PreprintCited by 1Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data-driven evaluation of suitable immunogens for improved antibody selection

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.70100 · Paper page

Abstract

Antibodies are indispensable in laboratory and clinical applications due to their high specificity and affinity for protein antigens. However, selecting the right protein fragments as immunogens for antibody production remains challenging. Leveraging the Human Protein Atlas, this study systematically evaluates immunogen properties aiming to identify key factors that influence their suitability. Antibodies were classified as successful or unsuccessful based on standardized validation experiments, and the structural and functional properties of their immunogens were analyzed. Results indicated that longer immunogens often resulted in more successful but less specific antibodies. Shorter immunogens (50 residues or fewer) with disordered or unfolded regions at the N- or C-terminus and long coil stretches, were more likely to generate successful antibodies. Conversely, immunogens with high beta sheet content, multiple secondary structure elements, transmembrane regions, or disulfide bridges were associated with poorer antibody performance. Post-translational modification sites within immunogens appeared to mark beneficial regions for antibody generation. To support antibody selection, a novel R package, immunogenViewer, was developed, enabling researchers to easily apply these insights when immunogen sequences are disclosed. By providing a deeper understanding of immunogen suitability, this study promotes the development of more effective antibodies, ultimately addressing issues of reproducibility and reliability in antibody-based research. The findings are highly relevant to the research community, as end-users often lack control over the immunogen selection process in antibody production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.10.07.617016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100155 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1100787 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/15321819.2018.1515775 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s43587-023-00403-3 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nrc.2016.153 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.10.011 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-380920-9.00011-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028718 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-1-60761-783-9_7 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.12.001 · DOI
  12. 10.3390/ijms20246289 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/s40364-022-00425-w · DOI
  14. Grant, G. A . Synthetic Peptides for Production of Antibodies that Recognize Intact Proteins. Current Protocols in Immunology 55, (2003). · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1260419 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/pmic.200800203 · DOI
  17. 10.1110/ps.073347208 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/pmic.200500072 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/521274a · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/pro.3307 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2144/05385ST02 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/pro.245 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s00018-009-0014-6 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/pro.4466 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/pro.2869 · DOI
  26. 10.1110/ps.0304803 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s12038-015-9554-0 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90515-5 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/pr060674u · DOI
  30. 10.1002/pro.2324 · DOI
  31. 10.1369/0022155411400866 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/biot.201300341 · DOI
  33. 10.1074/mcp.M800264-MCP200 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1002/prot.25674 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00366 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx431 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB354 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Waury, K., Kvartsberg, H., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Teunissen, C. E., & Abeln, S.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
Corresponding author
Abeln, Sanne
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-10-11
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
e70100-e70100
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408745641
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (SG-23-1038904 QC, ADSF-21-831377-C, #ADSF‐24‐1284328‐C, ZEN-21-848495, ADSF‐21‐831376‐C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, SG-23-1038904, 2021 Zenith Award, -21- 831377-C)
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (201809–2016862)
  • Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse (860197)
  • Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  • Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor (FO2022‐0270, 860197)
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND 2021-00694, JPND2019-466-236)
  • Netherlands eScience Center
  • International Progressive MS Alliance
  • European Partnership on Metrology
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University College London (UKDRI‐1003)
  • European Commission (101034344, 101,053,962, 831434, JPND2021‐00694, HORIZON2020, ALFGBG-71320, JPND2019‐466‐236, 860197, 2022-2025)
  • ZonMw (10510032120003, #73305095007)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (#73305095007)
  • Hjärnfonden (ALZ2022-0006), #FO2022-0270, FO2017‑0243, FO2017, ALFGBG-715986, #ALFGBG-965240, JPND2019-466-236)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (ALFGBG-965240, ALZ2022-0006, #101053962, 2017-00915, (#ALFGBG-715986, 2022-01018, ALFGBG‐71320, 2022-00732, 2023-00356, 2019-02397, JPND2019-466-236, FO2017-0243)
  • Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond
  • Alzheimerfonden (994551, AF-994551, #AF‐968270, AF-930351, AF‐939721)
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (101034344)
  • Alzheimer Nederland (LSHM20106)
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (#2017-00915, UKDRI‐ 1003)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimer
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (860197, 831434, 101053962, 22HLT07)
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (101053962, 860197)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
antibody production, antibody specificity, protein disorder, coil regions, β-sheet content, transmembrane domain, disulfide bonds, post-translational modification sites, Human Protein Atlas, R package, Bioconductor
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Antigens, Humans, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review