The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pairing interacting protein sequences using masked language modeling
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2311887121 · Paper page
Abstract
Predicting which proteins interact together from amino-acid sequences is an important task. We develop a method to pair interacting protein sequences which leverages the power of protein language models trained on multiple sequence alignments, such as MSA Transformer and the EvoFormer module of AlphaFold. We formulate the problem of pairing interacting partners among the paralogs of two protein families in a differentiable way. We introduce a method called DiffPALM that solves it by exploiting the ability of MSA Transformer to fill in masked amino acids in multiple sequence alignments using the surrounding context. MSA Transformer encodes coevolution between functionally or structurally coupled amino acids within protein chains. It also captures inter-chain coevolution, despite being trained on single-chain data. Relying on MSA Transformer without fine-tuning, DiffPALM outperforms existing coevolution-based pairing methods on difficult benchmarks of shallow multiple sequence alignments extracted from ubiquitous prokaryotic protein datasets. It also outperforms an alternative method based on a state-of-the-art protein language model trained on single sequences. Paired alignments of interacting protein sequences are a crucial ingredient of supervised deep learning methods to predict the three-dimensional structure of protein complexes. Starting from sequences paired by DiffPALM substantially improves the structure prediction of some eukaryotic protein complexes by AlphaFold-Multimer. It also achieves competitive performance with using orthology-based pairing. Significance statement: Deep learning has brought major advances to the analysis of biological sequences. Self-supervised models, based on approaches from natural language processing and trained on large ensembles of protein sequences, efficiently learn statistical dependence in this data. This includes coevolution patterns between structurally or functionally coupled amino acids, which allows them to capture structural contacts. We propose a method to pair interacting protein sequences which leverages the power of a protein language model trained on multiple sequence alignments. Our method performs well for small datasets that are challenging for existing methods. It can improve structure prediction of protein complexes by supervised methods, which remains more challenging than that of single-chain proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 87
- 10.1038/nbt.2831 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Single-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning, Nat Biotechnol, 40, 1617, 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- I. Humphreys , J. Pei , M. Baek , A. Krishnakumar , I. Anishchenko , S. Ovchinnikov , J. Zhang , T. J. Ness , S. Banjade , S. R. Bagde , V. G. Stancheva , X. H. Li , K. Liu , Z. Zheng , D. J. Barrero , U. Roy , J. Kuper , I. S. Ferńandez , B. Szakal , D. Branzei , J. Rizo , C. Kisker , E. C. Greene , S. Biggins , S. Keeney , E. A. Miller , J. C. Fromme , T. L. Hendrickson , Q. Cong , and D. Baker , “Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes,” Science, vol. 374, no. 6573, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
- R. Evans , M. O’Neill , A. Pritzel , N. Antropova , A. Senior , T. Green , A. ̌ídek , R. Bates , S. Blackwell , J. Yim , O. Ronneberger , S. Bodenstein , M. Zielinski , A. Bridgland , A. Potapenko , A. Cowie , K. Tunyasuvunakool , R. Jain , E. Clancy , P. Kohli , J. Jumper , and D. Hassabis , “Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer,” bioRxiv, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/S41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- P. Bryant , G. Pozzati , and A. Elofsson , “Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2,” Nat Commun, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1265, 2022. · DOI · Paper page
- H. Schweke , T. Levin , M. Pacesa , C. A. Goverde , P. Kumar , Y. Duhoo , L. J. Dornfeld , B. Dubreuil , S. Georgeon , S. Ovchinnikov , D. N. Woolfson , B. E. Correia , S. Dey , and E. D. Levy , “An atlas of protein homo-oligomerization across domains of life,” bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102594 · DOI
- L. T. Alexander , J. Durairaj , A. Kryshtafovych , L. A. Abriata , Y. Bayo , G. Bhabha , C. Breyton , S. G. Caulton , J. Chen , S. Degroux , D. C. Ekiert , B. S. Erlandsen , P. L. Freddolino , D. Gilzer , C. Greening , J. M. Grimes , R. Grinter , M. Gurusaran , M. D. Hartmann , C. J. Hitchman , J. R. Keown , A. Kropp , P. Kursula , A. L. Lovering , B. Lemaitre , A. Lia , S. Liu , M. Logotheti , S. Lu , S. sson , M. D. Miller , G. Minasov , H. H. Niemann , F. Opazo , G. N. Phillips , O. R. Davies , S. Rommelaere , M. Rosas-Lemus , P. Roversi , K. Satchell , N. Smith , M. A. Wilson , K. L. Wu , X. Xia , H. Xiao , W. Zhang , Z. H. Zhou , K. Fidelis , M. Topf , J. Moult , and T. Schwede , “Protein target highlights in CASP15: Analysis of models by structure providers,” Proteins, pp. 1–29, 2023. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0805923106 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 113, 185
- 2016, Simultaneous identification of specifically interacting paralogs and interprotein contacts by direct coupling analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 113, 186
- 10.1016/J.SBI.2017.10.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bib/bbac208 · DOI
- 2023, Improved the heterodimer protein complex prediction with protein language models, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24, bbad221, 10.1093/bib/bbad221 · DOI
- 2013, The MIntAct project—IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases, Nucleic Acids Research, 42, D358
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.003 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.02030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaw6718 · DOI · Paper page
- A. G. Green , H. Elhabashy , K. P. Brock , R. Maddamsetti , O. Kohlbacher , and D. S. Marks , “Large-scale discovery of protein interactions at residue resolution using co-evolution calculated from genomic sequences,” Nat Commun, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1396, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky420 · DOI
- 2021, Limits and potential of combined folding and docking, Bioinformatics, 38, 954
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01038-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00114-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg278 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkl112 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20948 · DOI
- J. M. Izarzugaza , D. Juan , C. Pons , F. Pazos , and A. Valencia , “Enhancing the prediction of protein pairings between interacting families using orthology information,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 9, p. 35, 2008. · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.092452.109 · DOI
- S. Bradde , A. Braunstein , H. Mahmoudi , F. Tria , M. Weigt , and R. Zecchina , “Aligning graphs and finding substructures by a cavity approach,” EPL, vol. 89, no. 3, 2010. · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts109 · DOI
- M. El-Kebir , T. Marschall , I. Wohlers , M. Patterson , J. Heringa , A. Schonhuth , and G. W. Klau , “Mapping proteins in the presence of paralogs using units of coevolution,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 14 Suppl 15, p. S18, 2013. · DOI
- 2001, “Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein–protein interaction,” Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 14, 609, 10.1093/protein/14.9.609 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0709671105 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1009 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq137 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv102 · DOI
- 1995, A method to predict functional residues in proteins, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2, 171, 10.1038/nsb0295-171 · DOI
- 1999, Correlated mutations in models of protein sequences: phylogenetic and structural effects, in Statistics in molecular biology and genetics - IMS Lecture Notes - Monograph Series, 33, 236
- 10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0016163 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1323734111 · DOI
- L. Burger and E. van Nimwegen , “Accurate prediction of protein-protein interactions from sequence alignments using a Bayesian method,” Mol. Syst. Biol., vol. 4, p. 165, 2008. · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006401 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007179 · DOI
- 2022, Correlations from structure and phylogeny combine constructively in the inference of protein partners from sequences, PLoS Comput. Biol, 18, e1010147, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010147 · DOI
- 2023, Combining phylogeny and coevolution improves the inference of interaction partners among paralogous proteins, PLoS Comput. Biol, 19, e1011010, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011010 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, “MSA Transformer,”, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 139, 8844
- U. Lupo , D. Sgarbossa , and A.-F. Bitbol , “Protein language models trained on multiple sequence alignments learn phylogenetic relationships,” Nat Commun, vol. 13, no. 6298, 2022. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.79854 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab761 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.170548 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-10-315 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1023 · DOI
- 10.1038/47056 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1000 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, “InterPro in 2022,”, Nucleic Acids Research, 51, D418
- 10.1093/nar/gki775 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0162755 · DOI
- P. Bryant and F. Nóe, “Improved protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-multimer by denoising the MSA profile,” bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
- J. Liu , Z. Guo , T. Wu , R. S. Roy , F. Quadir , C. Chen , and J. Cheng , “Enhancing AlphaFold-Multimer-based protein complex structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15,” bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI
- B. Wallner , “Improved multimer prediction using massive sampling with AlphaFold in CASP15,” Proteins, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
- U. Ghani , I. Desta , A. Jindal , O. Khan , G. Jones , N. Hashemi , S. Kotelnikov , D. Padhorny , S. Vajda , and D. Kozakov , “Improved docking of protein models by a combination of Alphafold2 and ClusPro,” bioRxiv, 2022. · DOI · Paper page
- K. Olechnovič , L. Valaňcauskas , J. Dapkunas , and Č. Venclovas , “Prediction of protein assemblies by structure sampling followed by interface-focused scoring,” bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, “FlashAttention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with IO-awareness,”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 344
- A. Hawkins-Hooker , D. T. Jones , and B. Paige , “Using domain-domain interactions to probe the limitations of MSA pairing strategies,” in Machine Learning for Structural Biology Workshop , NeurIPS, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mlsb.io/papers2022/UsingdomaindomaininteractionstoprobethelimitationsofMSApairingstrategies.pdf
- 2022, Exploring evolution-aware & -free protein language models as protein function predictors, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 873
- 2023, Generating interacting protein sequences using domain-to-domain translation, Bioinformatics, 39, btad401, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad401 · DOI
- 2020, Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning, Nat Methods, 17, 184, 10.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 · DOI
- 2022, ScanNet: an interpretable geometric deep learning model for structure-based protein binding site prediction, Nat Methods, 19, 730, 10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · DOI · Paper page
- L. F. Krapp , L. A. Abriata , F. Cortés Rodriguez, and M. Dal Peraro , “PeSTo: parameter-free geometric deep learning for accurate prediction of protein binding interfaces,” Nat Commun, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 2175, 2023. · DOI
- M. N. Pun , A. Ivanov , Q. Bellamy , Z. Montague , C. LaMont , P. Bradley , J. Otwinowski , and A. Nourmohammad , “Learning the shape of protein micro-environments with a holographic convolutional neural network,” bioRxiv, 2022. · DOI
- F. Wu , L. Wu , D. Radev , J. Xu , and S. Z. Li , “Integration of pre-trained protein language models into geometric deep learning networks,” Commun Biol, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 876, 2023. · DOI
- Y. Si and C. Yan , “Protein language model embedded geometric graphs power inter-protein contact prediction,” bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
- J. Su , C. Han , Y. Zhou , J. Shan , X. Zhou , and F. Yuan , “SaProt: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary,” bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI
- G. E. Mena , D. Belanger , S. Linderman , and J. Snoek , “Learning latent permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn networks,” 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018 - Conference Track Proceedings, pp. 1–22, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=Byt3oJ-0W
- M. D. Zeiler , “ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method,” arXiv, 2012.
- 10.1002/nav.3800020109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Devlin , M.-W. Chang , K. Lee , and K. Toutanova , “BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). Minneapolis, Minnesota: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, pp. 4171–4186.
- A. Wang and K. Cho , “BERT has a mouth, and it must speak: BERT as a Markov random field language model,” arXiv, 2019.
- K. Goyal , C. Dyer , and T. Berg-Kirkpatrick , “Exposing the implicit energy networks behind masked language models via Metropolis–Hastings,” arXiv, 2021.
- R. Rao , J. Meier , T. Sercu , S. Ovchinnikov , and A. Rives , “Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learners,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=fylclEqgvgd · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2017228118 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Lupo, U., Sgarbossa, D., & Bitbol, A.-F.
- Affiliations
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Lupo, Umberto
- Sgarbossa, Damiano
- Bitbol, Anne-Florence
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-08-14
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- e2311887121-e2311887121
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11228504
- OpenAlex
- W4399940408
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- DeepMind
- European Commission (851173, HORIZON2020)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction prediction, masked language modeling, multiple sequence alignment, coevolution, paralogs, protein language models, protein complex structure prediction, AlphaFold-Multimer
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Computational Biology, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review