PreprintCited by 18Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context

Open access
Martinez-Corral, Rosa, Friedrich, Dhana, Frömel, Robert, Velten, Lars, Gunawardena, Jeremy, DePace, Angela H.·2024·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2413715122

Abstract

For decades, studies have noted that transcription factors (TFs) can behave as either activators or repressors of different target genes. More recently, evidence suggests TFs can act on transcription simultaneously in positive and negative ways. Here we use biophysical models of gene regulation to define, conceptualize and explore these two aspects of TF action: “duality”, where TFs can be overall both activators and repressors at the level of the transcriptional response, and “coherent and incoherent” modes of regulation, where TFs act mechanistically on a given target gene either as an activator or a repressor (coherent) or as both (incoherent). For incoherent TFs, the overall response depends on three kinds of features: the TF’s mechanistic effects, the dynamics and effects of additional regulatory molecules or the transcriptional machinery, and the occupancy of the TF on DNA. Therefore, activation or repression can be tuned by just the TF-DNA binding affinity, or the number of TF binding sites, given an otherwise fixed molecular context. Moreover, incoherent TFs can cause non-monotonic transcriptional responses, increasing over a certain concentration range and decreasing outside the range, and we clarify the relationship between non-monotonicity and common assumptions of gene regulation models. Using the mammalian SP1 as a case study and well controlled, synthetically designed target sequences, we find experimental evidence for incoherent action and activation, repression or non-monotonicity tuned by affinity. Our work highlights the importance of moving from a TF-centric view to a systems view when reasoning about transcriptional control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.29.596388

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These observations can quantitatively be explained by a biophysical model where a TF activates a rate-limiting step in transcriptional activation and represses other steps, such that a second step becomes rate limiting once a certain TF occupancy is exceeded.

    “These observations can quantitatively be explained by a biophysical model46 where a TF activates a rate-limiting step in transcriptional activation and represses other steps, such that a second step becomes rate limiting once a certain TF occupancy is exceeded (Figures 3H and 3I; see STAR Methods, section biophysical models).”

    From Design principles of cell-state-specific enhancers in hematopoiesis (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Under common biophysical assumptions, increases in motif number and affinity lead to higher TF occupancy.

    “Under common biophysical assumptions, increases in these two quantities lead to higher TF occupancy.46,47”
  • Non-monotonous effects of a transcription factor with respect to binding site affinity can arise when gene regulation is limited at multiple steps and the transcription factor acts incoherently on those steps, promoting transcription at some steps and hindering it at others.

    “In that work, we show that non-monotonous effects of a TF with respect to binding site affinity can arise when gene regulation is limited at multiple steps, and a TF acts incoherently on those steps, such that it acts on one or more steps to promote transcription, and on other steps to hinder it.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [36]Mahdavi Sara “ Flexibility and sensitivity in gene regulation out of equilibrium”. en. In: bioRxiv (2023), p. 2023.04.11.536490. PMC11573582 39499638
  2. [58]Pya Natalya and Wood Simon N. “ Shape constrained additive models”. In: Stat. Comput. 25. 3 (2015), pp. 543– 559.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez-Corral, R., Friedrich, D., Frömel, R., Velten, L., Gunawardena, J., & DePace, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Martinez-Corral, Rosa
  • DePace, Angela H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-06-02
Volume
122
Issue
39
Pages
e2413715122-e2413715122
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414384778
Cited by
18
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1715184, CAREER, 1452557)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF683-2019)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PID2019‐108082GA‐I00, PID2022-142210NA-I00, PID2019, CEX2020-001049-S MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033, RYC2021-033860-I, .13039/501100011033, 501100011033)
  • Centres de Recerca de Catalunya (501100011033)
  • European Commission (13039/501100011033, 501100011033)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (501100011033, PID2019)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN/AEI/10, .13039/501100011033, RYC2021-033860-I, / AEI/10, PID2019, 501100011033, CEX2020-001049-S, RYC2021, PID2022)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (501100011033, 13039, .13039/501100011033, AEI/10, PID2019)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM122928)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Sp1, transcriptional regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review