PreprintCited by 9EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesTactile and Sensory InteractionsGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Don’t put words in my mouth: Speech perception can generate False Positive activation of a speech BCI

Open access
Schippers, A., Vansteensel, M.J., Freudenburg, Z.V., Ramsey, N.F.·2024·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s12984-025-01689-7

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that speech can be decoded from brain activity and used for brain-computer interface (BCI)-based communication. It is however also known that the area often used as a signal source for speech decoding BCIs, the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), is also engaged when people perceive speech, thus making speech perception a potential source of false positive activation of the BCI. The current study investigated if and how speech perception may interfere with reliable speech BCI control. We recorded high-density electrocorticography (HD-ECoG) data from five subjects while they performed a speech perception and speech production task and trained a support-vector machine (SVM) on the produced speech data. Our results show that decoders that are highly reliable at detecting self-produced speech from brain signals also generate false positives during the perception of speech. We conclude that speech perception interferes with reliable BCI control, and that efforts to limit the occurrence of false positives during daily-life BCI use should be implemented in BCI design to increase the likelihood of successful adaptation by end users.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.01.21.23300437

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have shown that the neural mechanisms of speech production and perception are connected and overlapping, even in motor areas.

    “recent studies have shown that the neural mechanisms of speech production and perception are connected and overlapping, even in motor areas68–71.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80031-X · DOI
  2. 10.1101/2023.06.30.23291352 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nature11911 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.10.022 · DOI
  5. 10.7554/eLife.12577 · DOI
  6. Hayashi, H. , & Kato, S. (1989). Total manifestations of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ALS in the totally locked-in state. 17. · DOI
  7. 10.3389/fnins.2019.01267 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112392 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/advs.202304853 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/s41586-023-06443-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/s41467-022-33611-3 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1056/nejmoa2027540 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016862 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.020 · DOI
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0509989103 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/23273798.2015.1101145 · DOI
  17. 10.1088/1741-2552/abb25e · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.006 · DOI
  19. 10.1056/NEJMoa1608085 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108307 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123880 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41586-023-06377-x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schippers, A., Vansteensel, M. J., Freudenburg, Z. V., & Ramsey, N. F.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, N.F.
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-01-22
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
181-181
ISSN
1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413307020
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (320708, 101070939)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (SGW-406-18-GO-086, 406.18.GO.086)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • European Research Council (ERC-Advanced ‘iConnect’ project, grant ADV 320708)
  • Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen (UGT7685)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (U01DC016686)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UH3NS114439)
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council (101070939)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
brain-computer interface, speech perception, speech production, sensorimotor cortex, false positive activation, electrocorticography, speech decoding, support vector machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review