PreprintCited by 2CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gene-sized DNA insertion at genomic safe harbors in human cells using a site-directed transposase

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/nar/gkaf1316

Abstract

Achieving precise and efficient integration of gene-sized DNA sequences into the human genome remains a major obstacle to gene therapy. Existing approaches depend on double-strand DNA breaks, which can lead to unintended genome alterations. Many monogenic diseases arise from diverse patient-specific mutations, making individualized correction impractical and underscoring the need for universal full-gene replacement strategies. We developed INsertion by Targeted Anchoring and Conditional Transposition (INTACT) to enable targeted insertion at genomic safe harbor loci. We engineered a mammalian transposase with mutations in its DNA-binding domain to reduce off-target integration. Site specificity was then restored by linking programmable sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins to the transposase. Systematic optimization of INTACT revealed key determinants of precision, including non-covalent linkage between the transposase and DNA-binding protein, strict spacing between the binding site and the TTAA insertion sequence, and linkage of the DNA-binding protein to an internal position within the transposase. On-target insertion was achieved across multiple loci, with optimized INTACT averaging 1.2 targeted insertions per cell. An off-target assay confirmed that DNA-binding domain mutations substantially reduced unwanted integration events to near-background levels. Our site-directed transposase enables precise, efficient genomic insertion of >4kb DNA without double-strand breaks, offering a powerful new tool for genome engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.09.16.676703

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 2022, The promise of gene editing: so close and yet so perilously far, Frontiers in genome editing, 4, 974798, 10.3389/fgeed.2022.974798 · DOI
  2. 2021, Expanding the Potential of Mammalian Genome Engineering via Targeted DNA Integration, ACS synthetic biology, 10, 429, 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00576 · DOI
  3. 10.1089/hum.2007.148 · DOI
  4. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020234 · DOI
  5. 10.1172/JCI35700 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1172/JCI35798 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2022, Lentivector cryptic splicing mediates increase in CD34+ clones expressing truncated HMGA2 in human X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency, Nature communications, 13, 3710, 10.1038/s41467-022-31344-x · DOI
  8. 2011, Innate Immune Responses to AAV Vectors, Frontiers in microbiology, 2, 194
  9. 10.1089/hum.2009.182 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2018, Impact of neutralizing antibodies against AAV is a key consideration in gene transfer to nonhuman primates, Nature medicine, 24, 699, 10.1038/s41591-018-0062-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1089/hum.2009.060 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nature16142 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/s41588-021-00838-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2019, CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces megabase-scale chromosomal truncations, Nature communications, 10, 1136, 10.1038/s41467-019-09006-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Alanis-Lobato, G. , Zohren, J. , McCarthy, A. , Fogarty, N.M.E. , Kubikova, N. , Hardman, E. , Greco, M. , Wells, D. , Turner, J.M.A. and Niakan, K.K . (2021) Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9-edited early human embryos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118. · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/nbt0918-899c · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature20565 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/s41591-018-0049-z · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s41591-018-0050-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nature17946 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.36.6.344 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/emboj.2008.41 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1217548110 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1008322108 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80436-5 · DOI
  29. 2025, Activity of the mammalian DNA transposon piggyBat from Myotis lucifugus is restricted by its own transposon ends, Nature communications, 16, 458, 10.1038/s41467-024-55784-9 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/nar/gkr764 · DOI
  31. 2020, Structural basis of seamless excision and specific targeting by piggyBac transposase, Nature communications, 11, 3446, 10.1038/s41467-020-17128-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/synbio/ysz018 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/nar/gkt677 · DOI
  34. 2006, Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration, FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 20, 1880, 10.1096/fj.05-5485fje · DOI
  35. 10.1093/nar/gks309 · DOI
  36. 2017, Comparative analysis of chimeric ZFP-, TALE– and Cas9-piggyBac transposases for integration into a single locus in human cells, Nucleic acids research, 45, 8411, 10.1093/nar/gkx572 · DOI
  37. 2021, CRISPR/dCas9-mediated transposition with specificity and efficiency of site-directed genomic insertions, FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 35, e21359, 10.1096/fj.202001830RR · DOI
  38. 2011, Manipulating piggyBac transposon chromosomal integration site selection in human cells, Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 19, 1636, 10.1038/mt.2011.129 · DOI
  39. Li, X. , Burnight, E.R. , Cooney, A.L. , Malani, N. , Brady, T. , Sander, J.D. , Staber, J. , Wheelan, S.J. , Joung, J.K. , McCray, P.B., Jr. , et al. (2013) piggyBac transposase tools for genome engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. · DOI
  40. 2012, Retargeting sleeping beauty transposon insertions by engineered zinc finger DNA-binding domains, Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 20, 1852, 10.1038/mt.2012.126 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gks317 · DOI
  42. Kovac, A. , Miskey, C. , Menzel, M. , Grueso, E. , Gogol-Doring, A. and Ivics, Z . (2020) RNA-guided retargeting of Sleeping Beauty transposition in human cells. eLife, 9. · DOI
  43. 10.1093/nar/gkm089 · DOI
  44. 2007, Targeted Sleeping Beauty transposition in human cells, Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 15, 1137, 10.1038/sj.mt.6300169 · DOI
  45. Klompe, S.E. , Vo, P.L.H. , Halpin-Healy, T.S. and Sternberg, S.H . (2019) Transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration. Nature. · DOI
  46. Strecker, J. , Ladha, A. , Gardner, Z. , Schmid-Burgk, J.L. , Makarova, K.S. , Koonin, E.V. and Zhang, F . (2019) RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science. · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41587-023-01748-1 · DOI
  48. 2019, The ALFA-tag is a highly versatile tool for nanobody-based bioscience applications, Nature communications, 10, 4403, 10.1038/s41467-019-12301-7 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gkt754 · DOI
  50. 2021, Find and cut– and-transfer (FiCAT) mammalian genome engineering, Nature communications, 12, 7071, 10.1038/s41467-021-27183-x · DOI
  51. 2019, Identification of novel breakpoints for locus– and region-specific translocations in 293 cells by molecular cytogenetics before and after irradiation, Scientific reports, 9, 10554, 10.1038/s41598-019-47002-0 · DOI
  52. Hew, B.E. , Gupta, S. , Sato, R. , Waller, D.F. , Stoytchev, I. , Short, J.E. , Sharek, L. , Tran, C.T. , Badran, A.H. and Owens, J.B . (2024) Directed evolution of hyperactive integrases for site specific insertion of transgenes. Nucleic acids research. · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.037 · DOI
  54. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14628 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2758 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 2010, Modular system for the construction of zinc-finger libraries and proteins, Nature protocols, 5, 791, 10.1038/nprot.2010.34 · DOI
  59. 10.1074/jbc.M506654200 · DOI
  60. 10.1074/jbc.M102604200 · DOI
  61. 2008, Unexpected failure rates for modular assembly of engineered zinc fingers, Nature methods, 5, 374, 10.1038/nmeth0508-374 · DOI
  62. 10.1101/gr.143693.112 · DOI
  63. 2014, Making the bend: DNA tertiary structure and protein-DNA interactions, International journal of molecular sciences, 15, 12335, 10.3390/ijms150712335 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/nbt.1717 · DOI
  65. Zhang, X. , Van Treeck, B. , Horton, C.A. , McIntyre, J.J.R. , Palm, S.M. , Shumate, J.L. and Collins, K. (2024) Harnessing eukaryotic retroelement proteins for transgene insertion into human safe-harbor loci. Nature biotechnology. · DOI
  66. 2020, Efficient Nuclease-Directed Integration of Lentivirus Vectors into the Human Ribosomal DNA Locus, Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 28, 1858, 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.05.019 · DOI
  67. 2021, Targeted addition of mini-dystrophin into rDNA locus of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patient-derived iPSCs, Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 545, 40, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.056 · DOI
  68. 2019, Ectopic expression of factor VIII in MSCs and hepatocytes derived from rDNA targeted hESCs, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 495, 656, 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.007 · DOI
  69. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037071 · DOI
  70. 2012, AAV vectors containing rDNA homology display increased chromosomal integration and transgene persistence, Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 20, 1902, 10.1038/mt.2012.157 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 2012, Ribosomal DNA integrating rAAV-rDNA vectors allow for stable transgene expression, Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 20, 1912, 10.1038/mt.2012.164 · DOI
  72. Hickman, A.B. and Dyda, F . (2015) Mechanisms of DNA Transposition. Microbiology spectrum, 3, MDNA3-0034-2014. · DOI
  73. 10.1126/science.adt5199 · DOI
  74. 10.1038/s41587-021-01133-w · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1089/hum.2021.173 · DOI
  76. 2011, Enhancing zinc-finger-nuclease activity with improved obligate heterodimeric architectures, Nature methods, 8, 74, 10.1038/nmeth.1539 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1038/nbt1319 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1038/nbt.3081 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 2021, PiggyBac transposase and transposon derivatives for gene transfer targeting the ribosomal DNA loci of CHO cells, Journal of biotechnology, 341, 103, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.09.011 · DOI
  80. Kovac, A. , Miskey, C. and Ivics, Z . (2023) Sleeping Beauty Transposon Insertions into Nucleolar DNA by an Engineered Transposase Localized in the Nucleolus. International journal of molecular sciences, 24. · DOI
  81. Chernyi, N. , Gavrilova, D. , Saruhanyan, M. , Oloruntimehin, E.S. , Karabelsky, A. , Bezsonov, E. and Malogolovkin, A . (2024) Recent Advances in Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: Projecting the Perspectives. Biomolecules, 14. · DOI
  82. 2022, Transposase N-terminal phosphorylation and asymmetric transposon ends inhibit piggyBac transposition in mammalian cells, Nucleic acids research, 50, 13128, 10.1093/nar/gkac1191 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Short, J. E., Sharek, L., Meckler, J. F., Stoytchev, I., Tran, C. T., Errard, C., Hew, B. E., Johnson, B. E., Waller, D. F., Xie, S., Higgins, J. J., Tabibiazar, R., & Owens, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Owens, Jesse B.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-09-17
Volume
53
Issue
22
ISSN
0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417183639
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01 EB031124)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM160155)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
IntAct, gene therapy, DNA-binding domain mutations, genome editing, human cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review