PreprintCited by 7Gene expression and cancer classificationPlant Molecular Biology ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expression-based machine learning models for predicting plant tissue identity

Open access
Palande, Sourabh, Arsenault, Jeremy, Basurto-Lozada, Patricia, Bleich, Andrew, Brown, Brianna N. I., Buysse, Sophia F., Connors, Noelle A., Adhikari, Sikta Das, Dobson, Kara C., Guerra-Castillo, Francisco Xavier, Guerrero-Carrillo, Maria F., Harlow, Sophia, Herrera-Orozco, Héctor, Hightower, Asia T., Izquierdo, Paulo, Jacobs, MacKenzie, Johnson, Nicholas A., Leuenberger, Wendy, Lopez-Hernandez, Alessandro, Luckie-Duque, Alicia, Martínez-Avila, Camila, Mendoza-Galindo, Eddy J., Plancarte, David, Schuster, Jenny M., Shomer, Harry, Sitar, Sidney C., Steensma, Anne K., Thomson, Joanne Elise, Villaseñor-Amador, Damián, Waterman, Robin, Webster, Brandon M., Whyte, Madison, Zorilla-Azcué, Sofía, Montgomery, Beronda L., Husbands, Aman Y., Krishnan, Arjun, Percival, Sarah, Munch, Elizabeth, VanBuren, Robert, Chitwood, Daniel H., Rougon-Cardoso, Alejandra·2023·Applications in Plant Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1002/aps3.11621 · Paper page

Abstract

The selection of Arabidopsis as a model organism played a pivotal role in advancing genomic science, firmly establishing the cornerstone of today ‘s plant molecular biology. Competing frameworks to select an agricultural- or ecological-based model species, or to decentralize plant science and study a multitude of diverse species, were selected against in favor of building core knowledge in a species that would facilitate genome-enabled research that could assumedly be transferred to other plants. Here, we examine the ability of models based on Arabidopsis gene expression data to predict tissue identity in other flowering plant species. Comparing different machine learning algorithms, models trained and tested on Arabidopsis data achieved near perfect precision and recall values using the K-Nearest Neighbor method, whereas when tissue identity is predicted across the flowering plants using models trained on Arabidopsis data, precision values range from 0.69 to 0.74 and recall from 0.54 to 0.64, depending on the algorithm used. Below-ground tissue is more predictable than other tissue types, and the ability to predict tissue identity is not correlated with phylogenetic distance from Arabidopsis . This suggests that gene expression signatures rather than marker genes are more valuable to create models for tissue and cell type prediction in plants. Our data-driven results highlight that, in hindsight, the assertion that knowledge from Arabidopsis is translatable to other plants is not always true. Considering the current landscape of abundant sequencing data and computational resources, it may be prudent to reevaluate the scientific emphasis on Arabidopsis and to prioritize the exploration of plant diversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.08.20.554029

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1111/boj.12385 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/35048692 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1105/tpc.19.00332 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/aob/mcg057 · DOI
  5. 2013, Hyperopt: A python library for optimizing the hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms, Proceedings of the 12th Python in Science Conference, 13, 20
  6. 10.1101/gr.3723405 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x · DOI
  8. 2017, Unlocking the potential of plant phenotyping data through integration and data-driven approaches, Current Opinion in Systems Biology, 4, 58, 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.002 · DOI
  9. 1995, Support-vector networks, Machine Learning, 20, 273, 10.1007/BF00994018 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 1967, Nearest neighbor pattern classification, IEEE transactions on Information Theory, 13, 21, 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/hdy.2013.16 · DOI
  12. Dwyer, W. , Ibe, C.N. and Rhee, S.Y. , 2022. Renaming Indigenous crops and addressing colonial bias in scientific language. Trends in Plant Science. · DOI
  13. 2020, Amalgamated cross-species transcriptomes reveal organ-specific propensity in gene expression evolution, Nature Communications, 11, 4459, 10.1038/s41467-020-18090-8 · DOI
  14. Haykin, S. , 1998. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation.Prentice Hall PTR.
  15. 1995, Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition, 1, 278, 10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 · DOI
  16. 2011, The roots of bioinformatics in theoretical biology, PLoS Computational Biology, 7, e1002021, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002021 · DOI
  17. 2009, Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources, Nature Protocols, 4, 44, 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nmeth.4642 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2021, Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals conserved programmes underpinning organogenesis and reproduction in land plants, Nature Plants, 7, 1143, 10.1038/s41477-021-00958-2 · DOI
  20. 2021, In Advances in Botanical Research, 100, 249
  21. 2004, Solanaceae—a model for linking genomics with biodiversity, Comparative and Functional Genomics, 5, 285, 10.1002/cfg.393 · DOI
  22. 2018, A guide to sequence your favorite plant genomes, Applications in Plant Sciences, 6, e1030, 10.1002/aps3.1030 · DOI
  23. Lim, P.K. , Zheng, X. , Goh, J.C. and Mutwil, M. , 2022. Exploiting plant transcriptomic databases: resources, tools, and approaches. Plant Communications, p.100323. · DOI
  24. 2021, Representation and participation across 20 years of plant genome sequencing, Nature Plants, 7, 1571, 10.1038/s41477-021-01031-8 · DOI
  25. Marks, R.A. , Amézquita, E.J. , Percival, S. , Rougon-Cardoso, A. , Chibici-Revneanu, C. , Tebele, S.M. , Farrant, J.M. , Chitwood, D.H. , VanBuren, R. , 2023. A critical analysis of plant science literature reveals ongoing inequities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · DOI
  26. Mason, L. , Baxter, J. , Bartlett, P. and Frean, M. , 1999. Boosting algorithms as gradient descent. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 12.
  27. 10.15252/embr.201541001 · DOI
  28. 10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.000521 · DOI
  29. 10.1104/pp.125.1.15 · DOI
  30. Michael, T.P. and Jackson, S. , 2013. The first 50 plant genomes. The Plant Genome, 6(2). · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00908.x · DOI
  32. Palande, S. , Kaste, J.A. , Roberts, M.D. , Aba, K.S. , Claucherty, C. , Dacon, J. , Doko, R. , Jayakody, T.B. , Jeffery, H.R. , Kelly, N. and Manousidaki, A. , 2023. The topological shape of gene expression across the evolution of flowering plants. PLOS Biology. · DOI
  33. Multinational Arabidopsis Steering Committee, 2020, Current status of the multinational Arabidopsis community, Plant Direct, 4, e00248, 10.1002/pld3.248 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/gky336 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/nph.13687 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01797-0 · DOI
  37. 2009, Maize (Zea mays): a model organism for basic and applied research in plant biology, Cold Spring Harb Protoc, 10, pdb
  38. 2022, Plant public RNALseq database: a comprehensive online database for expression analysis of∼ 45 000 plant public RNALseq libraries, Plant Biotechnology Journal, 20, 806, 10.1111/pbi.13798 · DOI
  39. 2002, Precision agriculture—a worldwide overview, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 36, 113, 10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00096-0 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.molp.2020.08.001 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Palande, S., Arsenault, J., Basurto-Lozada, P., Bleich, A., Brown, B. N. I., Buysse, S. F., Connors, N. A., Adhikari, S. D., Dobson, K. C., Guerra-Castillo, F. X., Guerrero-Carrillo, M. F., Harlow, S., Herrera-Orozco, H., Hightower, A. T., Izquierdo, P., Jacobs, M., Johnson, N. A., Leuenberger, W., Lopez-Hernandez, A., Luckie-Duque, A., Martínez-Avila, C., Mendoza-Galindo, E. J., Plancarte, D., Schuster, J. M., Shomer, H., Sitar, S. C., Steensma, A. K., Thomson, J. E., Villaseñor-Amador, D., Waterman, R., Webster, B. M., Whyte, M., Zorilla-Azcué, S., Montgomery, B. L., Husbands, A. Y., Krishnan, A., Percival, S., Munch, E., VanBuren, R., Chitwood, D. H., & Rougon-Cardoso, A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • Grinnell College (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Chitwood, Daniel H.
Venue
Applications in Plant Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-08-21
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e11621-e11621
ISSN
2168-0450 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403567301
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Applications in Plant Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2310357, 1828149, 2310355, 2039489, 2310356)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
gene expression signatures, Arabidopsis, cross-species transferability, flowering plants, k-nearest neighbors, model organism selection, phylogenetic distance, marker genes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review