PreprintCited by 29Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structures of the Ndc80 complex and its interactions at the yeast kinetochore-microtubule interface

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1098/rsob.220378

Abstract

The conserved Ndc80 kinetochore complex, Ndc80c, is the principal link between spindle microtubules and centromere associated proteins during chromosome segregation. We used AlphaFold 2 to obtain structural predictions of the Ndc80 “loop” region and the Ndc80:Nuf2 globular head domains that interact with the Dam1 subunit of the decameric DASH/Dam1 complex (Dam1c). The predictions guided design of constructs that readily yielded crystal structures, essentially congruent with the predicted ones. The Ndc80 “loop” is a stiff, straight α-helical “switchback” structure, and flexibility within the long Ndc80c rod occurs instead at a hinge point between the globular head and the loop. Conserved stretches of the Dam1 C terminus bind Ndc80c with a short α helix followed by an extended segment such that phosphorylation of Dam1 serines 257, 265, and 292 by the mitotic kinase Ipl1/Aurora B can release this contact during error correction of mis-attached kinetochores. We integrate the structural results presented here into our current molecular model of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. The model illustrates how multiple interactions between Ndc80c, DASH/Dam1c and the microtubule lattice stabilize kinetochore attachments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.11.09.515846

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1107/S0907444912001308 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1107/S1399004714028132 · DOI
  4. 10.1107/S2059798318006551 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature09423 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gks1195 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00973-X · DOI
  8. 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M504070200 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.020 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.011 · DOI
  12. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Flores, R.L. , Peterson, Z.E. , Zelter, A. , Riffle, M. , Asbury, C.L. , and Davis, T.N. (2022). Three interacting regions of the Ndc80 and Dam1 complexes support microtubule tip-coupling under load. J Cell Biol 221. · DOI
  14. 2022, xia2.multiplex: a multi-crystal data-analysis pipeline, Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol, 78, 752, 10.1107/S2059798322004399 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0807859105 · DOI
  16. 2020, Cdk1 Phosphorylation of the Dam1 Complex Strengthens Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments, Curr Biol, 30, 4491, 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.054 · DOI
  17. Herman, J.A. , Miller, M.P. , and Biggins, S. (2020). chTOG is a conserved mitotic error correction factor. Elife 9. · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature03240 · DOI
  19. 10.1083/jcb.201612195 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.048 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024109 · DOI
  22. Huis In ’t Veld, P.J. , Jeganathan, S. , Petrovic, A. , Singh, P. , John, J. , Krenn, V. , Weissmann, F. , Bange, T. , and Musacchio, A. (2016). Molecular basis of outer kinetochore assembly on CENP-T. Elife 5. · DOI
  23. Jenni, S. , Dimitrova, Y.N. , Valverde, R. , Hinshaw, S.M. , and Harrison, S.C. (2017). Molecular structures of yeast kinetochore subcomplexes and their roles in chromosome segregation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 82. · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.aar6436 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2017, The phosphorylation of a kinetochore protein Dam1 by Aurora B/Ipl1 kinase promotes chromosome bipolar attachment in yeast, Sci Rep, 7, 11880, 10.1038/s41598-017-12329-z · DOI
  26. 10.1107/S0108767390010224 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1242/jcs.055566 · DOI
  30. Kiewisz, R. , Fabig, G. , Conway, W. , Baum, D. , Needleman, D. , and Muller-Reichert, T. (2022). Three-dimensional structure of kinetochore-fibers in human mitotic spindles. Elife 11. · DOI
  31. Kim, J.O. , Zelter, A. , Umbreit, N.T. , Bollozos, A. , Riffle, M. , Johnson, R. , MacCoss, M.J. , Asbury, C.L. , and Davis, T.N. (2017). The Ndc80 complex bridges two Dam1 complex rings. Elife 6. · DOI
  32. 10.1101/gad.449407 · DOI
  33. 2022, CCP4 Cloud for structure determination and project management in macromolecular crystallography, Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol, 78, 1079, 10.1107/S2059798322007987 · DOI
  34. 10.1083/jcb.201210091 · DOI
  35. Legal, T. , Zou, J. , Sochaj, A. , Rappsilber, J. , and Welburn, J.P. (2016). Molecular architecture of the Dam1 complex-microtubule interaction. Open Biol 6. · DOI
  36. 2003, The DASH complex component Ask1 is a cell cycle-regulated Cdk substrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cell Cycle, 2, 143
  37. 10.1074/mcp.M700274-MCP200 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/emboj.2012.356 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.050 · DOI
  40. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1083/jcb.201209154 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.030 · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008423 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nsmb896 · DOI
  45. 10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0135 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/emboj.2012.348 · DOI
  47. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 · DOI
  48. 10.1091/mbc.E19-07-0405 · DOI
  49. 10.1107/S0907444906005270 · DOI
  50. Polley, S. , Müschenborn, H. , Terbeck, M. , De Antoni, A. , Vetter, I.R. , Dogterom, M. , Musacchio, A. , Volkov, V.A. , and Huis In ’t Veld, P.J. (2022). Stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment requires loop-dependent Ndc80-Ndc80 binding. bioRxiv 2022.08.25.505310. · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1091/mbc.E10-10-0841 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/nar/gku316 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4336 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.063 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.040 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/nar/gki458 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/ncomms9161 · DOI
  58. 10.1083/jcb.200702141 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nature03483 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1091/mbc.E12-11-0817 · DOI
  61. 10.1107/S0907444900005072 · DOI
  62. Tickle, I.J. , Flensburg, C. , Keller, P. , Paciorek, W. , Sharff, A. , Vonrhein, C. , and Bricogne, G. (2018). STARANISO (http://staraniso.globalphasing.org/cgi-bin/staraniso.cgi) (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Global Phasing Ltd.).
  63. 10.1038/ncomms5951 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 2016, Conserved Tetramer Junction in the Kinetochore Ndc80 Complex, Cell Rep, 17, 1915, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.065 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/gbe/evx088 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.077 · DOI
  69. 10.1091/mbc.E12-05-0396 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/nsmb1186 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.str.2006.04.007 · DOI
  72. 10.1073/pnas.0501168102 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.019 · DOI
  74. 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1002/pro.4224 · DOI
  76. Zahm, J.A. , Stewart, M.G. , Carrier, J.S. , Harrison, S.C. , and Miller, M.P. (2021). Structural basis of Stu2 recruitment to yeast kinetochores. Elife 10. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zahm, J., Jenni, S., & Harrison, S.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Stephen
Venue
Open Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-11-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
220378-220378
ISSN
2046-2441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323533512
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Open Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐ AC02‐06CH11357)
  • American Cancer Society (PF-21-188-01-CCB)
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC02–06CH11357, GM124165)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM124165)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (DE- AC02-06-CH11357, DE-AC02, AC02–06CH11357, Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357, 06CH11357, P30 GM124165)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
Ndc80 complex, kinetochore-microtubule interface, Dam1 complex, NUF2, centromere, mitotic spindle, kinetochore attachment, Ipl1, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, protein structure prediction, AlphaFold2
MeSH terms
Centromere, Furylfuramide, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Nuclear Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kinetochores, Cell Cycle Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Aurora Kinase B, Aurora Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review