The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RP3Net: a deep learning model for predicting recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btag003
Abstract
Recombinant protein expression can be a limiting step in the production of protein reagents for drug discovery and other biotechnology applications. We introduce RP3Net (Recombinant Protein Production Prediction Network), an AI model of small-scale heterologous soluble protein expression in Escherichia coli . RP3Net utilizes the most recent protein and genomic foundational models. A curated dataset of internal experimental results from AstraZeneca (AZ) and publicly available data from the Structural Genomics Consortium (SGC) was used for training, validation and testing of RP3Net. Set Transformer Pooling (STP) aggregation and Meta Label Correction (MLC) with large scale purification data enabled RP3Net to improve Area Under Receiver Operator Curve (AUROC) by 0.15, compared to the baseline model. When experimentally validated on an independent, manually selected set of 97 constructs, RP3Net outperformed currently available models, with an AUROC of 0.83, delivering accurate predictions in 77% of the cases, and correctly identifying successfully expressing constructs in 92% of cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 81
- Zanders, E. D. The Science and Business of Drug Discovery: Demystifying the Jargon: Second Edition. The Science and Business of Drug Discovery: Demystifying the Jargon: Second Edition (Springer International Publishing, 2020). · DOI
- 10.3389/fddsv.2023.1201419 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.f.202 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pep.2007.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pep.2008.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pep.2008.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pep.2008.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pep.2008.10.022 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6750-9-21 · DOI
- 10.1002/0471140864.ps0524s61 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0139695 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-6887-9_2 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12934-019-1083-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0892-0_3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0892-0_4 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0892-0_7 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0892-0_5 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-0892-0_6 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-04080-3 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0271403 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00253-023-12805-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-381274-2.00002-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-43650-z · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-7799(85)90068-X · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac020 · DOI · Paper page
- Nguyen, E. , et al. HyenaDNA: Long-Range Genomic Sequence Modeling at Single Nucleotide Resolution. ArXiv (2023).
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab083 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou, Z. et al. DNABERT-2: Efficient Foundation Model and Benchmark For Multi-Species Genome. ArXiv (2023).
- 10.1038/s42256-024-00791-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gks1195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkad903 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1080 · DOI
- 2018, BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1, 4171
- 10.1101/2024.07.01.600583 · DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
- Rao, R. et al. Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9686–9698 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Dallago, C. , et al. FLIP: Benchmark tasks in fitness landscape inference for proteins. in Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) (2021). · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab801 · DOI
- Wang, S. & Zhao, H . SADeepcry: a deep learning framework for protein crystallization propensity prediction using self-attention and auto-encoder networks. Brief Bioinform 23, (2022). · DOI
- 10.1007/s12539-024-00639-6 · DOI
- Li, F.-Z. , Amini, A. P. , Yue, Y. , Yang, K. K. & Lu, A. X. Feature Reuse and Scaling: Understanding Transfer Learning with Protein Language Models. in Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (eds. Salakhutdinov, R. et al.) vol. 235 27351–27375 (PMLR, 2024). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10969-011-9106-2 · DOI
- Protein production data from the SGC. Preprint at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/SGC/studies/S-BSST681 (2022).
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1077 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr229 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0105902 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep21383 · DOI
- Zhu, Y.-H. et al. Accurate multistage prediction of protein crystallization propensity using deep-cascade forest with sequence-based features. Brief Bioinform 22, (2021). · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1102 · DOI
- Friedman, J. H . Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics 29, (2001). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.09.026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkae381 · DOI
- Zhang, X. et al. PLM_Sol: predicting protein solubility by benchmarking multiple protein language models with the updated Escherichia coli protein solubility dataset. Brief Bioinform 25, (2024). · DOI
- 10.1002/bab.2600 · DOI
- 10.3389/fbioe.2022.856049 · DOI
- 2022, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 19746
- 2019, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, 97, 3744
- Taraday, M. K. & Baskin, C. Enhanced Meta Label Correction for Coping with Label Corruption. ArXiv (2023). · DOI
- Zheng, G. , Awadallah, A. H. & Dumais, S. Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learning. in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2021). · DOI
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ads0018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- Sankar, K. , et al. A Descriptor Set for Quantitative Structure-property Relationship Prediction in Biologics. Mol Inform 41, (2022). · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2003.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw306 · DOI
- 2016, Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments, Nucleic Acids Res, 45, D170
- Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019).
- 10.18653/V1/2020.EMNLP-DEMOS.6 · DOI · Paper page
- Falcon, W. & The PyTorch Lightning team. PyTorch Lightning. Preprint at (2019).
- 10.1109/ASRU57964.2023.10389632 · DOI
- Mangrulkar, S. , et al. PEFT: State-of-the-art Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning methods. Preprint at https://github.com/huggingface/peft (2022).
- 10.1093/nar/gkad1004 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1046 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Tankhilevich, E., Martinez Cuesta, S., Barrett, I., Berg, C., Holmberg Schiavone, L., & Leach, A. R.
- Affiliations
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- Data Sciences and Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Astra-Zeneca, Cambridge, UK
- AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Protein Science, Structure and Biophysics, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Corresponding author
- Tankhilevich, Evgeny
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-05-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12857573
- OpenAlex
- W7123362149
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- European Bioinformatics Institute
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- recombinant protein expression, Escherichia coli, heterologous expression, deep learning, AstraZeneca
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Escherichia coli, Recombinant Proteins, Software, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review