PreprintCited by 0Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AlphaPulldown2 – A General Pipeline for High-Throughput Structural Modeling

Open access
Molodenskiy, Dmitry, Maurer, Valentin J., Yu, Dingquan, Chojnowski, Grzegorz, Bienert, Stefan, Tauriello, Gerardo, Gilep, Konstantin, Schwede, Torsten, Kosinski, Jan·2024·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf115 · Paper page

Abstract

AlphaPulldown2 streamlines protein structural modeling by automating workflows, improving code adaptability, and optimizing data management for large-scale applications. It introduces an automated Snakemake pipeline, compressed data storage, support for additional modeling backends like UniFold and AlphaLink2, and a range of other improvements. These upgrades make AlphaPulldown2 a versatile platform for predicting both binary interactions and complex multi-unit assemblies. Availability: AlphaPulldown2 is freely available at https://github.com/KosinskiLab/AlphaPulldown .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.11.28.625873

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1107/S2059798323003595 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.7554/eLife.96832 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41467-022-29500-4 · DOI
  5. Evans, R. et al. (2021). Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv, 2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkv397 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.str.2021.11.007 · DOI
  8. Humphreys, I. et al. (2021). Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes. Science, 374. · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41467-024-52801-9 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100744 · DOI
  12. Li, Z. et al. (2022). Uni-Fold: An Open-Source Platform for Developing Protein Folding Models beyond AlphaFold. bioRxiv, 2022.08.04.502811. · DOI
  13. Malhotra, S. et al. (2021). Assessment of protein-protein interfaces in cryo-EM derived assemblies. Nature Communications, 12. · DOI
  14. 2014, Docker: lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment, Linux Journal, 2014, 2
  15. 10.1038/s41467-024-52951-w · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2021, Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake, F1000Research, 10, 33, 10.12688/f1000research.29032.2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.str.2008.12.014 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41467-023-39150-9 · DOI
  21. Sellés-Baiget, S. et al. (2024). Catalytic and noncatalytic functions of DNA polymerase κ in translesion DNA synthesis. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 1–15. · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41467-024-51771-2 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168021 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167599 · DOI
  28. Yu, D. et al. (2023). AlphaPulldown—a python package for protein–protein interaction screens using AlphaFold-Multimer. Bioinformatics, 39. · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Molodenskiy, D., Maurer, V. J., Yu, D., Chojnowski, G., Bienert, S., Tauriello, G., Gilep, K., Schwede, T., & Kosinski, J.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-12-03
OpenAlex
W4404945890
Cited by
0
References
5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Desy publication database (The Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101119142)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein structure modeling, Snakemake, protein-protein interaction, AlphaFold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review