The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building alternative splicing and evolution-aware sequence-structure maps for protein repeats
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jsb.2023.107997 · Paper page
Abstract
Alternative splicing of repeats in proteins provides a mechanism for rewiring and fine-tuning protein interaction networks. In this work, we developed a robust and versatile method, ASPRING, to identify alternatively spliced protein repeats from gene annotations. ASPRING leverages evolutionary meaningful alternative splicing-aware hierarchical graphs to provide maps between protein repeats sequences and 3D structures. We re-think the definition of repeats by explicitly accounting for transcript diversity across several genes/species. Using a stringent sequence-based similarity criterion, we detected over 5,000 evolutionary conserved repeats by screening virtually all human protein-coding genes and their orthologs across a dozen species. Through a joint analysis of their sequences and structures, we extracted specificity-determining sequence signatures and assessed their implication in experimentally resolved and modelled protein interactions. Our findings demonstrate the widespread alternative usage of protein repeats in modulating protein interactions and open avenues for targeting repeat-mediated interactions. Highlights: Robust detection of alternatively used repeated protein regions in evolution The approach relies on sequence similarity and identifies conserved signatures Mapping of the repeats onto protein isoform 3D models predicted by AlphaFold 5 000 repeats detected over the human coding fraction, about one third disordered Assessment of the structural coverage of their interactions with protein partners
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1093/molbev/msw194 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4392 · DOI
- others, 2021, RepeatsDB in 2021: improved data and extended classification for protein tandem repeat structures, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D452, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1097 · DOI
- 2020, A new census of protein tandem repeats and their relationship with intrinsic disorder, Genes, 11, 407, 10.3390/genes11040407 · DOI
- 2019, DeepSymmetry: Using 3D convolutional networks for identifica-tion of tandem repeats and internal symmetries in protein structures, Bioinformatics, 35, 5113, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz454 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv306 · DOI
- 2000, Rapid automatic detection and alignment of repeats in protein se-quences, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 41, 224, 10.1002/1097-0134(20001101)41:2<224::AID-PROT70>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 2006, Expansion of protein domain repeats, PLoS computational biology, 2, e114, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020114 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3136 · DOI
- 2020, A novel approach to investigate the evolution of structured tandem repeat protein families by exon duplication, Journal of Structural Biology, 212, 107608, 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107608 · DOI
- 2022, The Difference in Structural States between Canonical Proteins and Their Isoforms Established by Proteome-Wide Bioinformatics Analysis, Biomolecules, 12, 1610, 10.3390/biom12111610 · DOI
- 2021, The clinical importance of tandem exon duplication-derived substitutions, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, 8232, 10.1093/nar/gkab623 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.274696.120 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg1451 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkm1054 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrm.2017.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.083 · DOI · Paper page
- 2015, Alternatively spliced homologous exons have ancient origins and are highly expressed at the protein level, PLoS computational biology, 11, e1004325, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004325 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evv076 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S181 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Structure-guided isoform identification for the human transcriptome, Elife, 11, e82556, 10.7554/eLife.82556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12859-019-2669-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1049 · DOI · Paper page
- Ilzhoefer, D. ; Heinzinger, M. ; Rost, B. SETH predicts nuances of residue disorder from protein embeddings. bioRxiv 2022, 2022–06. · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbt092 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2009.287 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41374-019-0197-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi0521543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2188-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
- van Kempen, M. ; Kim, S. S. ; Tumescheit, C. ; Mirdita, M. ; Lee, J. ; Gilchrist, C. L. M. ; Söding, J. ; Steinegger, M. Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nature Biotechnology 2023, · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Szatkownik, A., Zea, D. J., Richard, H., & Laine, E.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Richard, Hugues
- Venue
- Journal of Structural Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-04-30
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 107997-107997
- ISSN
- 1047-8477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4384157087
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Structural Biology (acceptedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Publication server of the Robert Koch Institute (Robert Kock Institute) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-20-CE45-0010, ANR-17-CE12-0009, ANR-17)
- Université Paris-Saclay
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- alternative splicing, protein repeats, protein isoforms, AlphaFold models, protein-protein interaction, intrinsically disordered regions, sequence signatures, orthologs, protein-protein interaction network
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Proteins, Alternative Splicing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review