Cited by 686Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchMotor Control and Adaptation

Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation

Open access
Bouchard, Kristofer E., Mesgarani, Nima, Johnson, Keith, Chang, Edward F.·2013·Nature

Abstract

Speaking is one of the most complex actions that we perform, but nearly all of us learn to do it effortlessly. Production of fluent speech requires the precise, coordinated movement of multiple articulators (for example, the lips, jaw, tongue and larynx) over rapid time scales. Here we used high-resolution, multi-electrode cortical recordings during the production of consonant-vowel syllables to determine the organization of speech sensorimotor cortex in humans. We found speech-articulator representations that are arranged somatotopically on ventral pre- and post-central gyri, and that partially overlap at individual electrodes. These representations were coordinated temporally as sequences during syllable production. Spatial patterns of cortical activity showed an emergent, population-level representation, which was organized by phonetic features. Over tens of milliseconds, the spatial patterns transitioned between distinct representations for different consonants and vowels. These results reveal the dynamic organization of speech sensorimotor cortex during the generation of multi-articulator movements that underlies our ability to speak.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11911

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animating a facial avatar to accompany synthesized speech is a promising route to naturalistic communication and may be achievable by decoding articulatory and orofacial representations in speech-motor cortex.

    “Therefore, animation of a facial avatar to accompany synthesized speech and further embody the user is a promising means towards naturalistic communication, and it may be possible via decoding of articulatory and orofacial representations in the speech-motor cortex22–25.”

    From A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page unavailable) report articulator and orofacial representations in ventral sensorimotor cortex during speech, supporting the proposed neural target. The paper does not report decoding those representations to animate a facial avatar or establish that this application is feasible; that remains the citing authors’ proposal. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neural populations in vSMC and midPrCG control millisecond-level movements of vocal-tract articulators that give rise to speech sounds.

    “Neural populations in the ventral sensorimotor cortex (vSMC) and the middle precentral gyrus (midPrCG) control the millisecond-level movements of the vocal-tract articulators (lips, tongue, jaw and larynx) that give rise to speech sounds17,18 (Fig. 2a).”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Abstract and Discussion describe vSMC representations of vocal-tract articulators and their coordination in producing speech sounds. The Timing of Articulator Representations section places articulator movements on a scale of tens of milliseconds. The paper does not identify the middle precentral gyrus (midPrCG) as a separate region controlling those movements; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The high-γ band of the local field potential (70-150 Hz) correlates with neuronal firing rates underneath each ECoG electrode and captures cortical representations of acoustic and articulatory features relevant to speech.

    “The high-γ band of the local field potential (70–150 Hz) correlates with neuronal firing rates underneath each ECoG electrode86,87 and captures cortical representations of acoustic and articulatory features relevant to speech17,88,89 (Fig. 1; Crone et al. 1998, 2001).”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The paper’s ‘Phonetic Organization of Spatial Patterns’ section links cortical activity to articulators and vowel states, supporting the articulatory part of the claim. Its ‘vSMC Physiology During Syllable Production’ section also says high-gamma activity correlates with multi-unit firing rates, but specifies 85–175 Hz rather than 70–150 Hz. The cited passages do not establish that this paper found cortical representations of acoustic features; its acoustic analysis describes the recorded speech sounds. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple studies have demonstrated that isolated phonemes can be decoded from neural activity.

    “Multiple studies have demonstrated that isolated phonemes can be decoded from neural activity17,106,107,118 (Fig. 1; Mugler et al. 2014 and Herff et al. 2015).”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The ‘Phonetic Organization of Spatial Patterns’ section reports distinct neural activity patterns for consonant articulator groups and for three vowels. However, the Methods describe participants producing consonant–vowel syllables, and the reported analysis clusters neural patterns rather than demonstrating decoding of isolated phonemes. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous work using electrocorticographic grids has suggested that there may be a broader somatotopic organization along precentral gyrus.

    “Although previous work using electrocorticographic grids has suggested that there may be a broader somatotopic organization19 along precentral gyrus”

    From A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods (Subjects and Experimental Task; page not provided) describe subdural ECoG arrays, and the Spatial Representation of Articulators section reports a dorsal–ventral somatotopic arrangement. The finding is limited to speech articulators in ventral sensorimotor cortex, including the ventral precentral gyrus; it does not establish a broader organization along the precentral gyrus as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Fowler CA Rubin PE Remez RE Turvey MT Language Production 1 Speech and Talk Butterworth B 373 420 Academic Press 1980
  2. [45]Jakobson R Fant G Halle M Preliminaries to speech analysis: the distinctive features and their correlates M.I.T. Press 1969
  3. [48]Mesgarani N Chang EF 2012 Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception Nature 485 233 236 22522927 PMC3870007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouchard, K. E., Mesgarani, N., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Edward F.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
495
Issue
7441
Pages
327-332
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2138672527
Cited by
686
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 1
FWCI
25.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-05-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP2-OD00862, 1dp2od008627-01, 5r00ns065120-04)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC012379)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (L30 NS060463, R00-NS065120)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
speech articulation, sensorimotor cortex, somatotopic representation, phonetic features, consonant-vowel syllables, population coding, ventral premotor cortex, speech production
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Phonetics, Speech, Time Factors, Principal Component Analysis, Electromagnetic Phenomena, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review