The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure-guided engineering of type I-F CASTs for targeted gene insertion in human cells
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-63164-0
Abstract
Conventional genome editing tools rely on DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and host recombination proteins to achieve large insertions, resulting in a heterogeneous mixture of undesirable editing outcomes. We recently leveraged a type I-F CRISPR-associated transposase (CAST) from the Pseudoalteromonas Tn 7016 transposon ( Pse CAST) for DSB-free, RNA-guided DNA integration in human cells, taking advantage of its programmability and large payload capacity. Pse CAST is the only characterized CAST system that has achieved human genomic DNA insertions, but multiple lines of evidence suggest that DNA binding may be a critical bottleneck that limits high-efficiency activity. Here we report structural determinants of target DNA recognition by the Pse CAST QCascade complex using single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM), which revealed novel subtype-specific interactions and RNA-DNA heteroduplex features. By combining our structural data with target DNA library screens and rationally engineered protein mutations, we uncovered CAST variants that exhibit increased integration efficiency and modified PAM stringency. Structure predictions of key interfaces in the transpososome holoenzyme also revealed opportunities for the design of hybrid CASTs, which we leveraged to build chimeric systems that combine high-activity DNA binding and DNA integration modules. Collectively, our work provides unique structural insights into type I-F CAST systems while showcasing multiple diverse strategies to investigate and engineer new RNA-guided transposase architectures for human genome editing applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- 10.1038/nrm2351 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Modulating DNA Repair Pathways to Improve Precision Genome Engineering, ACS Chem. Biol, 13, 389, 10.1021/acschembio.7b00777 · DOI
- 10.7554/elife.51539 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0380-z · DOI · Paper page
- Kosicki, M. , Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A . Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR– Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing, Nat. Genet, 53, 895, 10.1038/s41588-021-00838-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Frequent aneuploidy in primary human T cells after CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage, Nat. Biotechnol, 40, 1807, 10.1038/s41587-022-01377-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/J.CELL.2023.08.041 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature17946 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3803 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature24644 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1323-z · DOI
- 2019, RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases, Science, 364, 48
- 2023, Targeted DNA integration in human cells without double-strand breaks using CRISPR-associated transposases, Nat. Biotechnol, 42, 87
- 2021, Dual modes of CRISPR-associated transposon homing, Cell, 184, 2441, 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.006 · DOI
- 2023, Discovery and characterization of novel type I-D CRISPR-guided transposons identified among diverse Tn7-like elements in cyanobacteria, 51, 765
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1849-0 · DOI
- 2023, Molecular mechanism for Tn7-like transposon recruitment by a type I-B CRISPR effector, Cell, 186, 4204, 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.010 · DOI
- 2023, Multiple adaptations underly co-option of a CRISPR surveillance complex for RNA-guided DNA transposition, Mol. Cell, 83, 1827, 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.05.005 · DOI
- 2019, CRISPR–Cas in mobile genetic elements: counter-defence and beyond, Nat. Rev. Microbiol, 17, 513, 10.1038/s41579-019-0204-7 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13100-021-00236-0 · DOI
- 2022, Structural basis for the assembly of the type V CRISPR-associated transposon complex, Cell, 185, 4999, 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.021 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac985 · DOI
- Rybarski, J. R. , Hu, K. , Hill, A. M. , Wilke, C. O. & Finkelstein, I. J . Metagenomic discovery of CRISPR-associated transposons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, (2021). · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.005 · DOI
- 2023, Novel molecular requirements for CRISPR RNA-guided transposition, Nucleic Acids Res, 51, 4519, 10.1093/nar/gkad270 · DOI
- 2021, CRISPR RNA-guided integrases for high-efficiency, multiplexed bacterial genome engineering, Nat. Biotechnol, 39, 480, 10.1038/s41587-020-00745-y · DOI
- 2022, Species- and site-specific genome editing in complex bacterial communities, Nat. Microbiol, 7, 34
- George, J. T. et al. Mechanism of target site selection by type V-K CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 382, (2023). · DOI
- 2020, Response to Comment on “RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases”, Science, 368, 1
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01574-x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abi8976 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2110877119 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-04030-z · DOI
- 2023, Structures of the holo CRISPR RNA-guided transposon integration complex, Nature, 613, 775, 10.1038/s41586-022-05573-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05059-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41422-019-0272-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41422-020-0274-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41422-019-0268-y · DOI
- 2021, CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks, Nat. Methods, 18, 176, 10.1038/s41592-020-01049-4 · DOI
- 2020, CRISPR-Cas ‘non-Target’ Sites Inhibit On-Target Cutting Rates, CRISPR J, 3, 550, 10.1089/crispr.2020.0065 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12915-020-00857-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.012 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh271 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1011428107 · DOI
- 2020, The attachment of a DNA-binding Sso7d-like protein improves processivity and resistance to inhibitors of M-MuLV reverse transcriptase, FEBS Lett, 594, 4338, 10.1002/1873-3468.13934 · DOI
- 2022, Nature-inspired engineering of an artificial ligase enzyme by domain fusion, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, 11175, 10.1093/nar/gkac858 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1256328 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.110 · DOI
- Aldag, P. et al. Dynamic interplay between target search and recognition for a Type I CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Commun. 14, (2023). · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/emboj/cdf347 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07215-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/srep37274 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.14.2643 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lampe, G. D., Liang, A. R., Zhang, D. J., Fernández, I. S., & Sternberg, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Ikerbasque (ES)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fernández, Israel S.
- Sternberg, Samuel H.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-09-19
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7891-7891
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12375015
- OpenAlex
- W4413473455
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DP2HG011650)
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
- National Institutes of Health
- Irving Medical Center, Columbia University
- National Human Genome Research Institute (DP2HG011650, RM1HG009490)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U24GM129539)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI168976)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB031935, R01EB027793)
- Common Fund (U24 GM129539)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- CRISPR-associated transposases, CAST, type I-F CRISPR-Cas, RNA-DNA heteroduplex, PAM recognition, structure-guided engineering, human genome editing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review