PreprintCited by 2DNA Repair MechanismsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lineage–specific amino acids define functional attributes of the protomer-protomer interfaces for the Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases

Open access
Petassi, Mike, Shin, Yeonoh, Jessop, Aidan M., Morse, Katherine, Kim, Stefan Y., Matei, Razvan, Raina, Vivek B., Greene, Eric C.·2024·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.111019 · Paper page

Abstract

Most eukaryotes possess two Rad51/RecA family DNA recombinases that are thought to have arisen from an ancient gene duplication event: Rad51, which is expressed in both mitosis and meiosis; and Dmc1, which is only expressed in meiosis. To explore the evolutionary relationship between these recombinases, here, we present high-resolution CryoEM structures of S. cerevisiae Rad51 filaments and S. cerevisiae Dmc1 filaments bound to ssDNA, which reveal a pair of stacked interfacial aromatic amino acid residues that are nearly universally conserved in Rad51 but are absent from Dmc1. We use a combination of bioinformatics, genetic analysis of natural sequence variation, and deep mutational analysis to probe the functionally tolerated sequence space for these stacked aromatic residues. Our findings demonstrate that the functional landscape of the interfacial aromatic residues within the Rad51 filament is highly constrained. In contrast, the amino acids at the equivalent positions within the Dmc1 filament exhibit a broad functional landscape. This work helps highlight the distinct evolutionary trajectories of these two eukaryotic recombinases, which may have contributed to their functional and mechanistic divergence. AUTHOR SUMMARY: Most eukaryotic organisms have two closely related proteins, Rad51 and Dmc1, that are needed for different aspects of genetic recombination. These proteins may have evolved from a single gene that was duplicated during the early evolution of eukaryotes. Rad51 is active during both normal cell division (mitosis) and sexual reproduction (meiosis), while Dmc1 is only active during meiosis. To better understand how these proteins are related, we studied their three-dimensional structures using high resolution cryogenic electron microscopy. Our findings show that Rad51 has a specific set of conserved amino acids located at the protein interfaces, but this set of amino acids is different in Dmc1. We used a series of genetic approaches to analyze how these amino acids affect the proteins’ function. Our results show that Rad51 has a strict set of rules governing the identify of these amino acids, whereas Dmc1 does not. This research sheds light on how Rad51 and Dmc1 have evolved differently, leading to distinct functions in genetic recombination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.12.03.626531

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. 10.1038/nrg1947 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2741/A304 · DOI
  4. Kowalczykowski SC . An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(11). · DOI
  5. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016444 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/MMBR.63.2.349-404.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1534/genetics.114.166140 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/35003501 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01568-1 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1075277 · DOI
  11. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155547 · DOI
  12. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016428 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nrg3962 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016659 · DOI
  15. Hunter N . Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(12). · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature04885 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00419-1 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nature06971 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.aab2666 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.029 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.gde.2021.09.002 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41586-020-2820-9 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90446-J · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00500-1 · DOI
  25. Zickler D , Kleckner N. Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(6). · DOI
  26. Chintapalli SV , Bhardwaj G , Babu J , Hadjiyianni L , Hong Y , Todd GK , et al. Reevaluation of the evolutionary events within recA/RAD51 phylogeny. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:240. · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.0604232103 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.003 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.8456313 · DOI
  30. 10.1101/gad.328062.119 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90447-K · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nar/gkab1141 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41467-020-20258-1 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nsmb795 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/emboj/cdf293 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nsmb.3336 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/jp907887y · DOI
  38. 10.1186/1752-153X-7-44 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/pro.3698 · DOI
  40. 2018, Modeling Protein S-Aromatic Motifs Reveals Their Structural and Redox Flexibility, J Phys Chem B, 122, 3760, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b00089 · DOI
  41. 10.1126/science.185.4154.862 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/pro.4362 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/pro.4161 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/BF00264859 · DOI
  45. Brinkworth RI , Munn AL , Kobe B . Protein kinases associated with the yeast phosphoproteome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:47. · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129843 · DOI
  47. 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25778 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.02.008 · DOI
  49. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001143 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005653 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90038-8 · DOI
  52. 10.1073/pnas.97.20.10814 · DOI
  53. 10.1105/tpc.112.098459 · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.1810457115 · DOI
  55. 10.1534/genetics.113.150615 · DOI
  56. 10.1074/jbc.C900023200 · DOI
  57. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1480347.x · DOI
  58. 10.1101/gad.12.14.2208 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.019 · DOI
  60. 10.1101/gad.1638708 · DOI
  61. Crickard JB , Kaniecki K , Kwon Y , Sung P , Lisby M , Greene EC . Regulation of Hed1 and Rad54 binding during maturation of the meiosis-specific presynaptic complex. Embo j. 2018;37(7). · DOI
  62. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006146 · DOI
  63. 10.1101/gad.1422506 · DOI
  64. 10.1073/pnas.0404195101 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/gkv172 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/nsmb923 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/nar/gkt924 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.031 · DOI
  69. 10.1111/gtc.13138 · DOI
  70. 10.1534/genetics.103.025700 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.007 · DOI
  74. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  76. Emsley P , Cowtan K . Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(Pt 12 Pt 1):2126-32. · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1107/S0907444910026582 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.08.005 · DOI
  79. 10.1385/1-59259-958-3:107 · DOI
  80. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185056 · DOI
  81. 10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Waskom ML . Seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software. 2021;6:3021. · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.04.001 · DOI
  84. 10.1093/emboj/cdg429 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Petassi, M., Shin, Y., Jessop, A. M., Morse, K., Kim, S. Y., Matei, R., Raina, V. B., & Greene, E. C.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Greene, Eric C.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-12-04
Volume
302
Issue
1
Pages
111019-111019
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417137711
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1817315)
  • Simons Foundation (SF 349247)
  • Columbia University (P30CA013696)
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (75N91019D00024, U24GM129539)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (MCB-1817315)
  • National Cancer Institute (K00CA274696, P30CA013696)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U24GM129539, R35GM118026)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
RAD51, DMC1, single-stranded DNA binding, meiosis, gene duplication, evolutionary divergence, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review