PreprintCited by 3Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant Molecular Biology ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Allosteric activation of the co-receptor BAK1 by the EFR receptor kinase initiates immune signaling

Open access
Mühlenbeck, Henning, Tsutsui, Yuko, Lemmon, Mark A., Bender, Kyle W., Zipfel, Cyril·2023·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.92110 · Paper page

Abstract

Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domainshave been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (ELONGATION FACTOR TU RECEPTOR) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1-ASSOCIATED KINASE 1/SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.08.23.554490

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. 10.1104/pp.108.123216 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/ja043277y · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.2108242118 · DOI
  4. 10.1042/BCJ20220372 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003313 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41598-019-46171-2 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nri.2016.77 · DOI
  9. 10.1186/1746-4811-5-3 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.029 · DOI
  11. Dufayard, J.-F. , Bettembourg, M. , Fischer, I. , Droc, G. , Guiderdoni, E. , Périn, C. , Chantret, N. , Diévart, A ., 2017. New Insights on Leucine-Rich Repeats Receptor-Like Kinase Orthologous Relationships in Angiosperms. Front. Plant Sci. 8. · DOI
  12. 10.1042/BST20130115 · DOI
  13. 10.1101/2023.07.21.550125 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.010 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80265-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.288.5475.2360 · DOI
  17. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040957 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature10153 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/jps.22432 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/MCB.00943-14 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.046 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.molp.2021.05.006 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/jxb/erx022 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/scisignal.aav3810 · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.M115.691428 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.009 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1302154110 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/1472-6750-8-91 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.005 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0909705107 · DOI
  33. 10.15252/embj.2019102856 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100705 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.1248849 · DOI
  36. 10.1101/2023.03.13.532436 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41592-019-0459-y · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000127 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/BF00134183 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1074/jbc.M117.792762 · DOI
  43. 10.1186/s13059-016-0955-7 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00814-0 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1073/pnas.0810249106 · DOI
  46. 10.1101/2023.09.12.557419 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/s41586-018-0471-x · DOI
  49. 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  50. 10.1186/s12870-014-0374-4 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41467-021-20932-y · DOI
  52. 10.1105/tpc.111.084301 · DOI
  53. 10.1126/science.1242468 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1073/pnas.2100844118 · DOI
  55. 10.1074/jbc.M109.096842 · DOI
  56. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002046 · DOI
  57. 10.15252/embj.201488698 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.04.011 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.018 · DOI
  60. 10.1104/pp.103.021964 · DOI
  61. 10.1073/pnas.181141598 · DOI
  62. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147203 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.09.006 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/nar/gkw256 · DOI
  65. Trusov, Y. , Botella, J.R ., 2016. Plant G-Proteins Come of Age: Breaking the Bond with Animal Models. Front. Chem. 4. · DOI
  66. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(19991015)50:5<513::AID-BIP5>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  67. 10.1105/tpc.105.031393 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.011 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.06.009 · DOI
  70. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016765 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/nsmb.1795 · DOI
  72. 10.1101/2023.08.31.555822 · DOI
  73. 10.1111/2041-210X.12628 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.013 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.037 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Mühlenbeck, H., Tsutsui, Y., Lemmon, M. A., Bender, K. W., & Zipfel, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Bender, Kyle W.
  • Zipfel, Cyril
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-08-25
OpenAlex
W4386168638
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • UK Research and Innovation (BB/S004734/1)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (182625)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S004734/1)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM122485)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
allosteric activation, LRR receptor kinase, conformational change, activation loop phosphorylation, plant immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review