • Removing double-stranded RNA contaminants further ablates in vitro transcribed RNA's immunostimulatory activity.

    “Additional efforts to remove double-stranded (ds)RNA contaminants even further ablated IVT RNA's immunostimulatory activity [8,9]”

    From The dawn of mRNA vaccines: the COVID-19 case (2021) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baiersdörfer, M., Boros, G., Muramatsu, H., Mahiny, A., Vlatkovic, I., Sahin, U., & Karikó, K.
Affiliations
BioNTech (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Baiersdörfer, Markus
Venue
Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
15
Pages
26-35
ISSN
2162-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915388137
Cited by
569
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 3
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
BioNTech RNA Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
in vitro transcribed mRNA, mRNA purification, interferon-alpha induction, in vivo gene delivery, mRNA translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review