The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural pre-training improves physical accuracy of antibody structure prediction using deep learning
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.immuno.2023.100028 · Paper page
Abstract
Protein folding problem obtained a practical solution recently, owing to advances in deep learning. There are classes of proteins though, such as antibodies, that are structurally unique, where the general solution still lacks. In particular, the prediction of the CDR-H3 loop, which is an instrumental part of an antibody in its antigen recognition abilities, remains a challenge. Antibody-specific deep learning frameworks were proposed to tackle this problem noting great progress, both on accuracy and speed fronts. Oftentimes though, the original networks produce physically implausible bond geometries that then need to undergo a time-consuming energy minimization process. Here we hypothesized that pre-training the network on a large, augmented set of models with correct physical geometries, rather than a small set of real antibody X-ray structures, would allow the network to learn better bond geometries. We show that fine-tuning such a pre-trained network on a task of shape prediction on real X-ray structures improves the number of correct peptide bond distances. We further demonstrate that pre-training allows the network to produce physically plausible shapes on an artificial set of CDR-H3s, showing the ability to generalize to the vast antibody sequence space. We hope that our strategy will benefit the development of deep learning antibody models that rapidly generate physically plausible geometries, without the burden of time-consuming energy minimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 2022, Antibodies to watch in 2022, MAbs, 14, 2014296, 10.1080/19420862.2021.2014296 · DOI
- 10.1038/d41573-021-00079-7 · DOI
- 2021, Data mining patented antibody sequences, MAbs, 13, 1892366, 10.1080/19420862.2021.1892366 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbac267 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01753 · DOI
- 2017, Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction, Bioinformatics, 33, 1346, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa457 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.24567 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.25291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.11.20.517210 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, NanoNet: Rapid and accurate end-to-end nanobody modeling by deep learning, Front. Immunol, 13, 958584, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.958584 · DOI
- 2022, Antibody structure prediction using interpretable deep learning, Patterns (N Y), 3, 100406, 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100406 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.04.20.488972 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.11.04.514231 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.10.07.511322 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.11.10.515918 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420862.2016.1205773 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.24534 · DOI
- 10.1002/PRO.4205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1800708 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.11.09.515600 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010271 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Construction of a Deep Neural Network Energy Function for Protein Physics, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 18, 5649, 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00069 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/database/bay040 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Public Baseline and shared response structures support the theory of antibody repertoire functional commonality, PLoS Comput. Biol, 17, e1008781, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008781 · DOI
- 2019, Commonality despite exceptional diversity in the baseline human antibody repertoire, Nature, 566, 393, 10.1038/s41586-019-0879-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac151 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Phage Display Derived Monoclonal Antibodies: From Bench to Bedside, Front. Immunol, 11, 1986, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01986 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01698 · DOI · Paper page
- Melnyk, I. , Das, P. , Chenthamarakshan, V. , and Lozano, A. (2021). Benchmarking deep generative models for diverse antibody sequence design. arXiv [q-bio.BM].
- 10.1002/prot.22658 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Antibody side chain conformations are position-dependent, Proteins, 86, 383, 10.1002/prot.25453 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Kończak, J., Janusz, B., Młokosiewicz, J., Satława, T., Wróbel, S., Dudzic, P., & Krawczyk, K.
- Corresponding author
- Krawczyk, Konrad
- Venue
- ImmunoInformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-12-09
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 100028-100028
- ISSN
- 2667-1190 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381332577
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- ImmunoInformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- antibody structure prediction, fine-tuning, energy minimization, deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review