PreprintCited by 98Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic language model predicts protein co-regulation and function

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-46947-9 · Paper page

Abstract

Deciphering the relationship between a gene and its genomic context is fundamental to understanding and engineering biological systems. Machine learning has shown promise in learning latent relationships underlying the sequence-structure-function paradigm from massive protein sequence datasets. However, to date, limited attempts have been made in extending this continuum to include higher order genomic context information. Evolutionary processes dictate the specificity of genomic contexts in which a gene is found across phylogenetic distances, and these emergent genomic patterns can be leveraged to uncover functional relationships between gene products. Here, we trained a genomic language model (gLM) on millions of metagenomic scaffolds to learn the latent functional and regulatory relationships between genes. gLM learns contextualized protein embeddings that capture the genomic context as well as the protein sequence itself, and encode biologically meaningful and functionally relevant information (e.g. enzymatic function, taxonomy). Our analysis of the attention patterns demonstrates that gLM is learning co-regulated functional modules (i.e. operons). Our findings illustrate that gLM’s unsupervised deep learning of the metagenomic corpus is an effective and promising approach to encode functional semantics and regulatory syntax of genes in their genomic contexts and uncover complex relationships between genes in a genomic region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.04.07.536042

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.05.007 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rives, A. et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Elnaggar, A. , et al. ProtTrans: Towards Cracking the Language of Life’s Code Through Self-Supervised Deep Learning and High Performance Computing. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2020). · DOI
  5. Madani, A. et al. Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families. Nat. Biotechnol. 1–8 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1101/2022.12.15.519894 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/2405519 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.1089370 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nrmicro3218 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001284 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1126/science.1218198 · DOI
  12. 2021, Leveraging Microbial Genomes and Genomic Context for Chemical Discovery, Acc. Chem. Res, 54, 2788, 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00100 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41596-019-0211-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002230 · DOI
  15. 2022, Deciphering microbial gene function using natural language processing, Nat. Commun, 13, 5731, 10.1038/s41467-022-33397-4 · DOI
  16. Konno, N. & Iwasaki, W . Machine learning enables prediction of metabolic system evolution in bacteria. Sci Adv 9, eadc9130 (2023). · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41592-021-01252-x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2021, DNABERT: pre-trained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers model for DNA-language in genome, Bioinformatics, 37, 2112, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab083 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1101/2023.01.11.523679 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1101/2022.10.10.511571 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Vaswani, Shazeer & Parmar. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.
  23. Devlin, J. , Chang, M.-W. , Lee, K. & Toutanova, K . BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arXiv [cs.CL ] (2018).
  24. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/nar/gkac1080 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453 · DOI
  27. Jeffery, C. J . Protein moonlighting: what is it, and why is it important? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, (2018). · DOI
  28. 2017, Fuzziness enables context dependence of protein interactions, FEBS Lett, 591, 2682, 10.1002/1873-3468.12762 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.017 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1002 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/1462-2920.12112 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/2006jg000268 · DOI
  33. 2022, Expression of divergent methyl/alkyl coenzyme M reductases from uncultured archaea, Commun Biol, 5, 1113, 10.1038/s42003-022-04057-6 · DOI
  34. Reif, E. et al. Visualizing and measuring the geometry of BERT. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 32, (2019).
  35. Vanni, C. et al. Unifying the known and unknown microbial coding sequence space. Elife 11, (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2022, Using deep learning to annotate the protein universe, Nat. Biotechnol, 40, 932, 10.1038/s41587-021-01179-w · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1162/tacl_a_00349/96482 · DOI
  38. Vig, J. et al. BERTology Meets Biology: Interpreting Attention in Protein Language Models. arXiv [cs.CL ] (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1002/cpbi.43 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00642.x · DOI
  41. 2023, Structures of the holo CRISPR RNA-guided transposon integration complex, Nature, 613, 775, 10.1038/s41586-022-05573-5 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Rybarski, J. R. , Hu, K. , Hill, A. M. , Wilke, C. O. & Finkelstein, I. J . Metagenomic discovery of CRISPR-associated transposons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, (2021). · DOI
  43. 10.1128/mBio.02938-21 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41586-019-1323-z · DOI
  45. 10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.7554/eLife.02030 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Lupo, U. , Sgarbossa, D. & Bitbol, A.-F. Pairing interacting protein sequences using masked language modeling. arXiv (2023) doi:2308.07136. · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1186/s40168-020-00990-y · DOI
  49. Kaplan, J. , et al. Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2020).
  50. 2014, Multimodal Neural Language Models, 32, 595
  51. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Liu, Y. , et al. RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach. arXiv [cs.CL ] (2019).
  54. Huang, Z. , Liang, D. , Xu, P. & Xiang, B . Improve Transformer Models with Better Relative Position Embeddings. arXiv [cs.CL ] (2020). · DOI
  55. Loshchilov, I. & Hutter, F . Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization. arXiv [cs.LG ] (2017).
  56. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm098 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1126/sci-ence.adf2465 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.3.282 · DOI
  60. Piovesan, A. , Caracausi, M. , Antonaros, F. , Pelleri, M. C. & Vitale, L . GeneBase 1.1: a tool to summarize data from NCBI gene datasets and its application to an update of human gene statistics. Database 2016, (2016). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hwang, Y., Cornman, A. L., Kellogg, E. H., Ovchinnikov, S., & Girguis, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tatta Bio (US)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hwang, Yunha
  • Ovchinnikov, Sergey
  • Girguis, Peter R.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-04-08
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
2880-2880
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393870943
Cited by
98
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 20
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1635365, 2032259, 80NSSC18K1140)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC19K1427, 80NSSC18K1140)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Harvard University
  • Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
  • National Institutes of Health (DP5OD026389)
  • FAS Division of Science, Harvard University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
genomic language models, operon, protein embeddings, gene function prediction, gene expression regulation, attention patterns, phylogenetic context, functional modules, enzyme function
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Operon, Phylogeny, Proteins, Semantics, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review