The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flattening the curve - How to get better results with small deep-mutational-scanning datasets
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26686 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteins are utilized in various biotechnological applications, often requiring the optimization of protein properties by introducing specific amino acid exchanges. Deep mutational scanning (DMS) is an effective high-throughput method for evaluating the effects of these exchanges on protein function. DMS data can then inform the training of a neural network to predict the impact of mutations. Most approaches employ some representation of the protein sequence for training and prediction. As proteins are characterized by complex structures and intricate residue interaction networks, directly providing structural information as input reduces the need to learn these features from the data. We introduce a method for encoding protein structures as stacked 2D contact maps, which capture residue interactions, their evolutionary conservation, and mutation-induced interaction changes. Furthermore, we explored techniques to augment neural network training performance on smaller DMS datasets. To validate our approach, we trained three neural network architectures originally used for image analysis on three DMS datasets, and we compared their performances with networks trained solely on protein sequences. The results confirm the effectiveness of the protein structure encoding in machine learning efforts on DMS data. Using structural representations as direct input to the networks, along with data augmentation and pre-training, significantly reduced demands on training data size and improved prediction performance, especially on smaller datasets, while performance on large datasets was on par with state-of-the-art sequence convolutional neural networks. The methods presented here have the potential to provide the same workflow as DMS without the experimental and financial burden of testing thousands of mutants. Additionally, we present an open-source, user-friendly software tool to make these data analysis techniques accessible, particularly to biotechnology and protein engineering researchers who wish to apply them to their mutagenesis data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00450-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1127 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1534/g3.119.400535 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.1492 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1806133115 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12915-022-01304-4 · DOI
- 10.1101/2020.06.17.157982 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2022.08.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/humu.22225 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3769 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0138-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01100-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cels.2017.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1215251110 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2104878118 · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj.4750 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.022 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22458 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb1203-980 · DOI · Paper page
- Johnson M , Zaretskaya I , Raytselis Y , Merezhuk Y , McGinnis S , Madden TL . NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008;. · DOI
- McWilliam H , Li W , Uludag M , Squizzato S , Park YM , Buso N , et al. Analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;. · DOI
- 10.1109/5.726791 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang G , Liu Z , Van Der Maaten L , Weinberger KQ . Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2017. p. 2261–2269. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.2201.09792 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.117.300064 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0227621 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113696 · DOI
- Caron M , Bojanowski P , Mairal J , Joulin A. Unsupervised Pre-Training of Image Features on Non-Curated Data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 2019. · DOI · Paper page
- Iorga C , Neagoe VE . A Deep CNN Approach with Transfer Learning for Image Recognition. In: 2019 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI); 2019. p. 1–6. · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Wirnsberger, G., Pritišanac, I., Oberdorfer, G., & Gruber, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Graz (AT)
- Medical University of Graz (AT)
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Gruber, Karl
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-03-27
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 886-902
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392955080
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund (DOC 130, 10.55776/DOC130)
- Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- deep mutational scanning, residue interaction networks, mutation effect prediction, limited training data, data augmentation, pre-training, protein engineering, protein function prediction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review