The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CORGIAS: identifying correlated gene pairs by considering evolutionary history in a large-scale prokaryotic genome dataset
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/nargab/lqaf182 · Paper page
Abstract
The recent expansion of prokaryotic genomes reveals many ortholog groups (OGs) whose function cannot be inferred from conventional, sequence similarity-based annotation methods, especially in metagenome-assembled genomes. Phylogenetic profiling is one of the promising methods to annotate these OGs, by identifying functional relationships of OGs using co- or anti-occurrence of OGs distributions, not sequence similarity. Here, we proposed two new phylogenetic methods for large-scale data, Ancestral State Adjustment (ASA) and Simultaneous EVolution test (SEV), which consider the ancestral state of gene presence/absence. In evaluations using three distinct prokaryotic datasets, ASA and SEV showed better or comparable performance to both established and recently proposed methods for large-scale data. We compared the functionally related genes detected by each method and found that SEV and its predecessor can identify slowly evolving genes, such as housekeeping genes. In contrast, ASA and its predecessors can detect functionally related genes that tend to be gained or lost in a fixed-order, indicating a strong evolutionary constraint that provides clues for functional prediction. Using matrix multiplication, we showed that SEV is scalable in the latest genome databases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- 10.1038/nature14486 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, A new view of the tree of life, Nat Microbiol, 1, 16048, 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0603-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, NMPFamsDB: a database of novel protein families from microbial metagenomes and metatranscriptomes, Nucleic Acids Res, 52, D502
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06955-z · DOI
- 10.1038/s41579-018-0076-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11779 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.025 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007553 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2218329120 · DOI
- 2023, PPNet: Identifying Functional Association Networks by Phylogenetic Profiling of Prokaryotic Genomes, Microbiol Spectr, 11, e03871
- 10.1093/pcp/pcae083 · DOI
- 2020, Coinfinder: detecting significant associations and dissociations in pangenomes, Microb. Genom, 6, e000338
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt834 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41396-018-0058-4 · DOI
- 10.1101/2024.04.29.591652 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2317954121 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1994.0006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkt471 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/sysbio/syac052 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.4229 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database, Nat Microbiol, 6, 946, 10.1038/s41564-021-00918-8 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKZ246 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-s6-s7 · DOI
- 2021, PhyloCorrelate: inferring bacterial gene-gene functional associations through large-scale phylogenetic profiling, Bioinform Oxf Engl, 37, 17
- 10.1093/nar/gkg034 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-383 · DOI
- 2025, EvoWeaver: large-scale prediction of gene functional associations from coevolutionary signals, Nat. Commun, 16, 3878, 10.1038/s41467-025-59175-6 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msz131 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005958 · DOI
- 2021, GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, gkab776
- 10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D274
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.013 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt847 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.adc9130 · DOI
- 2021, Mirage: estimation of ancestral gene-copy numbers by considering different evolutionary patterns among gene families, Bioinform. Adv, 1, vbab014, 10.1093/bioadv/vbab014 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac433 · DOI
- 10.1101/2024.12.02.626417 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0606318104 · DOI
- 10.1093/ismejo/wrae129 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaf166 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093609 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad215 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002340 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2304934120 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41596-019-0211-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac367 · DOI
- 2017, Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions, Brief. Bioinform, 19, 575
- 2023, Gene set correlation enrichment analysis for interpreting and annotating gene expression profiles, Nucleic Acids Res, 52, e17
- 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Nishimura, Y., Omae, K., Tominaga, K., & Iwasaki, W.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- RIKEN Pioneering Research Institute (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Nishimura, Yuki
- Venue
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-05-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- lqaf182-lqaf182
- ISSN
- 2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12699329
- OpenAlex
- W4417303632
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22H04925, CREST)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJCR19S2, CREST, CREST JPMJCR19S2, JPMJGX23B2)
- Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR19S2)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- orthogroups, phylogenetic profiling, gene function prediction, metagenome-assembled genomes, prokaryotic genomes, gene gain and loss, housekeeping genes, functional annotation
- MeSH terms
- Phylogeny, Genome, Bacterial, Evolution, Molecular, Databases, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review