PreprintCited by 1Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CORGIAS: identifying correlated gene pairs by considering evolutionary history in a large-scale prokaryotic genome dataset

Open access
Nishimura, Yuki, Omae, Kimiho, Tominaga, Kento, Iwasaki, Wataru·2025·NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/nargab/lqaf182 · Paper page

Abstract

The recent expansion of prokaryotic genomes reveals many ortholog groups (OGs) whose function cannot be inferred from conventional, sequence similarity-based annotation methods, especially in metagenome-assembled genomes. Phylogenetic profiling is one of the promising methods to annotate these OGs, by identifying functional relationships of OGs using co- or anti-occurrence of OGs distributions, not sequence similarity. Here, we proposed two new phylogenetic methods for large-scale data, Ancestral State Adjustment (ASA) and Simultaneous EVolution test (SEV), which consider the ancestral state of gene presence/absence. In evaluations using three distinct prokaryotic datasets, ASA and SEV showed better or comparable performance to both established and recently proposed methods for large-scale data. We compared the functionally related genes detected by each method and found that SEV and its predecessor can identify slowly evolving genes, such as housekeeping genes. In contrast, ASA and its predecessors can detect functionally related genes that tend to be gained or lost in a fixed-order, indicating a strong evolutionary constraint that provides clues for functional prediction. Using matrix multiplication, we showed that SEV is scalable in the latest genome databases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.05.07.652372

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1038/nature14486 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2016, A new view of the tree of life, Nat Microbiol, 1, 16048, 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41587-020-0603-3 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2023, NMPFamsDB: a database of novel protein families from microbial metagenomes and metatranscriptomes, Nucleic Acids Res, 52, D502
  6. 10.1038/s41586-023-06955-z · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41579-018-0076-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature11779 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.025 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007553 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.2218329120 · DOI
  13. 2023, PPNet: Identifying Functional Association Networks by Phylogenetic Profiling of Prokaryotic Genomes, Microbiol Spectr, 11, e03871
  14. 10.1093/pcp/pcae083 · DOI
  15. 2020, Coinfinder: detecting significant associations and dissociations in pangenomes, Microb. Genom, 6, e000338
  16. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac034 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/nbt834 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41396-018-0058-4 · DOI
  19. 10.1101/2024.04.29.591652 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.2317954121 · DOI
  21. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0006 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkt471 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.034 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/sysbio/syac052 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nbt.4229 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2021, A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database, Nat Microbiol, 6, 946, 10.1038/s41564-021-00918-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/NAR/GKZ246 · DOI
  28. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-s6-s7 · DOI
  29. 2021, PhyloCorrelate: inferring bacterial gene-gene functional associations through large-scale phylogenetic profiling, Bioinform Oxf Engl, 37, 17
  30. 10.1093/nar/gkg034 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-383 · DOI
  32. 2025, EvoWeaver: large-scale prediction of gene functional associations from coevolutionary signals, Nat. Commun, 16, 3878, 10.1038/s41467-025-59175-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/molbev/msz131 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005958 · DOI
  35. 2021, GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, gkab776
  36. 10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2020, COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D274
  38. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1000 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.013 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkt847 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.002 · DOI
  43. 10.1126/sciadv.adc9130 · DOI
  44. 2021, Mirage: estimation of ancestral gene-copy numbers by considering different evolutionary patterns among gene families, Bioinform. Adv, 1, vbab014, 10.1093/bioadv/vbab014 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac433 · DOI
  46. 10.1101/2024.12.02.626417 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.0606318104 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/ismejo/wrae129 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/molbev/msaf166 · DOI
  50. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093609 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad215 · DOI
  52. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002340 · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.2304934120 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s41596-019-0211-1 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/nar/gkac367 · DOI
  56. 2017, Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions, Brief. Bioinform, 19, 575
  57. 2023, Gene set correlation enrichment analysis for interpreting and annotating gene expression profiles, Nucleic Acids Res, 52, e17
  58. 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Nishimura, Y., Omae, K., Tominaga, K., & Iwasaki, W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • RIKEN Pioneering Research Institute (JP)
Corresponding author
Nishimura, Yuki
Venue
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-05-10
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
lqaf182-lqaf182
ISSN
2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417303632
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22H04925, CREST)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJCR19S2, CREST, CREST JPMJCR19S2, JPMJGX23B2)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR19S2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
orthogroups, phylogenetic profiling, gene function prediction, metagenome-assembled genomes, prokaryotic genomes, gene gain and loss, housekeeping genes, functional annotation
MeSH terms
Phylogeny, Genome, Bacterial, Evolution, Molecular, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review