The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data-driven evaluation of suitable immunogens for improved antibody selection
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.70100 · Paper page
Abstract
Antibodies are indispensable in laboratory and clinical applications due to their high specificity and affinity for protein antigens. However, selecting the right protein fragments as immunogens for antibody production remains challenging. Leveraging the Human Protein Atlas, this study systematically evaluates immunogen properties aiming to identify key factors that influence their suitability. Antibodies were classified as successful or unsuccessful based on standardized validation experiments, and the structural and functional properties of their immunogens were analyzed. Results indicated that longer immunogens often resulted in more successful but less specific antibodies. Shorter immunogens (50 residues or fewer) with disordered or unfolded regions at the N- or C-terminus and long coil stretches, were more likely to generate successful antibodies. Conversely, immunogens with high beta sheet content, multiple secondary structure elements, transmembrane regions, or disulfide bridges were associated with poorer antibody performance. Post-translational modification sites within immunogens appeared to mark beneficial regions for antibody generation. To support antibody selection, a novel R package, immunogenViewer, was developed, enabling researchers to easily apply these insights when immunogen sequences are disclosed. By providing a deeper understanding of immunogen suitability, this study promotes the development of more effective antibodies, ultimately addressing issues of reproducibility and reliability in antibody-based research. The findings are highly relevant to the research community, as end-users often lack control over the immunogen selection process in antibody production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Varadi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100155 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420862.2015.1100787 · DOI
- 10.1080/15321819.2018.1515775 · DOI
- 10.1038/s43587-023-00403-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrc.2016.153 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-380920-9.00011-0 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0028718 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-60761-783-9_7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.12.001 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms20246289 · DOI
- 10.1186/s40364-022-00425-w · DOI
- Grant, G. A . Synthetic Peptides for Production of Antibodies that Recognize Intact Proteins. Current Protocols in Immunology 55, (2003). · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1260419 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pmic.200800203 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.073347208 · DOI
- 10.1002/pmic.200500072 · DOI
- 10.1038/521274a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3307 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2144/05385ST02 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.245 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00018-009-0014-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4466 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.2869 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.0304803 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12038-015-9554-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90515-5 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr060674u · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.2324 · DOI
- 10.1369/0022155411400866 · DOI
- 10.1002/biot.201300341 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M800264-MCP200 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.25674 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00366 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx431 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB354 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Waury, K., Kvartsberg, H., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Teunissen, C. E., & Abeln, S.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- University of Wisconsin System (US)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Abeln, Sanne
- ORCID
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-10-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e70100-e70100
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11926642
- OpenAlex
- W4408745641
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Alzheimer's Association (SG-23-1038904 QC, ADSF-21-831377-C, #ADSF‐24‐1284328‐C, ZEN-21-848495, ADSF‐21‐831376‐C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, SG-23-1038904, 2021 Zenith Award, -21- 831377-C)
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (201809–2016862)
- Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse (860197)
- Cure Alzheimer's Fund
- Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor (FO2022‐0270, 860197)
- EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND 2021-00694, JPND2019-466-236)
- Netherlands eScience Center
- International Progressive MS Alliance
- European Partnership on Metrology
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- University College London (UKDRI‐1003)
- European Commission (101034344, 101,053,962, 831434, JPND2021‐00694, HORIZON2020, ALFGBG-71320, JPND2019‐466‐236, 860197, 2022-2025)
- ZonMw (10510032120003, #73305095007)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (#73305095007)
- Hjärnfonden (ALZ2022-0006), #FO2022-0270, FO2017‑0243, FO2017, ALFGBG-715986, #ALFGBG-965240, JPND2019-466-236)
- Vetenskapsrådet (ALFGBG-965240, ALZ2022-0006, #101053962, 2017-00915, (#ALFGBG-715986, 2022-01018, ALFGBG‐71320, 2022-00732, 2023-00356, 2019-02397, JPND2019-466-236, FO2017-0243)
- Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond
- Alzheimerfonden (994551, AF-994551, #AF‐968270, AF-930351, AF‐939721)
- Innovative Medicines Initiative (101034344)
- Alzheimer Nederland (LSHM20106)
- UK Dementia Research Institute (#2017-00915, UKDRI‐ 1003)
- Fondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimer
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (860197, 831434, 101053962, 22HLT07)
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (101053962, 860197)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- antibody production, antibody specificity, protein disorder, coil regions, β-sheet content, transmembrane domain, disulfide bonds, post-translational modification sites, Human Protein Atlas, R package, Bioconductor
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Antigens, Humans, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review