PreprintCited by 22vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MHC-Fine: Fine-tuned AlphaFold for Precise MHC-Peptide Complex Prediction

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.05.011

Abstract

The precise prediction of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)-peptide complex structures is pivotal for understanding cellular immune responses and advancing vaccine design. In this study, we enhanced AlphaFold’s capabilities by fine-tuning it with a specialized dataset comprised by exclusively high-resolution MHC-peptide crystal structures. This tailored approach aimed to address the generalist nature of AlphaFold’s original training, which, while broad-ranging, lacked the granularity necessary for the high-precision demands of MHC-peptide interaction prediction. A comparative analysis was conducted against the homology-modeling-based method Pandora [13], as well as the AlphaFold multimer model [8]. Our results demonstrate that our fine-tuned model outperforms both in terms of RMSD (median value is 0.65 Å) but also provides enhanced predicted lDDT scores, offering a more reliable assessment of the predicted structures. These advances have substantial implications for computational immunology, potentially accelerating the development of novel therapeutics and vaccines by providing a more precise computational lens through which to view MHC-peptide interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.11.29.569310

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 2019, Ape-gen: A fast method for generating ensembles of bound peptide-mhc conformations, Molecules, 24, 881, 10.3390/molecules24050881 · DOI
  2. Gustaf Ahdritz , Nazim Bouatta , Sachin Kadyan , Qinghui Xia , William Gerecke , Tim O’Donnell , Daniel Berenberg , Ian Fisk , Niccoló Zanichelli , Bo Zhang , Arkadiusz Nowaczynski , Bei Wang , Marta M. Stepniewska-Dziubinska , Shang Zhang , Adegoke A. Ojewole , Murat Efe Guney , Stella Biderman , Andrew M. Watkins , Stephen Ra , Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo , Lucas Nivon , Brian D. Weitzner , Yih-En Andrew Ban , Peter K. Sorger , Emad Mostaque , Zhao Zhang , Richard Bonneau , and Mohammed Alquraishi . Openfold: Retraining alphafold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization. bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI
  3. 10.7554/eLife.82813 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.08.007 · DOI
  5. Richard Evans , Michael O’Neill , Alexander Pritzel , Natasha Antropova , Andrew Senior , Tim Green , Augustin Žídek , Russ Bates , Sam Blackwell , Jason Yim , and et al. Protein complex prediction with Alphafold-Multimer, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/bib/bbv005 · DOI
  7. Lenong Li , Xubiao Peng , Mansoor Batliwala , and Marlene Bouvier . Crystal structures of mhc class i complexes reveal the elusive intermediate conformations explored during peptide editing. Nature Communications, 14(1), 2023. · DOI
  8. 10.1146/annurev.iy.13.040195.003103 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dario F. Marzella , Farzaneh M. Parizi , Derek van Tilborg , Nicolas Renaud , Daan Sybrandi , Rafaella Buzatu , Daniel T. Rademaker , Peter A Chr‘T Hoen , and Li C. Xue . Pandora: A fast, anchor-restrained modelling protocol for peptide: Mhc complexes. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, 2022. · DOI
  11. Maurício Menegatti Rigo , Dinler Amaral Antunes , Martiela Vaz de Freitas , Marcus Fabiano de Almeida Mendes , Lindolfo Meira , Marialva Sinigaglia , and Gustavo Fioravanti Vieira . Docktope: A web-based tool for automated pmhc-i modelling. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 2015. · DOI
  12. V. V. Mikhaylov and Arnold J. Levine . Accurate modeling of peptide-mhc structures with alphafold. bioRxiv, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1084/jem.179.5.1613 · DOI
  14. Amir Motmaen , Justas Dauparas , Minkyung Baek , Mohamad Abedi , David Baker , and Philip Bradley . Peptide-binding specificity prediction using fine-tuned protein structure prediction networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120, 2022. · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.11.021 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nri3084 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/nature22991 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Adam Paszke , Sam Gross , Francisco Massa , Adam Lerer , James Bradbury , Gregory Chanan , Trevor Killeen , Zeming Lin , Natalia Gimelshein , Luca Antiga , Alban Desmaison , Andreas Kopf , Edward Yang , Zachary DeVito , Martin Raison , Alykhan Tejani , Sasank Chilamkurthy , Benoit Steiner , Lu Fang , Junjie Bai , and Soumith Chintala . Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  19. 2013, HLA Peptide Length Preferences Control CD8+ T Cell Responses, The Journal of Immunology, 191, 561, 10.4049/jimmunol.1300292 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/gkz950 · DOI
  21. Sietske Rosendahl Huber , Josine van Beek , JÃrgen de Jonge , Willem Luytjes , and Debbie van Baarle . T cell responses to viral infections - opportunities for peptide vaccination. Frontiers in Immunology, 5, 2014. · DOI
  22. 10.1038/ni1257 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Glukhov, E., Kalitin, D., Stepanenko, D., Zhu, Y., Nguyen, T., Jones, G., Simmerling, C., Mitchell, J. C., Vajda, S., Dill, K. A., Padhorny, D., & Kozakov, D.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Ukrainian Catholic University (UA)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Stony Brook School (US)
Corresponding author
  • Padhorny, Dzmitry
  • Kozakov, Dima
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-01
Volume
123
Issue
17
Pages
2902-2909
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396934049
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DEAC05- 00OR22725, 2054251, 1664644)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, 00OR22725)
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC05-00OR22725, RM1135136)
  • Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM140098, R35GM118078)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
MHC class I, Pandora, protein structure prediction, vaccine design, immunoinformatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review