The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary insights into provirus-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems in halophilic archaea
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/femsml/uqaf033
Abstract
Prokaryotic microorganisms coexist with mobile genetic elements (MGEs), which can be both genetic threats and evolutionary catalysts. In Haloferax lucentense , a halophilic archaeon, we have recently identified an unusual genomic arrangement: a complete type I-B CRISPR-Cas system encoded on a mega-plasmid coexists with a partial counterpart within an integrated provirus in the main chromosome. The provirus-encoded system lacks the adaptation genes ( cas1, cas2 , and cas4 ), suggesting its potential reliance on the plasmid-encoded CRISPR-Cas module for the acquisition of new spacers. This arrangement suggests a potential instance of “adaptive outsourcing,” where a provirus might leverage a co-resident MGE for a key function. Through comparative genomics, we show that similar proviral CRISPR-Cas systems are found in distantly related haloarchaea (e.g., Natrinema and Halobacterium ), indicating probable virus-mediated horizontal transfer and suggesting they may function as mobile defense modules. Phylogenetic analysis highlights distinct evolutionary origins of the two systems: the plasmid system clusters with other Haloferax CRISPR-Cas systems, while the proviral system clusters with those from other genera, consistent with horizontal acquisition. Interestingly, spacer analysis reveals that the proviral systems predominantly target viral sequences, while the plasmid system appears to target both plasmids and viral sequences, a distribution mirroring broader trends observed in other plasmid- and chromosome-encoded CRISPR systems. This observed targeting preference suggests a potential for complementarity that could support a model of cooperative immunity, where each system may protect its genetic “owner” from competition and, indirectly, the host.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/wrna.1159 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gky425 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2015.0496 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093830 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41576-019-0172-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/life4040681 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrmicro3569 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JB.05535-11 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41579-018-0071-7 · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.00036-12 · DOI
- 10.1038/35012500 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab859 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001514 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.27601 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072911-172315 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41564-018-0302-8 · DOI
- 10.1101/2024.02.12.579488 · DOI
- 1973, A new evolutionary law, Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1
- 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02082 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2205037119 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkm382 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-016-1103-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab883 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1135 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac1032 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1030 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0163962 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msae263 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkae1010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx839 · DOI
- 10.2307/2408678 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · DOI
- Nei M , Kumar S. 2000. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Naki, D., & Gophna, U.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Gophna, Uri
- ORCID
- Gophna, Uri
- Venue
- microLife
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-06-17
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- uqaf033-uqaf033
- ISSN
- 2633-6693 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12596717
- OpenAlex
- W4415502923
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- microLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- California Department of Fish and Game
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP 2141)
- University of Ghana (SPP2141)
- European Research Council (787514)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- halophilic archaea, megaplasmid, mobile genetic elements, horizontal gene transfer, antiviral defense, Natrinema, Halobacterium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review