Cited by 217Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

A WAVE-1 and WRP Signaling Complex Regulates Spine Density, Synaptic Plasticity, and Memory

Open access
Soderling, Scott H., Guire, Eric S., Kaech, Stefanie, White, Jon, Zhang, Fang, Schutz, Kevin, Langeberg, Lorene K., Banker, Gary +2 more·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The scaffolding protein WAVE-1 (Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 1) directs signals from the GTPase Rac through the Arp2/3 complex to facilitate neuronal actin remodeling. The WAVE-associated GTPase activating protein called WRP is implicated in human mental retardation, and WAVE-1 knock-out mice have altered behavior. Neuronal time-lapse imaging, behavioral analyses, and electrophysiological recordings from genetically modified mice were used to show that WAVE-1 signaling complexes control aspects of neuronal morphogenesis and synaptic plasticity. Gene targeting experiments in mice demonstrate that WRP anchoring to WAVE-1 is a homeostatic mechanism that contributes to neuronal development and the fidelity of synaptic connectivity. This implies that signaling through WAVE-1 complexes is essential for neural plasticity and cognitive behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3209-06.2006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic ablation of WRC components affects spine morphology and excitability.

    “Rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton strongly influence the formation, retraction, motility, stability, and shape of the dendritic spines (Tada and Sheng, 2006), and genetic ablation of WRC components affects spine morphology and excitability (Grove et al., 2004, Kim et al., 2006, Soderling et al., 2007, Wiens et al., 2005).”

    From CYFIP1 Coordinates mRNA Translation and Cytoskeleton Remodeling to Ensure Proper Dendritic Spine Formation (2013) · cites this paper as Soderling et al., 2007

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports reduced spine density in WAVE-1 knock-out mice. The section “Loss of WAVE-1 alters synaptic plasticity” (page unavailable) reports altered synaptic transmission and plasticity, including reduced maximal fEPSPs, but does not establish a change in neuronal excitability specifically. The paper therefore supports the spine finding and a related functional change, not the full claim as phrased. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • WAVE1 deletion decreases the density and alters the morphology of dendritic spines.

    “WAVE1 deletion decreases the density and alters the morphology of dendritic spines22,61.”

    From The WAVE complex in developmental and adulthood brain disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    In “WAVE-1 plays a role in the development of dendritic spines,” WAVE-1-null mice have reduced spine density in the hippocampus and cortex. The spine-shape change reported in “Characterization of mWAVE-1 mice” was observed in neurons transfected with a dominant-interfering WAVE-1 mutant, not in the deletion mice; the source therefore does not establish that deletion alters spine morphology. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several genes involved in synaptic plasticity, synaptic transmission, and long-term potentiation (Gria1, Grin2b, Wasf1) showed low expression in WT, ApoeCh, and PS19, but were upregulated in PS19;ApoeCh.

    “There were also several genes (i.e., Gria1, Grin2b, Wasf1), involved in synaptic plasticity, synaptic transmission, and long-term potentiation that showed low expression in WT, ApoeCh, and PS19, but which were upregulated in PS19;ApoeCh (Fig. 8c) [70–73].”
  • The observed spine dysmorphogenesis is in line with defects in WRC components, loss of FMRP, overexpression of ARC, or Rac1 blockade during early development.

    “the observed spine dysmorphogenesis is in line with defects in the WRC components (Grove et al., 2004, Kim et al., 2006, Soderling et al., 2007), loss of FMRP (Comery et al., 1997, Cruz-Martín et al., 2010, Galvez and Greenough, 2005, Irwin et al., 2002), overexpression of ARC (Peebles et al., 2010), or Rac1 blockade during early development (Tashiro and Yuste, 2004).”
  • WAVE1 also regulates growth cone dynamics and neurite outgrowth in cultured neurons.

    “WAVE1 also regulates growth cone dynamics and neurite outgrowth in cultured neurons61 (Fig. 4a).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Banker GA (1998) Culturing nerve cells, Ed 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  2. Ramon-Moliner E (1970) The Golgi-Cox technique. New York: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soderling, S. H., Guire, E. S., Kaech, S., White, J., Zhang, F., Schutz, K., Langeberg, L. K., Banker, G., Raber, J., & Scott, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Oregon National Primate Research Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-01-10
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
355-365
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1973155317
Cited by
217
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AG-NS-0201, DK44239)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG020904, AG20904)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P01DK044239, DK44239)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS027037, NS 17112, R01NS017112, NS 27037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
Arp2/3 complex, Rac GTPase, actin cytoskeleton remodeling, dendritic spine density, synaptic plasticity, memory, neuronal morphogenesis, synaptic connectivity, cognitive behavior
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Homeostasis, Humans, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Molecular Sequence Data, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Signal Transduction, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Knockout, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Dendritic Spines, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein Family, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review