The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Don’t put words in my mouth: Speech perception can generate False Positive activation of a speech BCI
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1186/s12984-025-01689-7
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated that speech can be decoded from brain activity and used for brain-computer interface (BCI)-based communication. It is however also known that the area often used as a signal source for speech decoding BCIs, the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), is also engaged when people perceive speech, thus making speech perception a potential source of false positive activation of the BCI. The current study investigated if and how speech perception may interfere with reliable speech BCI control. We recorded high-density electrocorticography (HD-ECoG) data from five subjects while they performed a speech perception and speech production task and trained a support-vector machine (SVM) on the produced speech data. Our results show that decoders that are highly reliable at detecting self-produced speech from brain signals also generate false positives during the perception of speech. We conclude that speech perception interferes with reliable BCI control, and that efforts to limit the occurrence of false positives during daily-life BCI use should be implemented in BCI design to increase the likelihood of successful adaptation by end users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have shown that the neural mechanisms of speech production and perception are connected and overlapping, even in motor areas.
“recent studies have shown that the neural mechanisms of speech production and perception are connected and overlapping, even in motor areas68–71.”
From Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80031-X · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.06.30.23291352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature11911 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.10.022 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.12577 · DOI
- Hayashi, H. , & Kato, S. (1989). Total manifestations of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ALS in the totally locked-in state. 17. · DOI
- 10.3389/fnins.2019.01267 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0112392 · DOI
- 10.1002/advs.202304853 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06443-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-33611-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/nejmoa2027540 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016862 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.020 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0509989103 · DOI
- 10.1080/23273798.2015.1101145 · DOI
- 10.1088/1741-2552/abb25e · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1608085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108307 · DOI
- 10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123880 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06377-x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses
Kunz, E. M., Abramovich Krasa, B., Kamdar, F., Avansino, D. T., Hahn, N., Yoon, S., Singh, A., Nason-Tomaszewski, S. R., Card, N. S., Jude, J. J., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.015 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Schippers, A., Vansteensel, M. J., Freudenburg, Z. V., & Ramsey, N. F.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Ramsey, N.F.
- Venue
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-01-22
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-181
- ISSN
- 1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10854295
- OpenAlex
- W4413307020
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (320708, 101070939)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (SGW-406-18-GO-086, 406.18.GO.086)
- National Institutes of Health
- European Research Council (ERC-Advanced ‘iConnect’ project, grant ADV 320708)
- Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen (UGT7685)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (U01DC016686)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UH3NS114439)
- HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council (101070939)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, speech perception, speech production, sensorimotor cortex, false positive activation, electrocorticography, speech decoding, support vector machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review