The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topological rearrangements activate the HerA-DUF anti-phage defense system
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.02.001
Abstract
Summary: Leveraging the rich structural information provided by AlphaFold, we used integrated experimental approaches to characterize the HerA-DUF4297 (DUF) anti-phage defense system, in which DUF is of unknown function. To infer the function of DUF, we performed structure-guided genomic analysis and found that DUF homologs are universally present in bacterial immune defense systems. One notable homolog of DUF is Cap4, a universal effector with nuclease activity in CBASS, the most prevalent anti-phage system in bacteria. To test the inferred nuclease function of DUF, we performed biochemical experiments and discovered that the DUF only exhibits activity against DNA substrates when it is bound by HerA. To understand how HerA activates DUF, we determined the structures of DUF and the HerA-DUF complex. DUF forms large oligomeric assemblies with or without HerA, suggesting that oligomerization per se is not sufficient for DUF activation. Instead, DUF activation requires dramatic topological rearrangements that propagate from HerA to the entire HerA-DUF complex, leading to reorganization of DUF for effective DNA cleavage. We further validated these structural insights by structure- guided mutagenesis. Together, these findings reveal dramatic topological rearrangements throughout the HerA-DUF complex, challenge the long-standing dogma that protein oligomerization alone activates immune signaling, and may inform the activation mechanism of CBASS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.029 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41577-022-00705-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102312 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aba0372 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.019 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06510-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth444 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166943 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-44660-7 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M707678200 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abm4096 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.013 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13238-021-00839-6 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cpbi.108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S2059798321007907 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06622-3 · DOI
- 2021, Understanding how dimension reduction tools work: an empirical approach to deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for data visualization, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22, 1
- 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python., the Journal of machine Learning research, 12, 2825
- Schubert, E. , Sander, J. , Ester, M. , Kriegel, H. P. & Xu, X. W. DBSCAN Revisited, Revisited: Why and How You Should (Still) Use DBSCAN. Acm T Database Syst 42, doi:Artn 1910.1145/3068335 (2017). · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444912001308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42003-021-02399-1 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15642-w · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Rish, A. D., Fosuah, E., Shen, Z., Marathe, I. A., Wysocki, V. H., & Fu, T.-M.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fu, Tian-Min
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-10-24
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1189-1201.e5
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13189363
- OpenAlex
- W4407910449
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Cell (acceptedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ohio State University
- National Institutes of Health (GM144293-01)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (HHS 1RM1GM149374, T32GM118291, RM1GM149374, R35GM147465)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- anti-phage defense systems, CRISPR-Cas, nuclease activation, DNA cleavage, protein oligomerization, HERA, bacterial immunity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review