PreprintCited by 6Protein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Elaboration of the Homer1 Recognition Landscape Reveals Incomplete Divergence of Paralogous EVH1 Domains

Open access
Singer, Avinoam, Ramos, Alejandra, Keating, Amy E.·2024·Protein Science

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.5094 · Paper page

Abstract

Short sequences that mediate interactions with modular binding domains are ubiquitous throughout eukaryotic proteomes. Networks of Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) and their corresponding binding domains orchestrate many cellular processes, and the low mutational barrier to evolving novel interactions provides a way for biological systems to rapidly sample selectable phenotypes. Mapping SLiM binding specificity and the rules that govern SLiM evolution is fundamental to uncovering the pathways regulated by these networks and developing the tools to manipulate them. We used high-throughput screening of the human proteome to identify sequences that bind to the Enabled/VASP homology 1 (EVH1) domain of the postsynaptic density scaffolding protein Homer1. In doing so, we expanded current understanding of the determinants of Homer EVH1 binding preferences and defined a new motif that can facilitate the discovery of additional Homer-mediated interactions. Interestingly, the Homer1 EVH1 domain preferentially binds to sequences containing an N-terminally overlapping motif that is bound by the paralogous family of Ena/VASP actin polymerases, and many of these sequences can bind to EVH1 domains from both protein families. We provide evidence from orthologous EVH1 domains in pre-metazoan organisms that the overlap in human Ena/VASP and Homer binding preferences corresponds to an incomplete divergence from a common Ena/VASP ancestor. Given this overlap in binding profiles, promiscuous sequences that can be recognized by both families either achieve specificity through extrinsic regulatory strategies or may provide functional benefits via multi-specificity. This may explain why these paralogs incompletely diverged despite the accessibility of further diverged isoforms. Impact Statement: Short linear motifs bind to structurally conserved domains to mediate many protein interactions. Current definitions of motifs, using regular expressions, are over simplified and do not capture what is required for binding. Unbiased proteome interaction screens can refine these definitions. For EVH1 domains considered in this work, screening elucidated Homer1 binding requirements and revealed a residual overlap of specificity of two anciently diverged families, highlighting both opportunities and challenges of multi-specificity in domain-motif interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.01.23.576863

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142710 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrm3920 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/cr400585q · DOI
  5. 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00110 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/pro.2881 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020048 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1186/s12964-015-0120-z · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nrg2482 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1039/c1mb05231d · DOI
  11. 10.2741/3281 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.029 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.95.2.606 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/molbev/msu178 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1242/jcs.259226 · DOI
  16. 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23549 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00546-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1242/jcs.038125 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/13040 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81092-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7956 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.05.007 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r183 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80589-9 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80810-7 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80588-7 · DOI
  27. 10.1159/000500267 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/386284a0 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.str.2018.10.011 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1151227 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/nar/gkr1064 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5433 · DOI
  33. 10.7554/eLife.73178 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00618 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81145-9 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80757-6 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/febs.13995 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nbt.1856 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/protein/gzn020 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41419-018-0376-5 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2012.01337.x · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nmeth.2646 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41586-020-2188-x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
  45. 10.1074/jbc.M209107200 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2022.151200 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.08.003 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41598-022-07179-3 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.07.008 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nn1134 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00716-5 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/bfgp/elr010 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.079 · DOI
  55. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4640 · DOI
  56. 2007, Evolution of Protein-Protein Interaction Network Protein-Protein Interaction Network as a Typical Example of Biological Networks. Genome Dyn Basel, Karger, 3, 13
  57. 10.1126/science.1068696 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/molbev/msi072 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Fraser HB , Wall DP , Hirsh AE. A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions. 2003;6:6–11. · DOI
  60. 10.1039/c4mb00290c · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.075 · DOI
  62. 10.1073/pnas · DOI
  63. 10.1038/s41586-019-1639-8 · DOI
  64. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020094 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03307-5 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/nature02178 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.03.004 · DOI
  68. 10.1126/scisignal.2004088.Integrative · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.086 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.001 · DOI
  71. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034677 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00339-7 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1038/s41380-020-00991-1 · DOI
  75. 10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1197 · DOI
  76. 10.1074/jbc.M709435200 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06139.x · DOI
  78. 10.1093/nar/gkr1122 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/ijc.29234 · DOI
  80. 10.1038/cddis.2013.99 · DOI
  81. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179159 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
  83. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz921 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168001 · DOI
  85. 10.1101/pdb.prot4566 · DOI
  86. 10.1201/9781420005615.ax4 · DOI
  87. 10.1093/nar/gkj109 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1038/ng.2653 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1093/nar/gkx238 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Singer, A., Ramos, A., & Keating, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT (US)
Corresponding author
Keating, Amy E.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-01-23
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
e5094-e5094
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400554353
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA014051, P30-CA-14051)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007287, R01GM129007, R35GM149227)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
Homer1, EVH1 domain, short linear motifs, protein-protein interaction, binding specificity, paralog divergence, promiscuous binding, actin cytoskeleton regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review