PreprintCited by 1Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Likelihood-based interactive local docking into cryo-EM maps in ChimeraX

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1107/s2059798324006776

Abstract

The interpretation of cryo-EM maps often includes the docking of known or predicted structures of the components, which is particularly useful when the map resolution is worse than 4 Å. Although it can be effective to search the entire map to find the best placement of a component, the process can be slow when the maps are large. However, frequently there is a well-founded hypothesis about where particular components are located. In such cases, a local search using a map subvolume will be much faster because the search volume is smaller, and more sensitive because optimizing the search volume for the rotation search step enhances signal-to-noise. A Fourier-space likelihood-based local search approach, based on the previously-published em_placement software, has been implemented in the new emplace_local program. Tests confirm that the local search approach enhances speed and sensitivity of the computations. An interactive graphical interface in the ChimeraX molecular graphics program provides a convenient way to set up and evaluate docking calculations, particularly in defining the part of the map into which the components should be placed. Synopsis: Likelihood-based cryo-EM docking using our emplace_local software is faster and more sensitive than our related software, em_placement , when the approximate location of a component is known, and is available conveniently through a plugin to the ChimeraX visualization software.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.16.594509

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature11871 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/nar/gkl971 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nature14013 · DOI
  5. 2017, Acta Cryst D, 73, 469, 10.1107/S2059798317007859 · DOI
  6. 2018, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology, 74, 519, 10.1107/S2059798318002425 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature10330 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.030 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1042/BCJ20210708 · DOI
  11. 10.7554/elife.68710 · DOI
  12. 2014, Nat Methods, 11, 63, 10.1038/nmeth.2727 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/nar/gkv1126 · DOI
  14. 10.1107/s2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1074/jbc.M110.112284 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.1701640114 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/PRO.4792 · DOI
  18. 2023, Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol, 79, 281
  19. 10.1038/S41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s41586-020-2829-0 · DOI
  21. 2022, Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol, 78, 1303, 10.1107/S2059798322010026 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/PRO.3943 · DOI
  23. 2023, Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol, 79, 271

Metadata

Authors
Read, R. J., Pettersen, E. F., McCoy, A. J., Croll, T. I., Terwilliger, T. C., Poon, B. K., Meng, E. C., Liebschner, D., & Adams, P. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Altos Labs (US)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Read, Randy J.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-16
OpenAlex
W4396945979
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review