PreprintCited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving diffusion-based protein backbone generation with global-geometry-aware latent encoding

Open access
Zhang, Yuyang, Liu, Yuhang, Ma, Zinnia, Li, Min, Xu, Chunfu, Gong, Haipeng·2024·Nature Machine Intelligence

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42256-025-01059-x

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs in diffusion-based generative models have prompted de novo protein design, notably in generating diverse and realistic structures. Nevertheless, while existing models either excel at unconditional generation or employ residue-wise conditioning for topological control, explorations on a holistic, top-down approach to control the overall topological arrangements is still limited. In response, we introduce TopoDiff, a diffusion-based framework augmented by a structure encoder and a latent sampler. Our model can unsupervisedly learn a compact latent representation of protein global geometry, while simultaneously integrating a diffusion module to leverage this information for controlled structure generation. In benchmark against existing models, TopoDiff demonstrates comparable performance on established metrics and exhibits an improved coverage over the fold modes of natural proteins. Moreover, our method enables versatile control at the global-geometry level for structural generation, under the assistance of which we derived a number of novel folds of mainly-beta proteins with comprehensive experimental validation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.10.05.616664

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 10.1038/nature23912 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41586-018-0830-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2023, De novo design of highly selective miniprotein inhibitors of integrins αvβ6 and αvβ8, Nature Communications, 14, 5660, 10.1038/s41467-023-41272-z · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41586-023-05696-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41586-019-1432-8 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.aay2790 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100558 · DOI
  8. Wu, K. E. , Yang, K. K. , Berg, R. v. d. , et al. Protein structure generation via folding diffusion en. arXiv:2209.15611 [cs, q-bio]. 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.15611 (2023). · arXiv
  9. 10.1016/j.chempr.2023.03.020 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s43588-023-00440-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Baek, M. , Anishchenko, I. , Humphreys, I. R. , et al. Efficient and accurate prediction of protein structure using RoseTTAFold2 en. Pages: 2023.05.24.542179 Section: New Results. 2023. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.24.542179v1 (2023). · DOI
  12. Anand, N. & Achim, T. Protein Structure and Sequence Generation with Equivariant Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models en. arXiv:2205.15019 [cs, q-bio]. 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15019 (2023). · arXiv
  13. Luo, S. , Su, Y. , Peng, X. , et al. Antigen-Specific Antibody Design and Optimization with Diffusion-Based Generative Models for Protein Structures en. preprint (Bioinformatics, 2022). http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.07.10.499510 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Yim, J. , Trippe, B. L. , De Bortoli, V. , et al. SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation en. arXiv:2302.02277 [cs, q-bio, stat]. 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02277 (2023). · arXiv
  15. Lin, Y. & AlQuraishi, M. Generating Novel, Designable, and Diverse Protein Structures by Equivariantly Diffusing Oriented Residue Clouds en. arXiv:2301.12485 [cs, q-bio]. 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12485 (2023). · arXiv
  16. 2023, De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature, 620, 1089, 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8 · DOI
  19. 2021, CATH: increased structural coverage of functional space, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D266, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Bennett, N. R. , Watson, J. L. , Ragotte, R. J. , et al. Atomically accurate de novo design of single-domain antibodies en. 2024. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2024.03.14.585103 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ingraham, J. B. , Baranov, M. , Costello, Z. , et al., Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. Nature, 1–9, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.04.009 · DOI
  23. 2009, Cross-Over between Discrete and Continuous Protein Structure Space: Insights into Automatic Classification and Networks of Protein Structures, PLOS Computational Biology, 5, e1000331, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000331 · DOI
  24. 1998, Protein folds and functions, Structure, 6, 875, 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00089-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2661 · DOI
  26. 2003, Prediction of folding rates and transition-state placement from native-state geometry, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 51, 74, 10.1002/prot.10342 · DOI
  27. 2022, The protein folding rate and the geometry and topology of the native state, Scientific Reports, 12, 6384, 10.1038/s41598-022-09924-0 · DOI
  28. Luo, C. Understanding Diffusion Models: A Unified Perspective arXiv:2208.11970 [cs]. 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11970 (2023). · arXiv
  29. 2008, Visualizing Data using t-SNE, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2579
  30. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0159 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/nar/25.1.236 · DOI
  32. 2014, ECOD: An Evolutionary Classification of Protein Domains, PLoS Computational Biology, 10, e1003926, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003926 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 2009, Systematic comparison of SCOP and CATH: a new gold standard for protein structure analysis, BMC Structural Biology, 9, 23, 10.1186/1472-6807-9-23 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/pro.3742 · DOI
  35. 2003, A consensus view of fold space: Combining SCOP, CATH, and the Dali Domain Dictionary. Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society, 12, 2150
  36. 2021, Completeness and Consistency in Structural Domain Classifications, ACS Omega, 6, 15698, 10.1021/acsomega.1c00950 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.0907683106 · DOI
  38. 2016, Impact of structure space continuity on protein fold classification, Scientific Reports, 6, 23263, 10.1038/srep23263 · DOI
  39. Kynkäänniemi, T. , Karras, T. , Laine, S. , et al. Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Models en. arXiv:1904.06991 [cs, stat]. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06991 (2023). · arXiv
  40. 10.1038/s41587-024-02133-2 · DOI
  41. 10.1126/sci-ence.adl2528 · DOI
  42. Naeem, M. F. , Oh, S. J. , Uh, Y. , et al. Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models en. arXiv:2002.09797 [cs, stat]. 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09797 (2023). · arXiv
  43. 2004, Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 57, 702, 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Greener, J. G. & Jamali, K. Fast protein structure searching using structure graph embeddings en. Pages: 2022.11.28.518224 Section: New Results. 2024. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.28.518224v2 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
  45. 2018, Essentials of de novo protein design: Methods and applications, WIREs Computational Molecular Science, 8, e1374, 10.1002/wcms.1374 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41586-018-0509-0 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 2018, De novo design of a non-local β-sheet protein with high stability and accuracy, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 25, 1028, 10.1038/s41594-018-0141-6 · DOI
  48. 10.1126/science.abc8182 · DOI
  49. 2022, De novo design of immunoglobulin-like domains, Nature Communications, 13, 5661, 10.1038/s41467-022-33004-6 · DOI
  50. 10.1073/pnas.2207974120 · DOI
  51. 2024, Validation of de novo designed water-soluble and transmembrane β-barrels by in silico folding and melting, Protein Science, 33, e5033, 10.1002/pro.5033 · DOI
  52. Elazar, A. , Chandler, N. J. , Davey, A. S. , et al. De novo designed transmembrane domains tune engineered receptor functions en. preprint (Synthetic Biology, 2020). http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2020.07.26.221598 (2023). · DOI
  53. Balusek, C. , Hwang, H. , Hazel, A. , et al., Diverse Protein-Folding Pathways and Functions of β-Hairpins and β-Sheets. Quantitative Models for Microscopic to Macroscopic Biological Macromolecules and Tissues 1–20, 2018. · DOI
  54. Harihar, B. , Saravanan, K. M. , Gromiha, M. M. , et al., Importance of Inter-residue Contacts for Understanding Protein Folding and Unfolding Rates, Remote Homology, and Drug Design. Molecular Biotechnology, 2024. · DOI
  55. 2023, Improving de novo protein binder design with deep learning, Nature Communications, 14, 2625, 10.1038/s41467-023-38328-5 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 2021, AlphaFold and the amyloid landscape, Journal of Molecular Biology, 433, 167059, 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167059 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 2023, Protein folds vs. protein folding: Differing questions, different challenges, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120, e2214423119, 10.1073/pnas.2214423119 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/29.1.55 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.05.009 · DOI
  60. 2018, Design of metalloproteins and novel protein folds using variational autoencoders, Scientific Reports, 8, 16189, 10.1038/s41598-018-34533-1 · DOI
  61. 2021, Generating functional protein variants with variational autoencoders, PLOS Computational Biology, 17, e1008736, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008736 · DOI
  62. 2021, Generating tertiary protein structures via interpretable graph variational autoencoders, Bioinformatics Advances, 1, vbab036, 10.1093/bioadv/vbab036 · DOI
  63. 2022, Ig-VAE: Generative modeling of protein structure by direct 3D coordinate generation, PLOS Computational Biology, 18, e1010271, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010271 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Lai, B. , McPartlon, M. & Xu, J. End-to-End deep structure generative model for protein design en. preprint (Bioinformatics, 2022). http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.07.09.499440 (2023). · DOI
  65. 2024, openTSNE: A Modular Python Library for t-SNE Dimensionality Reduction and Embedding, Journal of Statistical Software, 109, 1
  66. Scott, D. W. Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization 1st ed. en. ISBN: 9780471547709 9780470316849.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470316849 (2024) (Wiley, 1992). · DOI
  67. 2020, SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 2021, POT: Python Optimal Transport, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22, 1
  69. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 2023, Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XV, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 91, 1539, 10.1002/prot.26617 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Greener, J. G. & Jamali, K. Fast protein structure searching using structure graph embeddings en. preprint (Bioinformatics, 2022). http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.11.28.518224 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Van Kempen, M. , Kim, S. S. , Tumescheit, C. , et al., Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek. Nature Biotechnology, 2023. · DOI · Paper page
  75. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. , Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods in Enzymology 307–326, 1997. · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1002/PRO.4792 · DOI
  79. 2015, Amino Acid Distribution Rules Predict Protein Fold: Protein Grammar for Beta-Strand Sandwich-Like Structures, Biomolecules, 5, 41, 10.3390/biom5010041 · DOI
  80. 10.1073/pnas.212511499 · DOI
  81. 2022, De novo design of immunoglobulin-like domains, Nature Communications, 13, 5661, 10.1038/s41467-022-33004-6 · DOI
  82. 10.1073/pnas.0510747103 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, Z., Li, M., Xu, C., & Gong, H.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing (CN)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-10-05
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
1104-1118
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411428671
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171243)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2023YFF1204400)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein structure generation, diffusion models, variational autoencoder, latent space encoding, global geometry, beta proteins, generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review