PreprintCited by 257Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationScientific Computing and Data Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomni: A General-Purpose Biomedical AI Agent

Open access

Abstract

Biomedical research underpins progress in our understanding of human health and disease, drug discovery, and clinical care. However, with the growth of complex lab experiments, large datasets, many analytical tools, and expansive literature, biomedical research is increasingly constrained by repetitive and fragmented workflows that slow discovery and limit innovation, underscoring the need for a fundamentally new way to scale scientific expertise. Here, we introduce Biomni, a general-purpose biomedical AI agent designed to autonomously execute a wide spectrum of research tasks across diverse biomedical subfields. To systematically map the biomedical action space, Biomni first employs an action discovery agent to create the first unified agentic environment – mining essential tools, databases, and protocols from tens of thousands of publications across 25 biomedical domains. Built on this foundation, Biomni features a generalist agentic architecture that integrates large language model (LLM) reasoning with retrieval-augmented planning and code-based execution, enabling it to dynamically compose and carry out complex biomedical workflows – entirely without relying on predefined templates or rigid task flows. Systematic benchmarking demonstrates that Biomni achieves strong generalization across heterogeneous biomedical tasks – including causal gene prioritization, drug repurposing, rare disease diagnosis, micro-biome analysis, and molecular cloning – without any task-specific prompt tuning. Real-world case studies further showcase Biomni’s ability to interpret complex, multi-modal biomedical datasets and autonomously generate experimentally testable protocols. Biomni envisions a future where virtual AI biologists operate alongside and augment human scientists to dramatically enhance research productivity, clinical insight, and healthcare. Biomni is ready to use at https://biomni.stanford.edu , and we invite scientists to explore its capabilities, stress-test its limits, and co-create the next era of biomedical discoveries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.05.30.656746

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1056/NEJ-Moa2212948 · DOI
  2. Cui, J. , Li, Z. , Yan, Y. , Chen, B. & Yuan, L . Chatlaw: Open-source legal large language model with integrated external knowledge bases. CoRR (2023).
  3. Qu, Y. et al. Crispr-gpt: An llm agent for automated design of gene-editing experiments. bioRxiv 2024–04 (2024). · DOI
  4. 10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143199 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–257 of 257

Metadata

Authors
Huang, K., Zhang, S., Wang, H., Qu, Y., Lu, Y., Roohani, Y., Li, R., Qiu, L., Li, G., Zhang, J., Yin, D., Marwaha, S., Carter, J. N., Zhou, X., Wheeler, M., Bernstein, J. A., Wang, M., He, P., Zhou, J., Snyder, M., Cong, L., Regev, A., & Leskovec, J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Arc Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Kexin
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-06-02
OpenAlex
W4411005431
Cited by
125
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 24
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Stanford Data Applications Initiative
  • Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute
  • Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
  • Amazon
  • Genentech
  • GSK
  • Hitachi
  • SAP
  • UCB
  • Stanford Bio-X fellowship
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS134358)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
large language model reasoning, gene prioritization, drug repurposing, rare disease diagnosis, microbiome analysis, gene cloning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review